Roulette More silliness from RouletteGhost & company

Ok and what 's related to one of my post? I don't get it.

 

Hmmm actually 18 is still a sucker play. The best part is that you try to give a lesson to the baccarat guy while you play as dumb as he does.

The only clever bets that you did. I should advise you also to look for chips under tables, that's not far from your winning goal.

You at least can be sure that it is not by playing 24 or 18 numbers as a retarded. I got a pretty competitive vb way to play that "anyone" could
play, except all people who believe they can read randomness.

 

Lol! Don't you know that progressions are directly linked to the edge. If you play a positive system, then progression aren't useless as them are with a negative edge where you'll simply bet more (= lose more coz the total bet is bigger and the% due will be bigger also).

You should stick to ask what gizmo, the randomness reader, thinks about some dozen systems as a good pilot fish before getting ridiculous yourself.

 

OK, now we are getting somewhere. AP because of VB, all that being a positive advantage game, supported by a progression. Sheep shit. You are not qualified to access reading randomness because you can't do it. You are errant in your ignorance. You are posturing as knowing. You are the fake news. You are a very low information voter. You are probably an offspring snowflake of Snowman. "Don't you know that progressions are directly linked to the edge." Nice going Nate. This guy is a real casino builder. I really hope he deludes many others to his fantasy. We need the lights on at our favorite casinos. Sheep Shit Tracker. Visual Ballistics. That's about as good as using a Crescent Wrench to calculate Celestial Mechanics. Where do these idiots come from? They are always experts on everything they have not mastered. It's like they are the same person. Some how the attitude inside the group think is just another form of elitism. Every stinking one of them is an expert on everything they have not mastered. This sheep quack is no exception. Visual Ballistics... what a joke.

 

Visual balistic is probably the first or second thing you would think about if there was no number on the tape. You would immediately realize that the only way is a bias section/pocket or to guess where it will land. But there s numbers and that's where we lose you and all other morons...

Vb is so simple if you try to think about it. Let's make a simple simulation that my nephew could understand to show you that there s sense.

You are into a spin and to make it simple at this moment 12 seconds left before it hit my area/diamond.
At this right moment it is number 0 under my area.
The rotor speed is 4 second per lap.
What will be the number when the ball will hit in 12 seconds?
Answer: 0 because while the ball travels for 12 seconds, rotor will make exactly 3 laps. And we can note also that if rotor was 3 seconds per lap it would have been exactly same except that it would have made 4 laps instead 3.

Now you know that the heart of the mechanic is working and that everything is linked you can start to think about a coherent way to play easier and enough long&accurate.
You could even play 18 numbers!

But please, stop with this shit of reading randomness... you can only convince newbies, morons and Nathan. The fact that you see x pattern won't tell you what to do.

 

Nice fake reality bozo. The first & last thing I always think about is "is it random." Is an RNG real and fair?" I don't think, how do I fabricate a discussion with a straw man argument.

Sorry to tell you but your nephew is smarter than you by at least a whole numbered factor.

more fake world, fake life... idiot, your shit doesn't even bounce good.

You could. You can also go jump in a lake.

Tell it to Ken, Gr8player, Ed, Spike, Glen, JP, possibly Nate, etc... who are now using past randomness characteristics to exploit possible opportunities. You can't win if you don't take that first chance. We have all found ways to find those best first chances for ourselves. We have also found out that there might be one or two people in this world that have mastered VB. But with the new wheels the result of the bounce is clearly unpredictable. You are not an expert. You are just a clown with wishful thinking. You try to take persona of the past advocates of this method. Problem is that new wheels have made your quest useless.

 

Yes, that the typical morons and lazy people 's answer.

You know, i believe for example that it is much harder to balance perfectly a wheel than make it unbalanced... of course you'll think the opposite.

And a moron like you won't realize that there s obvisouly a problem to quote so much people that are beating roulette. In this bunch of people those who'll resist (not win but resist) are those who play less numbers... (if we don't ask ourself what's the aim to resist....)

Most of the time it will depend on the conditions around you. My condition are not same as yours.
And i guess that it is just a speculation, yo uhaven't been to the casino and try to see that yourself... you just repeat what you heard because you're too busy to do weird marabout stuffs.

 

Sheep tracker, you aren't making sense. I started out with less numbers, 1 to 3, and paved all the ground of knowing what works and what doesn't. Nobody was talking about randomness before I did. How do I know this? I was alone in all the arguments. I stood alone for what I had discovered and perfected on my own. I had left all the mechanical system stuff behind and moved on to a more scientific understanding of what trends really are. There was JP but he never really explained the characteristics well. He explained weakness and advantages in MM very well.

So I'm no longer going to give you a platform to argue VB advantage play gobbledygook. Let's end on your mother aborted the wrong twin.

 

You must be born before your grandpa right? and see/did everything...

I haven't created a platform to talk Vb, it's just because you asked for...idiot, scroll up to check. I also like some gamble theory just because i cannot make absolutism about it, but of course for me you play one of worst game i've seen on forums. I suggest you to make a progression on the 38 numbers.

 

The best system is the troika session system .


ND

 

Never heard, why it should be better than another system?

 

I have severed all my ties to that RF.cc and have no regrets having done so .

I like to read about top quality B& M casinos .

I don` t give a rats tail to hear how few or how many numbers one plays .

ND

 

Cashmere Sweater, you posted supposed roulette game results where in a short amount of time, your betting action and P&L ranged from 4 figures to 7. ok bro! This is why it is poison to look on-line about discussion about games... Experienced players get all riled up with troll posting. Waste of time and energy.

 

If you'd have said it in russian, it would have been the same. I don't understand anything about what you're trying to say, want to proove.
First post was to show a -2.7 player that can take 58K
Second post is to show that a -2.7 player don't especially need to bet a lot of number to take some hits, because of course less you play number more you can last.

Yes no doubt that players love to put the cart before the horses, but whatever, you can bet the 37/38 numbers if you want...

 

In post #767 you had quite the ramp up... on paper. Many can write up results and models.

 

Ok i finally get what you mean but look what i've said a bit later...

See it's not me who played this... i didn't post it to parade or to sell something... but this game have really been play...

You got 3 type of play. Those who flat bet and wait house edge kill them step by step, those who making negative progression and risk a lot to win a few and there those who make a positive progression risk "a few" and bet wild with benefices... You got to disconect of the value of the money to make those kind of results.

 

There are l lies, there are damn lies and there are statistics but those are the worst kind of all of them .


Quote by British PM B . Disraeli

 

The goofs at RF talking about MPR >> "I know Steve, so why some members going on, the democratic vote was for 30 sec's, Oh you're going to do a Brexit, Ignore the majority for the few."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The real question I want to know, what are the differences between that shit and an ACTUAL B&M casino? How realistic is MPR?
Does anyone know the link for their rules?

Ken

 

The goofs over at RF.cc might welcome Sharp Tracker There he could present his HG chasing losses with the martingale .


Nothing personal , just a suggestion Therefore take this advice on your own risk


ND

 

Quote me where i have said that i had a HG and using martingale, or just shut up.

I have said that there is no HG, there are just way to resist before you have to pay the due... less number you play more you can hope to resist, and a progression will make you resist also longer or precipate you quicker to pay the due.

Most players like you just run behind all systems they can and ignore everything about variance and its effect, they even don't know where they put their feet when they come to roulette and i just learn today that they even don't know take time to read correctly.