Roulette More silliness from RouletteGhost & company

I guess if I was pathetic

I don’t have time for that shit

 

The two biggest things going on at R30 right now?

A new roulette app and.....Are we living in a simulation? (lol)

A couple posts regarding betting on columns with a 628 step progression with triggers of course. The usual shit.

Ken

 

living in a simulation? sparked my interest

once you read about string theory things get very interesting

it is a debate in the scientific community

step away from the forums and read a little

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-we-living-in-a-computer-simulation/

 

String theory is such a cool read

Steven hawking was into things like this as well

Excel your infant brain a little bit

 

Been there, done that, read that and more.

The universe is a simulation actually makes a great deal of sense. Some great minds believe in it, some don't.

 

See the Game Of Life of John Horton Conway.

 

I admit, yes I think stuff like that is interesting. I do more reading on various "off" subjects than you might know (not flat earth shit).

Will any of this ever be implemented into my daily life? No.

Ken

 

Plan your play and then play your plan . Be consequential .



ND

 

Elvis wrote:" No Steve, Sorry i didn't Make millions yet otherwise i wasn't replying to you.
But even i, Who doesn't know how to profit from turbo's method, understand the basic logic of his method. I Just can't figure out why you don't.
Turbo never said he is betting on Hot numbers as they become Hot!!
How can he? He can't.
Let me try to explain, so Turbo does 't Have to, again....
You bet only on numbers Who have the potential to become Hot!
So, do we bet on numbers that haven't shown? No, we don't.
Do we bet on numbers that Have shown at least once?
Yes! Why? BecUse these numbers Have the potential to become Hot.
When a number is hot when you start to bet on it, it can already be cold again, simple logic Steve.
What are the numbers that bring us profit?
Numbers that opperate above expected!
Do we use past spins? No we don't.
Why? Because we only play present and gambling on future spins.
What are they?
They are numbers that fall from the moment we sit on the Table.
We don't care what numbers Lisa got An hour ago... These are past spins and Have nothing to do with our session, present spins.
See Steve, it ain't that hard."

The problem with this bullshit story Elvis, is that different people having the so called HolyGrail on hot numbers won't play the same numbers depending on when they sat at the table, but for you, it does not matter, whatever numbers, even all different for Jack who began to play 30 minutes ago and Rocco who began to play 5 minutes ago and Jenna who came 69 minutes later, they begin to bet and they will all profit each time!, you are as ill as Turbo.

 

Funny. This entire hot number thread should have taken place 12 years ago at Gambler's Glen.

This is what happens for a cycle of spins. First, you must have the knowledge of what "balance" is about. That is the point in hundreds of cycles where a common average displays a more specific number value (result) what that average condition can be considered normalized. I'm talking about a commonness of the changes from hot to cold numbers and cold to hot numbers. Because these things are in a constant state of change an aware person can start one hour after another person, have a different set of hot and cold numbers and still win. If both persons have a knowledgeable sense of balance that is. All this could be demonstrated by having experts use 18 numbers to run trials from. I know 3 to 5 numbers is safer, or for that matter slower, less volatile. I also know that 24 numbers is too volatile. But 18 numbers is easy to balance. You just need more wins than losses to come out ahead. You can break up 18 numbers into their changing groupings in values of six each. You should have six new numbers that will cool off and not hit in the next 36 spins. You should have 6 warm numbers that will once again hit only once in the 36 spin cycle. And you will get 6 new hot numbers that will come from the cold side and will hit at least twice. These new numbers are the Ken identified numbers. They also come from the warm numbers too. This is the crux of it all. The newest 6 hottest numbers are going to come from the coldest set of 12, the warm set of 12, and the already hottest set of 12. Your only choice is to guess. That is where both Ken and Turbo have worked on selection. I'm suggesting a third way, based on a natural balance point of 18 numbers. If you can isolate only just 6 of the coldest numbers you will have more advantage than Gonzalo Garcia-Pelayo and his family that only needed a 6 extra wins in 100 spin advantage to make millions.



Can you find the six coldest and the six warm numbers in any cycle? It won't be easy.

 

There s a big difference with Gonzalo. When he s sitting at the table and start to play, he allready has an edge even if he s losing money, it's just a time question... at the end he'll win whatever the swings, the casino has not the edge against him.

But systems players determine they must have an edge only by the result or the money they made, it is also just a time question and when you're going to drop chips to play on the table you don't have the edge.
To see how "weird" it is, try to explain to a poker player that you're playing a strategy on hot cards and that you can easily overcome the rake whatever the math are. At roulette it doesn't look weird at first sight, it's more mysterious.

 

Sheeptracker, that does not address the Turbo Theorem of inevitability or Ken's immediate super hot numbers from a local effect. You are trying to make an argument that belittles guessing without accepting any possibility that a person can have an educated guess. So be it. Nothing new about that. But I wanted to point out that it only takes an extra 2 wins per cycle to make millions. I gave you proof of that argument. I don't care if Martians carved prophecies in 4,000 year old tablets that gives you those two extra wins. It's not the how that matters. It's the can you or anyone do it without a physical or mathematical edge?

 

You know the big threads back at GG, what they were? Chasing cold numbers, not hot. Yes, I was part of that revolution. (lol)

Ken

 

I understood yes but those extra wins won't be a guarantee, they come from an observation of a positive swing.

 

Ken, OMG, I forgot that. You must know that I had to think that was a crash test dummy kind of activity.

 

You are correct. There is no guarantee. Does there have to be a guarantee to do it consistently?

 

Over the years, I guess its all about learning. As I say, trial & error is the ONLY way!!

Ken

 

Ken, you should know that I'm impressed with your discovery. It does not matter what you went through to get to it. What's good to see is that there are several of us trying to crack this game. We all went through the phases of learning. We all got stuck on things that did or did not pan out. Remember the Matrix? That guy was fun to ridicule, just to push his buttons. It's all here on the internet.