Roulette Mathematical Averages

I suspect that you and me may be singing from the same hymn sheet

 

Sorry about the last post my internet is being odd and I am new here. I view roulette much the same as I do my hi/lo dice. I like to use infinite money theory. In infinite money theory, you never lose. In fact, the more you lose the larger you win for the risk of taking it so far, but you are staked to infinity so the bust never comes. Say something pays 1:2 I would bet say $5, then $20, then $80, then $320, then $1280 and it hits I spent $425 reaching that point and get a profit on the bet of $640 leaving me with $215 in profit counting the recouped losses to that point. It gets high rather fast but if you always remember where you left off and come back at it the same way you will never lose. You just can't run out of money. LOL. There is that trick. If you get there why bet?

 

El Sr. Juneau dice verdades como los puños, pero aquí hay muchos que creen en las matemáticas y parece que solo ven sus matemáticas, pero las matemáticas existen muchas formas de ejecutarlas.
Juneau se basa en lo mismo que dyksexlic pero se aplica de una manera más básica.
Sería bueno si pudiéramos hablar un rato por Skype.
Saludos

 

have not tried yet .

 

I agree. Playing 9 numbers at straight bet will give you almost 25% but I’ve played the same 9 numbers for 20 - 25 spins and not one hit. If your playing progressive bets then the bank roll takes an almighty hit. Thinking that one of your numbers MUST hit soon is bad strategy.

 

@ Harlequin,


Those 9 numbers were they contiguous numbers of a section on the wheel ?


ND

 

No. Just randomly chosen numbers.

 

He has not understood anything of what Juneau said ...
xxx0 xxx0 xxx0 xxx00 .. where you see here 20 balls without success? If he does not indicate that, he indicates that they will succeed but that the maximum distance between success and success is 4, although it is not quite correct, it would be 5 if you count 0 as another sector or 4 with zero in a sector of 10.
For what Juneau says as Turbo or vaddis and dyksexlic, you have to know all the basics from memory and be much more experienced in many things to see them easily.
regards

 

Why? Is that a rule of randomness? because there is no rule actually. It is not because i play 18 numbers that the maximum window between hits will be 2...

 

Mr. Juneau, my most sincere thanks for your kindness to share this information, at first I do not understand, a few days ago I went back to his explanations and the truth I got to understand what he proposed.
I am very grateful and I have to congratulate you! Bravo!!! I hope he is very good

 

But it looks like on 16 december you allready understood that!

 

I have put it on the 16th? That is not true.
I put that to understand things had to have a minimum of knowledge, but a week ago I discovered it and took all the week doing many tests with my group and it really works, flat game and has between 20-30% advantage.

 

Blimey mate you must be well on your way to a million! You have.. I’ve lost count ... how many HG’s? Quite astounding!

 

WTF?
113 where you win, break even, and win - COOL
122 you win, win and lose one unit -???

-1 vs win +1[all reinvested]
0 or break even vs win +2[2banked,2reinvested]; ND calls the latter[], 'strenghtening the BR'
if not a win +2[2banked] vs win +2[2banked = 4banked in total];

 

extrapolating this aggressively ↑

122
244
[366]
488
[51010]
[61212]
[71414]
81616

12224448etc

i.e. on taking the chance on continuous EC repeats
has obvious advantages over risk of continual parlaying [banking on each 2nd&3rd step]
&or
regression [as pointed above by @Sputnik - intermittent regression to base bets at your command, & optional redefining the base bet]

 

Re-present your jounery in

in detail, with examples in clarity.

Perhaps a pdf report . .
with emphasis on essential mechanic, stripped off of everything unnecessary so that it can be applied to any betting style.