Roulette FIVE one system to rule them all...

Morning Mansi I didnt see this post yesterday. Yes restraint and prime judgenent will save you alot of backward steps.Remember the objective is 5 wins in the first 10 games. If the following kind of result happens. Then you do NOT bet on the remaining games. You just record them. Your next job is to get that 10TH winner.

05●

10●

15●

20●

25○

30●--STOP BETTING HERE.

35○

40○

45●

50●

This saves you relinguishing profits. And going backwards. Its this tight selective betting that is the key to steady forward progress.

Then in the second 50 games. Your biggest concern is nailing the 10th winner. Lets say it pans out like this

55●

60○

65○

70●

75●---BEGIN BETTIN HERE FOR THE 10TH WIN. If you get it. FIVE is over in this set.

80●

85●

90○

95○

00●

And you stop betting and only record the remainder of the set for your records.

Thats why we also have the side bets Mansi. To give you greater profit making opportunities awell as FIVE. So you maximize you time spent in relation to profits made.

 

Interesting, so in other words once you achieve your first 5 wins of 10 games in the first set, you stop betting and then bet again after the 9th win for the 10th win?

I thought that we'll have to continuously keep betting till we achieve the 10 wins in total.

 

No because we are betting against the lowest number we expect to attain. And that is 5. Its hard for me to define this. Because I respond to what unfolds. I will give you a few examples.

05●

10●

15●

20●

25●---Absolutely STOP HERE for the first half

30○

35○

40●

45○

50●--(SPLIT 7/3)

Now you see we already have 7 of our required minumum 10 wins. BUT why would I sit out wins 8 and 9? Because often after a first half of 7 or more wins. The second half starts with a few losses. THEN a cluster of wins. And because the sweet spot for the 10th winner is the 13th to 15th games. I know im not likely to have to be more than 4 times to nail it. The 10th win is our banker bet in the second half.

55○

60○

65●---8th win

70●---9th win

75●----10TH WIN ACHIEVED STOP HERE.

80●

85○

90○

95●

00○

Now is there an exception to this? YES. If the first half was poor with 5 or LESS wins. You better believe im gonna hit the second half HARD.

Its PAYDAY. If you ever see something like this

05○

10○

15●

20○

25●

30●

35○

40○

45●

50○

Its time to RAISE STAKES 3 OR 4 LEVELS in the second half. You are extremely likely to have 7 to 9 winners. You see you must respond to what unfolds before you. Not bet like a zombie a robot. You are virtually gauranteed at least 10 wins out of 20. But they can come in many ways.

 

This is my worst ever set since I have played FIVE. 11 wins out of 20. Only 4 wins in the first half. And the 10th win came by game 19. But look it had company. Understand?

 

And at the other end of the spectrum. This is as good as it ever gets.

 

i have done exactly like this, but have found more success without 5 win, but all the way up to 10, but now im more nutcracking thinking about that 10, what if i have got many in a row like 7-9 wins, is it better to wait to virtual loss, or just keep going, what is your insight about it after 8 years of experience
sometimes i have found it saves me. but another time again it left me wonder,im just skipping all the wins away. I feel perhaps in long term it should not make any difference, but i really dont know either.

 

Its a decison only you can make.

My goal is to come out of as many sets as possible with a profit. If ive made 2 or 3 units from the first 10 games. The 10th win is simply a bonus. Through experience. I know the sweet spot for that 10th win is the 13th--15th games. They capture over 75% of them. So if I arrive at the 11th game with 8 or 9 wins. I know im likely to run into a loss or 2 before that 10th win. So why give back profit. And have to raise unnecessarily?

Yes ive missed quite a few 10th winners on games 11 and 12 through the years. But my logic is if ive akready got say 3 units profit. Am I prepared to give it back for 1 extra unit profit. And my anwser is no.I would rather wait for the 13th game.

So this is an aspect of the strategy that is a personal decision. I like forward movement alot more than recovery bets.

 

it's a great shame that this thread with its' bogus phony claim of a winning system based on patterns has gone largely unchallenged

what it is is clickbait for compulsive gamblers willing to believe that the unbelievable will somehow bail them out of their misery

the Administrators of this forum have failed to act, to at least shoot down its' ridiculous claims, much to their discredit




shame.................shame....................shame

 

Exactly what they are trying to... but in the end the problem become even bigger

 

@Half Smoke

Well at the same time it's endless... normally people should come to forum to know about what probabilities involve but the need of recognition is strong also... and actually on the other side, people love to hear what they want to hear...

 

Sharp ,



Time will tell. The final judge will be the wallet .



ND

 

no, it won't

the ultimate judge is this fact:

his system calls for him to sometimes bet black
why? because he believes it is now advantageous to do so
why is it now advantageous to do so?
per his system: because of what has happened in the past


except the wheel doesn't know what has happened in the past






he has already made a great many statements that are untrue
anything he posts about the fattening of his wallet cannot be believed

 

You COMPLETELY miss the point. But as ND said the the money will do the talking.

You hang too much on probability like it decides everything in a game of chance. NO there are things that no math can explain nor overide.

And a CONSTANT two of which I have found in my lifetime are such things. As I said already. Time will change minds. Success will speak louder than any words. You all come on forums and do nothing but talk. Debate and look down on any who challenge the game.

By xmas this will be the most popular talked about roulette forum since the internet started. Because for the first time ever. Someone is going to prove. This game is totally beatable by a simple mechanical system. When a constant has been identified.

No the wheel has no memory. But variance has a way of being controlled enough to improve the accuracy of prediction. And that is what will be proven here. The time for talking is long over. By xmas alot more people will come to realize the seemingly unbeatable. Can indeed be beaten. And I can do it over and over.

 

your posts are either blatant lies or pathetic foolishness

it's not worth the time and trouble to figure out which

 

yes, there are things that cannot be explained by math or science

but the game of roulette is not one of those things

it is a simple game

any mathematician worth his salt can tell you everything worth knowing about the game

no mathematician would entertain any of your ridiculousness for even one millisecond

 

Exactly why the people of the math are going to be humbled this year. There is one law that rules all. Its called the law of reality. You will say that the wheel the ball has no memory. But you will never see 50 reds or 50 blacks in a row on a live wheel. You will never see the same number hit 10 times in a row. This is the law of REALITY. Random and variance have limits. Points they are not capable of passing. The job of the smart player is to identify one of these. That can be fashioned into a playable profittable strategy. Thats all. And FIVE does that better than anything ive ever seen. Ive been around this game a long time. But you will learn. As will all the doubters.

 

No roulette is not a simple game it can be be very complex. I use sets, which btw is using
mathematics. Some sets can take the lead for hundreds of spins and that's a proven fact.

I don't know if the Fivealive system works or not, but he appears to have provided a lot
of detail so it's down to you and other negative commentators to prove it doesn't work
and not by flippant comments about mathematicians, as they don't have all the answers
and often argue among themselves.

 

Correct

Its natural for people to doubt. Afterall more than 250 years has passed. And nobody has ever proven theyve become rich from a systematic paper system. Youve heard of successful sports bettors. Black jack players (card counting). Poker players (king of the bluff). And on occasion casinos have been taken in roulette. By teams who have discovered a biased wheel. Or an extreme martingale that worked over a limited period. 13 against the bank. The Norman Leigh hit on Monte Carlo 1966. Being the most notorious.

But the game being beaten systematically. Over a long period of time. No. And thats where I come in. FIVE will be an historical reference point in years to come. When anyone asks can the game be beaten longterm by a paper system. They will point overhere. And remember the year 2019.

When it finally became reality. My only concern is how far they will let me go. Because be sure of this casinos know when someone has them beat far sooner than any stubborn people of the math.

 

You're talking about things where probabilities can be modified or a martingale that can last for a certain period that wouldn't work same way on all patterns. But Five doesn't change anything about probabilities, you&delectus can also only work on a certain period without know what will happen...

By the way, before you started, you never mentioned that you would offer them a bit more than 200£ to make them believe you were a gambler and i don't see any explanation about that ammount of 200, why not 50 why not 500 why not 1000? That could be an ammount that you lost and that you made up in a story telling.

 

I will upload a screen shot of me going absolute zero on the first 290 quid deposit later. My friend has dealt with these people before. If the money only goes in one direction. They would stop me before 5 grand and I wouldnt make my 25 week target. From here there will only be one direction the money moves in. Whether its a 3% increase or 30% increase in a week. One direction. You shall see. Weekly updates every Sunday.