Roulette Turbo Was Right!!

#notenoughballstoplayforreal

GRIN sociopath creating fake friends because all the old experienced known members from GG are rejecting you.

 

To Quos,

No clues, just an elegant math solution.

[youtube]

Applied to the game of roulette(finite set of 37 numbers):
Generating a random stream of numbers K you will get 66% "guesses" right. To further increase your accuracy, choose K=18 (median value of [0,37] ) ;you will be "guessing" right 75%.
Fun part just begins,
Choose K=0 for a roulette game of 2,000,000,001
20,000,000,001 and 200,000,000,001 pockets

[-1,000,000,000,+1,000,000,000]
[-10,000,000,000,+10,000,000,000]/
[-100,000,000,000,+100,000,000,000]
Guess how many times you will be right?

#notenoughspins, #1in37,#showmeyourproof, #spandexboys #nowaynohownomore

 

Thanks CDN!

Then if k=18, and we generate with RNG number A, so to guess the value of B we have the following:

If A>k then A>B, then we bet numbers between 0 and A.
If A<k then A<B, then we bet numbers between A and 36.

Although we will hit 75% of the time, on many occasions we would have to bet up to 36 numbers. Let's imagine that A=36 (for k=18) then we would bet all numbers between 0 and 35, that is, 36 numbers.

This means that we cannot bet on any value of A because we would not generate profits in the medium-long term.

The question is ...... for any value of A (I mean suppose we only bet on a fixed value of A), will we still guess 75% of the time?

I'm trying to see how to take real advantage to make profit.

Thanks in advance CDN !!
Best regards!

 

Inside this circus of a thread with kindergarden dialogues, there shines a voice of reason.
Thank you for your persistence.

 

too much foolishness and it gets noone anywhere

just forum BS....noone TRULY cares

#notenoughspins

i thank turbo for what hes done...whats wrong with betting a few numbers that hit above expectation? we know it occurs most 37 spins sets, so who cares if thats how he plays...some of you need to go for a walk

 

Sorry, but there's just one or two too many pockets on the wheel for the law of the third or pigeon nonsense to work. In other words, the house payoff is short of what the probability of winning says is fair.

 

Hi, CDN.
Also very interested in this topic. I don 't know English well, and I don 't quite know what he 's talking about in video. I 've been trying to figure out what it 's about for hours, and how do I apply it to roulette?
In a previous post, you wrote that you can use this to calculate what number can be - more than or less than the current number. As I understand it, using what 's in the video. But how do you even apply that to roulette? What is "K" in this case? I realized something that I had somehow to pick half of the two third for that chances. But tell me, how at least do you relate all this to roulette? Or is it very difficult? Thanks.

 

The problem with what's in the video as it pertains to roulette is that all three factors are already known. A, B, & K are already decided before the wager is made. In roulette only the 1st number is known, then the bettor must manufacture the 2nd number. The 3rd number, the one you're hinging your bet on, has not yet been decided. Simply put, it could go either way, minus the house edge.

 

To Platton

A is the last spun number - gerenerated by your roulette wheel /RNG
You have to input K yourself- either using a RNG generator or choosing a constant number K. For convenience, since you are already at the roulette table, you can choose K= the second last number (or x last number), it doesn't matter. By doing that your probability of being right will be around 66%
To increase your guess accuracy to 75% choose K=18.
Depending on the A(last spun number) and your number K , your guess will be 75% accurate on B (future Roulette spin): B will be higher or lower than A. Now before rushing in and creating a negative progression system on (1-36) numbers, STOP. It does not work like that. Think of it like a line of code in your betting program, a part of your final bet that you are sure of 3/4 times.
Not all math paradoxes can be exploited ( Parrondo is one example that cannot be used in roulette) but do open your mind and study number cycles, combinatorics and graph theory. Then translate what you have learned to this game.

 

CDN,

The house payout is still going to come up short of the probability of winning. To better grasp the math a great place for you to learn is to visit the wizardofodds.com

 

Don't be a mathZombie. Get this mathNazi out of your head. All he has is his tired platitudes.

 

The payout might be short but thanks to random the game always gives the player good math to rely on which negates the house edge and into the players favor, remember when Turbo said 38 people choose their own individual number to play for 1000 spins and a third of them will win? Just think how you could be one of those 12-13 people....

 

I know one thing, all those winning players were on hot numbers and won because of numbers repeating.

Actually, almost all of them can walk out winners if they play it right.

 

Show us the facts that back up this worthless garbage! Otherwise, you're just another in the long line of typical ploppy losers!

 

There is a clear benefit to betting on numbers that hit above expectation. It happens during every set

those that bash, demean, and slander, are only protecting their own agendas and/or advantage play being the only way.

 

Strange though isn't it - even with all those pockets almost the exact same thing happens every time you run off a session of spins.

let me see if it still works or maybe you're right ! Let's see.



Nope, nothing in the universe has changed.
The math still makes it incredibly easy for anyone to win.

#PocketsDontMatter

 

Remember that crazy video from the 60's where the 1/2 life is measured.
See anything strange in the above where the "^" denotes the average ?
2/3 of 37 is 24.6666667 Hmm
Keep going, it all matches. Hmmm.

So instead of a 1/2 life - in random (roulette specifically) we have a 2/3 life every cycle of 37 spins.
After 37 spins, 2/3 have appeared
After another 37 spins, 2/3 of what's left has appeared.
After another 37 spins, 2/3 of what's left has appeared.
After another 37 spins, 2/3 of what's left has appeared.

Not predictable at all right ?
And that's more than enough info I think.

 

I know Sir No One, you're going to say it's useless and you're friends "invented" it all as a cover story
for winning at bias wheel play (lol - as if it's not just simple math that has always existed this way)
And you'll say I can't tell what numbers will appear even though I know what numbers have already
appeared and which ones haven't.... I guess...... random pretty much hands it to you on a platter doesn't it ?

 

Wow I actually learned something even new TG, i'll have to look at this

 

Who and what is sucking?