Roulette Reading Randomness

It's a tempest in a teapot. Don't worry. He set that section up so that he could delete posts. If you can do that then why not do it?

 

Another Alrelax has gotten power ? Disgusting.

 

Does this cat pay a fee to GamblingForums.com ?

 

Taking a crap on my thread now, are we?

 

Nuff said.

 

I just reached the top 20.

 

Wow so yer sayin that a streak of 7 reds as likely to pop as a streak of 2 red, hey hey?

 

1.) Nothing is likely to happen. It never will be. It will just surface in front of you.

2. I'm saying that swarms of 2's will happen. They will never be likely to happen either. I've clearly demonstrated swarms of similar characteristics in my examples here.

When I get questions like that I think two things. One, the person never studied my work here. Two, I did a piss poor job of communicating. I can't make people learn. When I get questions about what a sample of a situation might mean then I can deal with it. But when I get questions that are far from reality and look more like troll craft then I think so what. I don't want to teach this person. So just for the sake of argument, how could 7 in a row ever equate to 2 in a row? I would think that this person is an inexperienced gambler. But's what's worse is that this question is like implying that I'm claiming something stupid in order to get me into an idiot's trap. That's when the upbringing and breeding of that person starts to interest me from a regards to inbred genetic deformation.

 

Been having a blast self destructing on R-sim. Have had huge wins streaks only to hit the self destruct flat betting on long shots.

Might try flat betting only, combined with a minimum bet. In other words no double down on attacks. Let's see if I can win every time with that method.

 

Yup yer a nutjob with a capital F. Your nutjobbery us up there with the garnabby jones and that asymbac character, hey hey.

 

Here this applies to you too.

 

Not to interfere here but I liked your p posts at a certain forum bout Sleepy Joe and Mr T..

 

Hey, hey. Garnabby still spooks 'em.

 

Excellent post of yours at another forum communicating with St.

 

The garnabby scares me, and even worse the cat lives just down the road a piece from me, hey hey.

 

Thanks. He's difficult to communicate with regarding randomness.

 

I have noticed his difficulty understanding the concept of randomness .


He is not the only one but he will eventually get it .


Tell him what it is NOT as you had explained in one of your posts .

 

Let's just see if he gets back to me. I was a little sarcastic and smarmy when he broke it down for me to define singles and the weak side. I said that the casino will give you chips that can be exchanged for money if your bet hits from the set you were betting on. Is it really that difficult? Do people have no idea what singles are? Do people have difficulty relating to the weak side?

 

I did see that post by him about singles swell as your reply .


Get back to the Randomness explanation and that might dawn on him what singles are in comparison to a swarm .

 

He is the one descending into finite definitions. He can't understand me yet. It's my fault and he controls the conversation in that he must come back to it. I can't go forward until he knows what singles on the weak side means. This all started in trying to give him a single idea to program as a sim. I'm programming him because it's easier to program people than it is to program a computer.