Roulette 1 Unit Each Visit

Turbo made a method based upon a single number to achieve +1 unit each visit.
Is an old method and pretty sure Turbo has moved on to better options and improve his skills?

Now, this topic requires some homework and dedication to fully understand the concept.
Is not another hint topic because you can use google and find appropriate information from other gambling boards.

My solution to win at least +1 unit each visit will be the Parachute methodology where you use each and every selection with a full cycle. Skip all other solution including the binomial probability solution.

The problem with the Parachute method is the selection process.
Turbo made a solution where you follow the hot section others has used follow the last or a static number.

I have been testing Hot & Cold number selection based upon randomized selection process.
This means that the final target number has never been the same for each and every session.
The main reason to avoid a static and mechanical target number has been the failure of such a method is bound to happen sooner or later.
It will also reach failure using a randomized target number, but then you relay on some likelihood and luck that can last much longer than a 100% static and mechanical selection process.

Here comes the core behind the randomized parameters.
Even if a final target number fail to show and you follow that location on the table using a Parachute method, the Parachute method might still win.
This means that the failure of the final target number has to match and correlate in times, date and exact moment at the table where both the Parachute method itself and the final target number has to fail.
Both at the same time when using randomized target number.

There are 365 days during one whole year and I won two straight years in a row using this randomized selection process.
That is RNG testing with Roulette Extreme.
This means that if I would have regressed after winning half I would have been operating with casino money twice without losing.

Now some might not be satisfied to win +1 unit for each visit, so I come up with a randomized selection process that allows you to win around 5 to 30 units each visit based upon the same principals.
During testing, the final target number fail to show three to six times during one hundred sessions and the parachute method have won during all does situations.
That means that you had three to six potential situation when the parachute could fail completely.
If that final target number and parachute method would have a match and correlate in time, date and situation with the randomized selection process.

This is a solid and awesome method to win playing roulette.

Cheers

 

Hi Sputnik, no it is not a good strategy in the long run because of the odds and payout, we won't repeat again.

I suggest this method that brings an edge but you will need a lot of patience:. You use this fake modified ball:



So basically, you sit at the table using the minimal value chip and play one chip randomly on red/black. You wait until the dealer throws the original ball outside the wheel which DOES HAPPEN eventually, thanks to the light balls used nowadays (that make life of VB/computer players much harder, not to say obsolete); you just have to be there. Now when it does, you literally RUN to reach the ball and SWAP it with the original ball, the dealer should thank you for it. After about half an hour (not immediately after the ball change to not arise pitboss suspicion), you ask the dealer for the maximal chip unit and you are ready for the winning streak with your hand below the table pushing the magic button.

I know you will tell me it is cheating, yes but if your goal is to win then you have to use it, didn't Einstein say you have to steal the dealer's chips if you want to win?. There is no maths/statistical formula, Richard Marcus for example understood it and won millions, there are no maths system that achieved this or maybe a Qatari who visited Las Vegas for one night due to luck only.

Best Regards.

 

Bago, what a load of fucking bullshit. Get a life will ya.

 

Einstein haha good 1. Prolly couldn't play his way out of a wet paper bag.

 

According to Bago`s post always carry heavier balls on you when at a roulette table game . What else is new ? Then only drink Highballs .

 

I just want to illustrate that even a mechanical selection become random and works as a selection.
For example assume you pick your lucky number, can be any, but with this test nr 32.

Then this number will fail to show during 100 trails and be sleeping.
But is up to the wheel to randomly pick wish of the two to three numbers that will fall into sleep.

When you pick a static number you get around four to six sleeping situation every hundred sessions.
This means that you have four to six chances to lose the whole parachute.

But if the parachute wins, then it does not matter if the target number fail to show.
And after risking half the sessions of the whole amount you operate with casino money.

Here is 300 session won and where you can see the final target number fail, but the parachute win.

1. W
2. W
3. W
4. W
5. W
6. W
7. W
8. W
9. W
10. W
11. W
12. W
13. W
14. W
15. W
16. W
17. W
18. W
19. W
20. W
21. W
22. W
23. W
24. W
25. W
26. W
27. W
28. W
29. W
30. W
31. W
32. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
33. W
34. W
35. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
36. W
37. W
38. W
39. W
40. W
41. W
42. W
43. W
44. W
45. W
46. W
47. W
48. W
49. W
50. W
51. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
52. W
53. W
54. W
55. W
56. W
57. W
58. W
59. W
60. W
61. W
62. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
63. W
64. W
65. W
66. W
67. W
68. W
69. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
70. W
71. W
72. W
73. W
74. W
75. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
76. W
77. W
78. W
79. W
80. W
81. W
82. W
83. W
84. W
85. W
86. W
87. W
88. W
89. W
90. W
91. W
92. W
93. W
94. W
95. W
96. W
97. W
98. W
99. W
100. W

- - -

1. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
2. W
3. W
4. W
5. W
6. W
7. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
8. W
9. W
10. W
11. W
12. W
13. W
14. W
15. W
16. W
17. W
18. W
19. W
20. W
21. W
22. W
23. W
24. W
25. W
26. W
27. W
28. W
29. W
30. W
31. W
32. W
33. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
34. W
35. W
36. W
37. W
38. W
39. W
40. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
41. W
42. W
43. W
44. W
45. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
46. W
47. W
48. W
49. W
50. W
51. W
52. W
53. W
54. W
55. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
56. W
57. W
58. W
59. W
60. W
61. W
62. W
63. W
64. W
65. W
66. W
67. W
68. W
69. W
70. W
71. W
72. W
73. W
74. W
75. W
76. W
77. W
78. W
79. W
80. W
81. W
82. W
83. W
84. W
85. W
86. W
87. W
88. W
89. W
90. W
91. W
92. W
93. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
94. W
95. W
96. W
97. W
98. W
99. W
100. W

- - -

1. W
2. W
3. W
4. W
5. W
6. W
7. W
8. W
9. W
10. W
11. W
12. W
13. W
14. W
15. W
16. W
17. W
18. W
19. W
20. W
21. W
22. W
23. W
24. W
25. W
26. W
27. W
28. W
29. W
30. W
31. W
32. W
33. W
34. W
35. W
36. W
37. W
38. W
39. W
40. W
41. W
42. W
43. W
44. W
45. W
46. W
47. W
48. W
49. W
50. W
51. W
52. W
53. W
54. W
55. W
56. W
57. W
58. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
59. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
60. W
61. W
62. W
63. W
64. W
65. W
66. W
67. W
68. W
69. W
70. W
71. W
72. W
73. W
74. W
75. W
76. W
77. W
78. W
79. W
80. W
81. W
82. W
83. W
84. W
85. W
86. W
87. W
88. W
89. W
90. W
91. W
92. W
93. W
94. W
95. W
96. W
97. W
98. W
99. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
100. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN

 

Here is another sample with 300 sessions, all won +1 unit.

The selection uses the binomial probability for one single target number where one number hit within 25 attempts has 50% probability.
The trigger waits for one single number to hit twice within 50 trails and then play 50 attempts that number will repeat.
Hot number.
If you lose 50 attempts you play the cold number for the next 50 attempts.
Total 100 trails/attempts.

But there is no difference in picking your favourite number or using hot & cold.
The random parameters in what number will sleep or hit are the same using both methods.

What is fun with this sample of 300 sessions is that the Parachute fail once and the final target number win!

I have been using the Binomial Parachute Method for both samples during testing.
My recommendations would be using cycles for each location.

I mark the situation where the parachute method fail but the target number win with bold letters
​

1. 21
2. 7
3. 34
4. 30
5. 7
6. 26
7. 36
8. 32
9. 18
10. 6
11. 6
12. 34
13. 49
14. 43
15. 13
16. 8
17. 11
18. 42
19. 6
20. 50/8
21. 33
22. 5
23. 34
24. 7
25. 14
26. 4
27. 18
28. 24
29. 37
30. 33
31. 36
32. 50/21
33. 50/18
34. 50/50 target number fail but parachute win
35. 34
36. 50/50 target number fail but parachute win
37. 50/6
38. 3
39. 50/50 target number fail but parachute win
40. 1
41. 9
42. 9
43. 3
44. 35
45. 50/50 target number fail but parachute win
46. 40
47. 50/48
48. 50/15
49. 37
50. 21
51. 50/36
52. 50/50 target number fail but parachute win
53. 50/17
54. 38
55. 48
56. 6
57. 50/36
58. 50/49
59. 7
60. 14
61. 21
62. 50/44
63. 7
64. 19
65. 21
66. 50/50 target number fail but parachute win
67. 34
68. 25
69. 7
70. 9
71. 29
72. 11
73. 26
74. 9
75. 50/45
76. 2
77. 15
78. 14
79. 23
80. 50/7
81. 50
82. 12
83. 42
84. 15
85. 18
86. 27
87. 50/26
88. 6
89. 50/20
90. 13
91. 50/41
92. 50/19
93. 11
94. 6
95. 9
96. 3
97. 2
98. 39
99. 50/32
100. 50/12

-- -

1. 27
2. 8
3. 7
4. 50/17
5. 50/24
6. 18
7. 8
8. 9
9. 29
10. 21
11. 19
12. 3
13. 8
14. 7
15. 47
16. 50/42
17. 40
18. 47
19. 12
20. 50/40
21. 2
22. 50/39
23. 15
24. 35
25. 20
26. 50/32
27. 28
28. 50/7
29. 12
30. 20
31. 20
32. 44
33. 50/32
34. 42
35. 3
36. 50/32
37. 21
38. 44
39. 4
40. 50/22
41. 25
42. 9
43. 7
44. 2
45. 13
46. 29
47. 14
48. 50/5
49. 39
50. 35
51. 20
52. 3
53. 16
54. 7
55. 44
56. 50/46
57. 7
58. 50/50 target number fail, but parachute win
59. 12
60. 50/38
61. 9
62. 11
63. 7
64. 50/14
65. 16
66. 15
67. 42
68. 28
69. 44
70. 50/2
71. 7
72. 50/15
73. 3
74. 44
75. 50/33
76. 50/50 target number fail, but parachute win
77. 50/7
78. 17
79. 8
80. 10
81. 50/50 target number fail, but parachute win
82. 9
83. 6
84. 1
85. 14
86. 50/4
87. 41
88. 11
89. 14
90. 30
91. 21
92. 11
93. 2
94. 20
95. 8
96. 41
97. 21
98. 4
99. 3
100. 4

---

1. 23
2. 36
3. 6
4. 50/50 TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
5. 33
6. 18
7. 26
8. 4
9. 40
10. 8
11. 35
12. 50/32
13. 5
14. 43
15. 50/2
16. 21
17. 1
18. 50/16
19. 14
20. 50/2
21. 50/33
22. 12
23. 50/50 TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
24. 50/3
25. 26
26. 50/12
27. 37
28. 12
29. 2
30. 50/43
31. 16
32. 16
33. 37
34. 32
35. 28
36. 18
37. 50/15
38. 40
39. 32
40. 50/46
41. 17
42. 50
43. 37
44. 50/16
45. 41
46. 50/4
47. 46
48. 50/28
49. 2
50. 44
51. 5
52. 50/50 TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
53. 18
54. 50/12
55. 50/47
56. 50/50 TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
57. 50/9
58. 8
59. 41
60. 47
61. 5
62. 17
63. 17
64. 22
65. 7
66. 1
67. 9
68. 50/50 TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
69. 7
70. 31
71. 50/6
72. 21
73. 30
74. 11
75. 22
76. 32
77. 10
78. 11
79. 50/50 TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
80. 50/50 TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
81. 8
82. 11
83. 50/2
84. 3
85. 44 PARACHUTE FAIL BUT TARGET NUMBER WIN
86. 9
87. 50/37
88. 6
89. 11
90. 50/9
91. 50/50 TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
92. 36
93. 26
94. 26
95. 7
96. 18
97. 50/7
98. 30
99. 6
100. 50/11

 

Trying to win even a fraction of a unit per visit isn't going to work either in the long run. For the same reason that you can't multiply a negative number times a positive number and produce a positive number.

 

I wanted to show everyone that no other selection is better than the options I show.
Did not make another 300 sessions because I could see after 100 sessions that the performance is the same with on single target number.
Test back to back when a number awake after sleeping 100 trails or more and the result is the same as the others.

With my samples, we would be operating with casinos money four times in a row.
That means that we could use Up & Pull with positive progression with more advance staking plan.

Here are the results for back to back after a number awake after 100 trails or more ...

1. W
2. W
3. W
4. W
5. W
6. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
7. W
8. W
9. W
10. W
11. W
12. W
13. W
14. W
15. W
16. W
17. W
18. W
19. W
20. W
21. W
22. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
23. W
24. W
25. W
26. W
27. W
28. W
29. W
30. W
31. W
32. W
33. W
34. W
35. W
36. W
37. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
38. W
39. W
40. W
41. W
42. W
43. W
44. W
45. W
46. W
47. W
48. W
49. W
50. W
51. W
52. W
53. W
54. W
55. W
56. W
57. W
58. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
59. W
60. W
61. W
62. W
63. W
64. W
65. W
66. W
67. W
68. W
69. W
70. W
71. W
72. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
73. W
74. W
75. W
76. W
77. W
78. W
79. W
80. W
81. W
82. W
83. W
84. W
85. W
86. W
87. W
88. W
89. W
90. W
91. W
92. W
93. W
94. W
95. W
96. W TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
97. W
98. W
99. W
100. W

 

I don't know what it is that you're trying to say.

I can't see why the parachute method should be any better than just guessing at random.

 

I think I will use Unibet, have not decided yet.
Will test and see if real results can match the simulations with Roulette Extreme winning two years in a row operating with casino money.

I like the idea to regress and after that stay at the same level or use Up & Pull (positive staking plan)
Why stay at the same level and give it all back to the casino.

I thinking live dealers when I play online.
One time when I play an Auto Wheel with La Partage Rule they stop the video feed and maintain the wheel during ten minutes and then you could connect again.
Don't want that to happen when I use the Parachute Methodology.

Cheers

 

I know the quiet audience and have one more randomized selection.
Turbo says there is no need for triggers and you can play randomly, I agree, but like rules how to achieve a random selection.

Anyone could pick any number at the table but after some decisions, you might get into a bad habit picking same or similar numbers.

Enter a table and wait for the next outcome to show.
Decide if you are going to play the next number on the right side or the left side of that particular hitting number.
Clockwise or Counter Clockwise Direction.

The number that hit has 37 degrees of freedom and are randomly distributed.
You play the number next to it in CW or CCW direction, both situations are random, even if you alternate between directions or only use one direction.

All results are Hit and Run where I start the simulation from scratch and after one complete session erases the distribution for a completely new game.

Again we can see that the average is about six losses for the final target number to fail.

Clarification, for example, if you use the binomial parachute you have six locations where you bet more then one single number.
Each lower location has 50% probability to happen and comes with higher payouts.

Here are the results for the selection:

1. W CW
2. W CCW
3. W CW
4. W CCW
5. W CW
6. W CCW
7. W CW
8. W CCW
9. W CW
10. W CCW
11. W CW
12. W CCW TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
13. W CW
14. W CCW
15. W CW
16. W CCW
17. W CW
18. W CCW
19. W CW
20. W CCW
21. W CW
22. W CCW
23. W CW
24. W CCW
25. W CW
26. W CCW
27. W CW
28. W CCW
29. W CW
30. W CCW
31. W CW
32. W CCW
33. W CW
34. W CCW
35. W CW
36. W CCW
37. W CW
38. W CCW
39. W CW TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
40. W CCW
41. W CW
42. W CCW
43. W CW
44. W CCW
45. W CW
46. W CCW
47. W CW
48. W CCW
49. W CW TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
50. W CCW
51. W CW
52. W CCW
53. W CW
54. W CCW
55. W CW
56. W CCW
57. W CW TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
58. W CCW
59. W CW
60. W CCW
61. W CW TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
62. W CCW
63. W CW
64. W CCW TARGET NUMBER FAIL BUT PARACHUTE WIN
65. W CW
66. W CCW
67. W CW
68. W CCW
69. W CW
70. W CCW
71. W CW
72. W CCW
73. W CW
74. W CCW
75. W CW
76. W CCW
77. W CW
78. W CCW
79. W CW
80. W CCW
81. W CW
82. W CCW
83. W CW
84. W CCW
85. W CW
86. W CCW
87. W CW
88. W CCW
89. W CW
90. W CCW
91. W CW
92. W CCW
93. W CW
94. W CCW
95. W CW
96. W CCW
97. W CW
98. W CCW
99. W CW
100. W CCW

 

Good job and good luck

If it works for you that’s all that matters

I’m interested in the details though

If you won two years in a row doing what you are doing then how much weight does bago and Caleb have when they say it’s not good or can’t work? Not much weight at all we know that. Just wasted cyber space on their parts.

 

I deposit money into Unibet and will start playing today using this method.
Details are all over the internet.

I use the Binomial Parachute with a twist.

Cheers

 

Sputnik ,
Happy Winnings to you !


Nathan Detroit

 

For the weight you can add Einstein, Blaise Pascal and very smart people who are experts in mathematics, statistics. Also all the smart coders who have designed complicated softwares to design automatic systems and artificial intelligence with back testing over millions of spins and so far no solution has been found simply because Roulette is a very simple equation that cannot produce a positive number since the game has 2 factors: odds of winning and payout. Simple as that. Also I understand why you have a dedicated thread RouletteGhost mentionning only silliness comes from your mouth, another example is you seem impressed that someone has been a winner for 2 years whereas it is not the time that matters but the number of played spins and the number of bets on the table. If I go to the Casino every weekend playing 1 spin on red and I am positive after 2 years you will be shocked obviously!. Go back to school and learn basic maths and buy an average brain for Christmas you will please everybody on the forum!.

Best Regards.

 

The logic for the test is missing.

For starters, why must the player only shoot for one unit per day?
What constitutes a visit? 24 hrs?
What magic happens after the player leaves that allows the player to return and win again after having left?
Why can't the player just keep playing without leaving and just pretend that the next spin of the wheel is a new visit?
What about the sessions where the player loses and never even breaks even, does the bankroll balance carry forward?

 

Not the forum for this Sputnik

 

Then it shouldn't be posted on the wizardofvegas forum either, because you also won't like what the actuaries, mathematicians, and gaming experts have to say about it.