Roulette 1 Unit Each Visit

If it works it works that’s what I say about it.

 

Roulette can’t be beaten. It can be enjoyed though

It strikes me that the bagos and calebs still entertain the system forums. Weird.

 

Yes wEiRd!

 

Risk Management

Win target will be half the amount I risk.
Then I will regress and operate with casino money.
Will start with a higher base bet then minimum.

Hit & Run
I have my own conclusions about the subject and will not debate.

Bankroll management

I will not play with scared money and will risk two session banks to succeed.
If the first bank fails I will considering it having the same probability winning the lottery.
At least it feels that way, the odds are less than 1.5% to bust and over 98.5% to succeed.

Daily Routine

I will try to play one session each and every day.
But if there is no time or any other issue I will skip one day but compensate the next day.
Then I will enter two different tables/wheels using Hit & Run to compensate.

Cheers

 

Contradictions and stupidity strikes you and indeed with such character as you are, we could open a circus and you would be a very funny clown. We would make a lot of money contrary to Sputnik hit and run mortal parachute systems

Best Regards.

 

That's right, it cannot be beaten if there's no edge...

Of course it can be enjoyed but imo i don't think that the system of the parachute to win one unit and starting a long long fight is a good way... I think it's better to take advantage of the volatility of the game on your lucky day, you must not care about money to do that! I allready seen crazy winning case!

But everyone is writting his betting sequence and whatever they do, nobody will escape to swings (even if you got an edge). Shorter your betting sequence is, better it is to be on the right side of the curve, taking advantage of volatility of the game.

 

Trying to beat Roulette with statistics/maths is like trying to resolve the 9 dots puzzle without leaving the square, it's IMPOSSIBLE, like it is impossible to not face the Roulette house edge = negative expectancy = YOU LOSE in the Long Run or Short Run if you are unlucky. End of story, so you better find something else if your goal is to make money.

 

What the hell are you? Liberal media? Cutting and splicing phrases to fit your agenda

You can’t beat the math of roulette. It is what it is. But you can play a strategy with a stoploss and reign victorious more often than not if you wish

Why even entertain the forums? You are strikingly like caleb. Hmmmm

 

You are contradicting yourself on purpose to entertain us reassure me?. If not, you need an emergy rendez-vous with a good psychiatrist!.

 

The forums are like a cabaret . QED.



ND

 

Ghost,

Your third sentence contradicts your first sentence.
Question, do people lose because they wish not to win?
Does the math matter only if you wish it to apply?

Logic, it's always in the way!




Ghost,

You are excused.

 

Haven’t seen that one before

You are worse than a parrot.

 

My pet rock has more common sense than you have.

 

Update

I am almost done with the preparations.

Deposit money into Unibet - Check
Write down a chart for tracking during play - Check
Still, adjusting the staking plan for the binomial parachute - working on that

For the quiet audience, I will give some details about how the binomial parachute look like and I will explain how it works.

Each day when I will take a peek into the random bits from the Arabic Wheel at Unibet.
I will wait for the first outcome to show with 37 degrees of freedom.
Then I will pick the first High/Low number next to the outcome in a clockwise direction.
That number is the location on the table layout that I will follow using my binomial parachute method.
Next session next day I will repeat the procedure except that this time I will pick the High/Low number in an anti-clockwise direction.

The random process is to avoid favorizing any numbers or in any way and avoid any mechanical selection process.
I will depend on luck for each session to succeed using several random parameters.

Each location using the binomial parachute has 50% probability to hit no matter what location I use on the table layout.
But I use a randomly picked target number as my final selection if the binomial parachute locations fail.

This is how the list looks like:

0. EC
1. EC

2. Dozen
3. Dozen

4. Line
5. Line
6. Line
7. Line

8. Corner
9. Corner
10. Corner
11. Corner
12. Corner
13. Corner

14. Street
15. Street
16. Street
17. Street
18. Street
19. Street
20. Street
21. Street

22. Split
23. Split
24. Split
25. Split
26. Split
27. Split
28. Split
29. Split
30. Split
31. Split
32. Split
33. Split

34. Single
35. Single
36. Single
37. Single
38. Single
39. Single
40. Single
41. Single
42. Single
43. Single
44. Single
45. Single
46. Single
47. Single
48. Single
49. Single
50. Single
51. Single
52. Single
53. Single
54. Single
55. Single
56. Single
57. Single
58. Single

59. Single
60. Single
61. Single
62. Single
63. Single
64. Single
65. Single
66. Single
67. Single
68. Single
69. Single
70. Single
71. Single
72. Single
73. Single
74. Single
75. Single
76. Single
77. Single
78. Single
79. Single
80. Single
81. Single
82. Single
83. Single

84. Single
85. Single
86. Single
87. Single
88. Single
89. Single
90. Single
91. Single
92. Single
93. Single
94. Single
95. Single
96. Single
97. Single
98. Single
99. Single
100. Single

Cheers

 

Sir anyone,

Unfortunately you aren’t like the Wizard forum posters

Ya see, people know roulette is a negative expectation game

You happen to spend a lot of your time on system forums rehashing the same thing all the time

That makes you a loser. Be like the other wizard guys who claim to play AP

Don’t be worried about everyone else.

You spend your free time bashing system players who literally use the forum for what it’s desiged for

Let them play their systems

I’d really guess you are mental in some capacity and need help

Guys like you and bago aren’t all there. Few fries short of a happy meal

The elevator doesn’t quite make it to the top, does it?

 

That pesky psychological term.....what is it? Oh yea....projecting. That’s what you clown do. Project.

 

Ghost,

Give us some more deep comments.

 

Obviously you don't, since you claim you can bypass the negative expectation thanks to special strategy and smart stop-loss haha. You are worse than a newbie who would come on the forum and claim the Martingale is an unbeatable system.

If you went to school (I have a doubt) you should know that "repeating is teaching" especially when you are in front of a dunce like you who does not seem to ram the information directly, so thanks Caleb for being so patient explaining why you are so wrong, he has much more roulette experience and knowledge than you, therefore learn from him and be respectful, otherwise your dedicated thread will always be at the top of this forum and therefore you will be ignored because your posts clearly demonstrate your silliness.

 

Ok Calebs. Seek help.

 

Y do U guys just fight and argue?????????

U guys are the exact same as being in a Micky D's and observing 4 or 5 little kids yelling and screaming with nonsense until their parents pull them apart.

I was there the other day and the one kid was standing fast as to how the discharge from your nose is actual "special food" for "special people" and if froze would be ice cream, LOL just bout the same as your arguments over gambling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!