Baccarat A Baccarat Challenge!

Ok so I was thinking we I could pony up result of live dealt shoe from the party poker one at a time and cats could call their bets before hands. So all of you guesser, trender, shoe reader, drive road cats can do yer subjective that and this and show us all yer baccarats prowess. Of course the Jae cat's style is pure mechanical so we can easy apply his style to the hundred shoe tests after the facts. So who's in? I'll even take the mohegans sun retard off iggy for this, hey hey!!!!

 

You getting tired of sitting in front of the computer 8 hour a day? Here. Play this shoe Toddler! See if you can get 1.27 units out of it. I got just a few more than that the other day!

pBpBBBpBBpBBBBBBBBpBBpBpBpppppBBpBBpppBBBBpBpppBBBppBBBppBpBBpBpBBBBpBp
WW LL WWWW L WWWW L WW LL W L WWW L WW L W L WW L WWW LL W L WWWW LL WWW L

I don't want you to cheat, Toddler, so I had to erase "the magic." LOL Just an easy trender's shoe!

 

Uh yeah, that's the problem with you chickens shit, scared loser recreation al player is that yer so hung up on the nest few hand or shoe. But then there is no long term for you cats. So are ya in or out of the baccarats challenge, hey hey?

 

Ohy and that shoe you pony up woulda capture me 3.65 units nets profits. So take the challenge and show all yer magic, hey hey!

 

You're so right short pants! I just started playing the other day and got lucky! Hehehe!

 

3.65 !!!!!!!!! Yowza! But wait! Doesn't that mean you got to regress to your mean of 1.27? So ah lemme see, hmmmm.... next shoe you lose 2.38 units to get to your peak? Nice!

No you ahole! Nobody is going to play your stupid game. Ya know why? Because they're too busy playing for real.

Do enjoy virtual betting Party Poker! Bwahahaha yourself, short pants.

 

Yup yer just a scared, chicken shits loser recreational player and retard. So I guess yer not gonna take the challenge, oh well maybe yer compatriot from across the pond will have some balls, hey hey.

 

Yeah I would rather play in a regular casino and make 2-3 units per shoe. It would be more useful if we just see everybody’s methods and test them ourselves to see if they work. If they do, report it here and that’s just one more bit of ammo we have against the casino.

 

Uh yeah, that's the thing and ya can't test a subjective style after the fact. Ya need to test the subjective style in real times on a fly. Cats anin't gotta reveal the bolt and nut of their style and they ain't gotta tell how they make the "majick" or "secret sauce. I will provide the shoe result one hand at a time and, and give a coupla few minutes between hand so cats can declare what they will do for the next hand. So, say first hand is player then cat declare so 2 units on bankers they input 2UB, or 1uP for a one units bet on players or the simple NB if they wish to no bet the next hand. Eazy peezy Japaneezy baby, so who's in, hey hey????

 

I’m okay with being given a shoe that I can show you how I play it hand by hand. I’m not afraid to see a shoe and lose it if that’s what happens. I don’t really have time to spend online waiting for a hand to be played. I’m also happy to give live shoes showing what it is I’m doing. I don’t reverse engineer results. Every shoe I would analyze would have consistent rules.

 

Nobody because it is a boring time consuming endeavor with no upside.

Why don't you just tell folks what your trigger or imbalance wait on the Player side is so they can decide to go for Banker 1.27 units a shoe or not. LOL. What are you so afraid of? I promise I won't bother to test it against my "ready to go" 693 shoes the way I tested your 12 step losing fiasco. I don't care. Anyway, who do you think is going to sit and play your method? You've said it yourself, "you can hand someone a winner on a silver platter and they won't play it" or something to that effect.

 

You have no idea how impressed I am that you got "Yowza" "Bwahahaha" and "Regression to Mean" in a single coherent post.

I usually add a Greek or Norse mythology reference when talking about math. I like your tack better.

My father always said you can lead a horse to water, but you can't molest them while they are trying to drink without animal rights activists getting upset. (On second thought I may have misheard that, never mind)

Just really liked the "Yowza" I literally haven't heard that in 30 years. Brings back mem--- Awesome neto peachy-keen.

 

Nah, yer a chicken shits, scared, loser recreational player and you won't participate because you'll be exposed, and yer drived road nonsense. Hey a strikes rate of a paltry 54% should yield a nets profit of 3 units per shoe on a fats bet basis and surely you can do better than that, right?

 

Oh well, perhaps the gizmotard will participate and make the scene readin randoms to the 60% strikes right, and I'll be suitably impress, hey hey.

 

Sigh. My quest for 55% falling short which keeps me from flat betting. Bit at 53.2% still getting 4 units a shoe.

See my post "how much can you win" I'm really beginning to believe that's all there is in this game. But it's better than 1 unit. Not thst there is anything wrong with 1 umit.

I don't need to prove my bona-fide to you. Everyone here knows I'm a long time regular player and so do you.

Nobody wants to bother with your stupid challenge, Hugh. Maybe you should try goading them into wasting their time with your schoolboy taunts.

You have become irrelevant.

 

@Frank Kneeland . That's the first post I ever read from you. I suppose your intention is for me to engage you? Not likely.

 

Yup, the mohegans sun retard goes back on iggy, hey hey.

 

LOL. WIsh you were here, Toddler.

But it's my understanding that this is an unplayable shoe for JAE.

 

We’d make $50 on this shoe. Chicken scratch. But yeah, our primary bankroll wouldn’t have seen any action.

 

Why? Where's the -20? Or is there another rule I don't know?