Roulette A simple question for Sir Anyone

In reality, there is a part of randomness in horse racing (jockey/driver bad decision/horse injury/horse bad mood/obstruction/horse having to run outside the pack etc...) which cannot be predicted before the race happening. But this can be overcome thanks to the payout that can be known beforehand and the knowledge of your selection % win rate. The equation can give a positive result.

 

Turbo, your forehead is bleeding.

 

If what you want to explain has nothing to do with horse racing then don't take this game as an example, we know that logic is not part of your brain construction but you could make an effort.
Take "3 people enters the Casino" instead. Who will order the first drink, who will go to pee first, who will have the first winning bet? who will hit the second and who the last?. Can you answer those questions?. GRIN.

 

Turbo,

Some day you're going to have to dazzle us with your supposed high IQ by using some math. To date, I've never seen you use it or even demonstrate a rudimentary knowledge of basic probability. LOL!

 

Turbo,

For a dog to come in second another dog has to come in first.
For a dog to come in third another dog has to come in second. LoL!!!

 

If the jockey falls off the horse saddle before the finish line, then the second horse becomes first and the third becomes second. The winner is "disqualified". Randomness is cruel but Turbo will enlight us with "the time machine" hoping he includes the construction notice.

 

The aggressive equation:
(-2.7x1)+(-2.7x2)+(-2.7x4)+(-2.7x8)+(-2.7x16)+(-2.7x32)+(-2.7x64)+(-2.7x128)= + ...............

The ultimate aggressive equation:
(-2.7x1)+(-2.7x5)+(-2.7x25)+(-2.7x125)= + ...............

You have one hour pupils and remember nothing is IMPOSSIBLE, don't get your brain "tight" and stuck to "one spin" and "independant events".

 

If one horse each is transported to Saturn on each space craft...

 

I don't post. For obvious reasons. I don't get why you're so ignorant.

Turbo's trying to give you clues, without sharing the full system. Again, for obvious reasons.

Just because you don't get it, and because your ego is screwed, doesn't mean you should make fun of this guy. Take a pencil and paper and try to figure it out. It's not that hard.

Many have the grail. They just don't want to share it with you. I'm certain if you would have it, you wouldn't share it, right?

Yes, casinos have the edge. Some numbers end up beyond STD, some below. Overall, they make the edge. You can play one number and earn $1000. Another guy will play another and will lose $1200. Casinos profit. The grail is to find out how to pick up the numbers which end up above STD. Simple as that. And as Turbo said, around 10 - 13 numbers would make you win. Every single time. It's not that hard.

 

And the Winner is: (easy one for Turbo)

 

It's true. You add that to Ken's hot number methods and you should have just about all you'll need.

 

without giving this much thought, answer (3) is the closest result based on random, in my opinion

 

.........more respect to the gamblers who , at roulette , are choosing and betting only 1 or 2 numbers .


N.D.

 

...or perhaps selecting more, from which 1 or 2 become significant bets

 

bozadj, the reason Turbo is giving "clues" and not sharing his "full system" it is because he has done that in the past, especially on Gambler's Glen, claiming already it was the HolyGrail, some people like me hand tested his systems and showed him the negative result, at first we get insulted, but after he had to apologize and recognize he was wrong and his systems were failures. Therefore to not make a fool of himself again, of course he won't share a step by step system because I would code it immediately and show the negative curve to everybody, he does not want that obviously, he prefers to maintain the Myth of the Graal Saint by giving us now horse racing and dogs and even robots example to explain us how random works, that is so funny that I had to participate to his sketch.

Concerning the 13 numbers that are hitting above expectation, you know them AFTERWARDS, you can't predict them or even ONE of them BEFORE the results are known, unless you have a guessing gift power, but certainly not with Maths. Because the maths of the game of Roulette, which is an independant events game (the ball is taken out of the wheel each spin and respun with 37 possible results for which one win is paid 35 units+1chip return, a total of 36 units give a negative expectation of 2,7%.)

I know where Turbo wants to direct the uneducated people like you: the horses, or dogs, or pussies leading in the race are the most likely to be the winner of the race. Same for his Roulette theory, the leading numbers will be winners in the future (at least one of them like TG likes to claim), and with some sort of aggressive progression, we would be UP at some moment in the session. This is unfortunately not true, and if TG was able to pick at least 1 number hitting above expectation, he would flat bet, not using a progression to cover the losses (bad choices). This is counting on luck, if you pick 13 numbers randomly before the very first spin, you will be as right as TurboGenius who is betting on the numbers that already appeared or repeated.

TG is 4th at Roulette Simulator, he made 400K very quickly, and now for months he is stuck there, despite having the HolyGrail? (can't lose one session etc..?). Something does not add up .

No harm bozadj, but you are either TG with an alias or a roulette beginner.

 

I just checked Roulette Simulator. Check guys at position 2 and 3. They're making random bets, with full 3000 budget, trying some luck. From Turbo's screenshots, he seems to win pretty consistently around $2000 per game. For like 150 games. What? I'm not on Turbo's side. I don't give a damn about Turbo or you. Or anyone else. I just want to tell you not to give up, if you like the game. You can win. It's not that hard. Again.

You can't know which number will hit. But, for example, you want to hit a number which will hit 7 times in 111 spins. As STD rarely (let's say never) goes above 3.5, you can say that 3s are excluded from the list while 6s are there. We already excluded a lot of numbers, right? How can we exclude other numbers? Hmmm... Use RouletteXtreme and run 111 spins for, let's say — 20 times. Check out how STD behaves for top hit numbers. When a number starts behaving in not desired way, remove it if you play it. Target numbers which hit above 1 STD. Remove numbers that are going cold.

Why it's so hard?

I'm not sure whether I'm playing the same way as Turbo. Probably yes, from what I read. I don't care.

You, Bago, obviously subconsciously believe there's the HG. Why would you waste your precious time on this forum?

It looks like you're a roulette beginner, my friend. No hard feelings

 

You don't need to know which numbers will hit above STD. Start playing a number once it hits above 1 std (zscore, more precisely.) If it gets cold, remove it. Numbers going hot will stay. Remove other numbers going cold. Numbers going hot will stay. Put a progression on them, they're good, award them, they're bringing you profit. Just think a little. It's not that hard.

 

And don't be stupid to bet on numbers which hit above 3 std