TurboGenius Advantage of Repeaters explained - part 3 - 2020

I have codified a new idea which as we can see is not successful in the long term.
The idea is based on the horse race (Top 3). We bet on all the numbers that already appeared in the previous round. If we reach the sixth round and we have no profit (>= 100 units) we start a new race of six rounds (with new numbers to bet on) but this time we double the bet on each number. Stop loss of 5000 units.

Example:

1x | 2 | 36 | 25 |
2x | 5 | 24 | 36 | -> bet 36
3x | 7 | 24 | 31 | -> bet 36 and 24
4x | 7 | 21 | 18 | -> bet 36, 24 and 7

I attach a ".pdf" file with results from 728 sessions and almost 200,000 spins.

I have made variations on this:
- more and less aggressive progressions
- number of laps in the race
- limiting the bet selection to just a dozen
and other small variations.

The result was the same. No long-term benefits.

Any new ideas on this?

Thanks!!!

 

So what is the new idea here I can't see any advantage!

 

hi @atrox23, I, like you, have tried dozens of ideas based on the same theories, but I have not yet seen any advantage.

 

I think based on my observation moving out of that top 3 box and taking the whole sett in our calculation and decision would have better results. Applying the avg, but I don't even like the avg also as it just that average..

 

This is like what I mentioned, but logically a little different in one aspect.
You should only play the third time a consecutive number comes out.
That means that if 36 has not come out for the third time in the next row of 3, you stop betting it for 3x.
The same for 24 in 4x and so on.
Try it like this and we'll see how it goes.

 

We have unlimited time to see how million of ideas will go...

 

Example:

1x | 2 | 36 | 25 |
2x | 5 | 24 | 36 | -> bet 36
3x | 7 | 24 | 31 | -> bet 36 and 24
4x | 7 | 21 | 18 | -> bet 36, 24 and 7
Quos
look too part one.
TG would say I'll run of spins. So, eventually the 1x must have repeated #5 1st in that stream.
You now have #5 to bet. I'll run more of the stream. As the 2x show, #7 must be the 1st repeat, going 3x.
Now you bet 5&7. I'll run off more of the stream.
#7 hits
Let's assume the 4x stream has a repeat #20, so 5&7 missed. You now bet #'s 5-7-20 for stream 5x. That's just 3 numbers.

This stream wins 278 units. Just doing part 1.
In figure it out you are being shown, have 10 spins and then pick 4 number that have not shown. Forget that.
Part 1 gets its 1st # @18th spin #13. Spin 22, #13 hits. Next spin is #10, 1st repeat of new stream.
You have 2 #'s, 13-10.
If you look at end of stream, last 2 #'s are 10-4.
After picking up #4 after we got the #10. You see the profit. #'s 10-4

You can see only 5 numbers in play.

If you look back 5&7 spins, is #15 in play?

A few too many wont be able to see it

 

Every time i see you writing i am saying i will not participate but i can't. WTF are you seeing here so a few too many won't see it REALY?
What you have post is just a typical session and nothing more!

 

NBN i will ask you Politely for specific proof , examples or detailed explanation , i'd love to see how that works—could you walk me through it? You don't need to be afraid as turbo has post everything ...
If you struggle to provide coherent answers, it highlights the gaps that you and all we have...
Test or Trial : If possible, a small-scale test to see the solution in action.
Sometimes people genuinely believe they have a solution, even if it’s not complete.
This has to stop with anyone like you jumping in and pretend or share clue's...

 

atrox
So, you don't know how too use ADV:1.

 

You didn't answer nothing on the above. You think you know that's the problem here.
“You’ve talked about this solution a lot—if it actually works, prove it with real results.”
“You’ve mentioned a solution multiple times, but I haven’t seen any real evidence. Why should we believe it’s different this time?”
You’ve been talking about this fix for a while, but without evidence, it’s hard to take it seriously.
“Until I see actual proof, I’m not interested in hearing more about this.”

 

Atrox like nemo says no spoon feeding you. But I'll point you where to start.
Go look at Winkels GUT theory. There's only 3 parts to it.
1. starts larger group.
2. its then a 50/50 section.
3. Repeats. Why repeats, they've become the larger
If you then read WTF by Next year and read what Celticknits says; you might finally get somewhere.

 

How is possible that someone don't know where to go point others where to go ? I would prefer you to act like nimo give as your last post and go make your millions rather than giving me where to go and what to read! You don't have the ability to fed others so that is pointless to say it.. Any way my bad losing my time with you..

 

Quos this is the best example that was posted from 6-th sense , and it is similar to AOR1 .
We record numbers i pairs , so our two first numbers will be our first pair and so on, for exacts roules you have to read the thread. This is again based on our repeat hunting and how numbers distribute on a 37 space game...

I will add some numbers ;
We start betting after we have a repeat, cw orr ccw

Spin
1-36
2-21

Table;



Spin
1-36
2-21
3-36 ( here we start betting 21 as we have a repeat on 36)


Spin
1-36
2-21
3-36
4-29
5-2
6-28
7-19
8-3
9-37
10-33
11-30
12-5
13-29 (here we add to our bet 21-2) we bet then all the spins


Etc , this is similar to the shit we are hunting and more simple than ever , of course there is more to it...

 

Check the distribution of 1x in a cycle of 60 spins!

 

37 Cycle!

 

I did continue a bit the last session, the main problem remain the progression! If we start with 4 numbers we know that we have a spin cycle of 9 attempts, if we add another number that drop down based on the total Nr played then i have to raise otherwise it will take me long to recover the lost spins even with a stop and start trigger.. But as 6-th said ,IF we go for something that has to happen then we can calculate the cost off it in the worst case?

 

Hi @atrox23 , could you explain how we test the system of your last chart?

Thanks

 

Random game Quos.

 

More stats.
We play two 2x until first 3x come out.

Wins: 57%
Loss: 43%

Units bets per game (avg): 21.24

It doesn't work either.

I have manually tested and coded dozens of ideas and variants already!!!