Roulette An OLD method from Turbo, I VERY MUCH like it

Its too good of a method to simply file in the trash bin. (a little tweaking maybe?) All in all, its damn good imo. Keep in mind, dont ask too many questions, its doubtful you'll get answers. >> [b[/b]http://www.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=1063.0

./index.php?topic=16141.0

http://www.rouletteforum .cc/index.php?topic=16141.0

 

That post is 7 pages long, I explained how it's played - and explained it again with example(s).
It took off and people made their own variations (which is what's supposed to happen).
92 Replies
25,113 Views
Is there a question that wasn't answered ?

 

First, I hate commenting on items from Sparky (lol)

Also, when people comment (questions) over at VLS, they do so from topics that are 5+ years old (for some reason they dont look at the dates). So they'll ask something to the author and when they dont get a reply, they get all pissed off about it. We have some authors of methods there that are actually dead, no lie. It was meant as no disrespect to you, it was more of.....dont waste time asking questions on an OLD thread. BTW.....I really do like this method.

(I hate this Sparky stuff, I really do !!)

Ken

 

I like it too Sparky, I mean Ken
It just never panned out properly for me to keep working on it.

 

As God is my witness, 2-4 numbers (no progression) is THE answer

Ken