Roulette Ask Me Anything About Betting the EC's (Even Chances)

BS! So it's been how long since the last destructive ice age? We have climate records going back about 150 years. We have ice core data from the ice cap. My favorite baloney festival part of all this is how sure they all are. Never mind that tree ring evidence shows times where carbon dioxide was in higher concentrations in the past and there was no green house effect. It all comes down to what science you want to use to manipulate suckers with. Take your magical math that can't predict when a win streak will start, how long it will last, and when it will end. And yet this is the basis for your cornball "absolutism." Just consider this. You asphalt and concrete vast areas in almost all urban metropolises that radiates heat and maintains a heat sink source that radiates into the atmosphere every day. It's not carbon and carbon futures on a carbon stock exchange. That's money from suckers. It's all about not admitting that all that heat absorption and radiation from parking lots and roadways is the real cause. Just how many of the testing equipment is located in hot cities? I don't like junk science and those that try to sell it. I don't like you because you try to make fake news claims that guessing equals prediction.

 

This alone defines the limitations of your ability to perceive logic. I see win streaks all the time that are not done once I recognize them. Here is the reason you only see them when they are done. You are addicted to seeing trends that end just as you see them. So you are doing the right thing and never using them to an advantage. I knew a guy that had the same luck with women. He has 12 kids now and drives them all around in his VW bug with his 300lb wife.

 

The only reason I do not see visions of win streaks in my head is because I am not mentaly unballanced. There is alot of things I know and understand from my experience. One of the things I understand is the Martingale is a very dangerous progression unless you have a strategy that gives you a good hit within 4 or 5 trys. My strategy always puts me on the right side of a streak. When they happen, I am there betting with them.

 

Its fascinating how such a type of thread gets so much responses & activity - in a mere single day ..
meanwhile, a post/thread of smth that wins consistently is dismissed.

I guess that old adage is entirely right, correct:
if you printed the winning system on the casino walls it would get overlooked.

With each successive day, I am more & more convinced of this being entirely true.

 

You mean to say for you it's not possible. I've been doing it for 17 years will continue to do it. Your math religion prevents you from taking advantage of obvious flaws in the game. Oh well.

 

My job is to protect my bankroll at all times and taking unnecessary risks doesn't do that.

 

I don't win one unit a day I win one unit a session and I play more than one session a day. Luck has nothing to do with anything, luck is for losers.

 

I've never claimed to predict anything, predictions are for weathermen. I make accurate educated guesses which is totally different than a prediction. How much faith would you have in a weatherman who told you he was going to guess tomorrow's weather. I cannot predict what's coming next by looking at past outcomes I can only make a very narrowly defined guess

 

Any other good news about RC Bet Selions or compromise and go after the A S 3 system /

 

bet selections . for you in Rio Linda . o m Rio Li

 

I really don't give a fuck about your climate nonsense, it has nothing to do with gambling.

You are the reason there is a climate issue at all. It is just a vehicle to hitch your wagon to and get milage from, that's why you introduced it here.

So shut the fuck up about it.

You're as corrupt as they come, handwaving and nonsense. The great Jizzatron spurting his rancid seed all over the forums.

 

Your bankroll is 5 peanuts, taking it to a big 31 peanuts is nothing when you get the job done more efficiently.

But your story is starting to fall apart and sounding more and more like a big lie, you obviously do have drawdowns of more than 5 peanuts. You go into the hole big time and just pretend you don't on here.

This is why you can't use a 5 step martingale because YOU WOULD BE WIPED OUT.

There are many ways to catch out a liar and you just gave it away.

 

A guess is a prediction.

Acting on the guess and expecting a better outcome than 50% is making and backing the prediction. You expect your prediction to be right 80% of the time.

You sit there and claim you are not predicting and whilst also claiming a 80% hit rate that beats random.

You are using your euphemism "educated guess" in place of prediction because you know you are selling everyone a big fat lie.

How do you lie straight in bed?

 

Hi Spike, I congratulate you on your roulette experience and I'm glad you were successful. If you allow me, I would like to participate in this thread and ask you a question: which casino and roulette would you recommend and why?

Regards

 

And it's my job to protect those five peanuts. I could use any progression I want, the Martingale will be the last one I would choose. But I only flat bet because it gets the job done and gives me the least amount of exposure. I'm not a gambler, never have been. I was brought up by my father to be risk-adverse, to be frugal and to believe in savings and you never spend your money foolishly. I stumbled onto roulette completely by accident and I'm certainly not going to change my entire personality because everybody around me who gives me advice are compulsive gambling addicts who look at money in a completely opposite way than I do. Risk your money and throw it around anyway you like there, Sparky, I will take the safe and secure route every time. Gambling is stupid, that's why I never do it. Never bought a lottery ticket in my life would never even occur to me. Yet I'm supposed to risk a hundred units to win one unit? That's the very definition of insanity.

 

Nope. A prediction is much more sophisticated and has corroborating evidence to back it up. You gather all the evidence and make a prediction, like a weatherman does. A guess is more of an opinion then a prediction. There is no evidence in roulette because you are dealing with independent outcomes. All you can do is guess.

 

I only play online now and I don't see a difference between any of the live wheels. Always play single zero roulette whenever you can, double zero roulette has an annoyance all of the extra zero.

 

I agree my friend.
People would rather fight than win at roulette, that's a fact.

 

spike why not shut everyone up, prove you can do it, win 1 unit a day every day for a thousand days on liveroulette.com dublin sit
use a news paper as time stamp proof of live stream

you do that then no one can touch you or say anything negative about you


but u wont cause you know u r a croc of shit until then put up or shutup

 

Like Spike, I rule out the martingale. I do not know of a betting system that improves with it proportionally to the increase in risk. On the other hand, it unbalances the risk-benefit ratio, which I prefer to be equitable or to risk less than the expected reward.