Baccarat Baccarat Trend Following

Seen this often, usually the young show pony betting orange, they don’t last long. Couple of days straight then never see them again, just like the martybationists, blow and go, limp coks
Longevity is a selection criteria and unit bet size benchmark , thanks

 

Then, what does he have against betting the player? I know the advantages of betting the banker and even Michael Shackleford says to only bet the banker, but with the 5% commission on the banker wins doesn't it even out in the end?

I've seen plenty of shoes where the player wins dominated them, but I suppose there are more banker win shoes on the average?

I went crabbing for long hours today and caught like 6 dozens and had a feast. I'm tired from crabbing in the hot sun, but I'm going to go down and try my luck. I'm going to start with something else besides baccarat like the $20 minimum Pai Gow Tiles as the Tiles game does not require thinking. Hopefully, I don't end up losing, because if I do then I'll be jumping right into a $100 minimum baccarat table.

But, at least this time, I will have the advantage of what I learned from Punkcity's Stadium thread.

 

Check his threads why he only bets bank. It’s logical to him and his betting/selection method, to me that’s fine and I have always supported his endeavours. He is a person that has found something he’s comfortable with, he’s not changing his actions and is prepared to grind out his on average 2 unit per shoe wins. Good work I say. Shows discipline etc.
What he fails to understand is his dising of others is just bullshit due to him being bored. He’s played a gazillion shoes, has the runs on the board and this is his way of gloating, fair enough but I really don’t pay his adverse remarks much attention as I say he’s bored and shit stirring the newbies. Lol. Cheers

 

I'm sorry to see some of you guys don't see this as clearly as I do Play on

 

Nope, you don’t get it.
Impractical at a real casinoverse, most real casinoverse will not let you play with laptops at table or stadium, to do the same thing with a sheet of paper also impractical.
It’s a good concept if one could actually find the person or website to access the program, would be useful if eventually getting access to program and one could access online casinoverse and play at home. Also you don’t do the content any favours with your naive comments.

So nope, you don’t get it.
Most of the people here do.

 

Not only that but to trust the board at a live casino is foolish at best. Mistakes are made frequently. If you could do it at home you can enter each result for the program to assist you that way. The only way that can be done.

 

I found the segment on the Market Structure interesting with the HH and HL.
It's always good to see how different people visualize things and then try to adopt it to a style of play.

 

The thing is I have a sheet that I take to the casino I never have problems with using it ,,,,,,Its just drawing x's and O's thats not hard at all .....

 

You guys take that sheet and put your losing shoes in it then you will understand ........

 

Hmmm, after about 10 minutes, I skimmed through the rest of the video and perhaps I missed the whole point. I'll watch it again and see if I end up with a different opinion.

 

Borgata has gone mad with their baccarat table minimums.

Last night, they had only 4 live tables open and 2 were at $40 and the other 2 were at $500 minimum (one in the high roller pit and one in the Asian pit). Where the heck are the $100 and $200 minimum tables?

It was Tuesday night for Pete's sake and there weren't that many people in the casino.

The Tiles game I wanted to play was at $40 also and if that's the case, I would rather play baccarat and I did and that was a mistake. Absolutely no trends and nothing but total chaos in two full shoes at the $40 minimum tables and I probably bet no more than 20 each in both shoes and I managed to survive winning 1 unit overall. Everyone except 1 guy lost everything as it was just a total crap shoot.

On the other hand, the $500 minimum table right behind us had a plenty of long single and double chops in one of the derived boards. Based on how I would have played the shoe, the minimum I would have won was 6 units and possibly up to 10 units if I wouldn't chicken out because of the high minimum and stick to the plan. That translates to $3,000 to $5,000 in winnings minus the commission.

One player in the middle of the $500 table made out really good betting 1K on the long single chop and he cleared at least 6K before the pattern broke, but it went right back to the single chop after a few 2's so if he kept on betting like it's still the single chop, he would have cleared 10K at least. It was the same guy who came over to the $40 table because of the shuffle at the $500 table and he won when everyone else lost . I asked him a couple of times what he was looking at to make his bets when he was the only one who won and he said a pattern in Bead Plate and Main Road, so he wasn't even looking at any of the derived boards and considering how messy the derived roads were I guess what he did worked.

 

Some of us who are familiar with forex futures like me do see it clearly. I personally think it does has merit and look forward to your future videos.