Roulette Betting the last five numbers. StRanGe bUt tRuE

Strange, but true.

1. If a number has hit within the last five spins, it really is slightly more likely to hit on the next spin.

2. Simply playing the last five numbers to have hit will slightly reduce the house edge, especially when the wheel speed is close to the speed of the previous spin. In rare cases, you can get a small edge on some wheels playing this way.

 

What is the math behind this?

 

The roulette wheel doesn't know or care what hit in the past five spins

What changes?

What causes this to lower the HE?


The next spin has same chances as any other

 

What do you believe causes the lower HE ?

Why do you suppose some numbers are more likely hit to than others on a live wheel?

 

Your saying betting the last 5 numbers that hit lower the HE

How so?

 

What is YOUR best guess as to why it does, especially on the wheels here in the US? What does your experience tell you may be taking place?

 

You are saying the math changes by betting 5 select numbers based on the previous 5 spins

How does the math change??

Make me a have a Hillary balloon moment

 

Again, what do you believe is behind the change?

Apply some critical thinking skills here and explain what you think is taking place. If you show some effort, then I'll go into more detail.


Hillary's face is so disgusting. Four years of that is going to be unbearable.

 

That last part gets a like

 

I am in a casino a few night a week sometimes, and the baccarat table is in clear view of 2 roulette tables. We can see their scoreboards easily. Although I don't play roulette, someone is always commenting on the numbers. I will tell you, at times I see certain numbers repeating but that is not the majority of the times by far. The majority of times there are NOT repeating numbers but numbers close by those that just won, like say 7 hit, the next is 6 or 8 or 9, etc. But if I was to wager on what the OP said, I know 100% I would lose my bankroll easily.

 

On American wheels - 38 numbers can't show in 38 spins.
That means there are going to be repeats.
There are roughly 12 times during those 38 spins then when a number repeats.
That means on average after 38 spins you will have a repeat on average every 3.16 spins
Most of these come late in a 38 spin session - but by spin 5 you can expect one from the last 5 to repeat on average.
I'm assuming this is where the post is going so throwing that out.

 

I don't believe this though

 

Would you like to see proof?

I can demonstrate it on skype.

 

I can program RX to play/bet the last 5 numbers at all times - and load up actuals.
It shows no advantage - but of course RX can't factor in the wheel speed since it's not measured.
But you did say "in rare cases" so yes - in rare cases there will be an advantage (laughs) due to
the fact that some sessions will result in better than average results and some result in less than average results.
So of course - yes... it can provide an advantage but not one that stands up to long term tests.

 

You only have single zero data from Weis data, where the wheel alternates spin direction. All of my data is live US data, where each spin remains the same from one spin to the next.

 

Making wild assumptions again

 

I doubt that RX comes with any single direction wheel data. As far as I know it's all single zero data from Europe.
However, my spins are live from the US. More than a million.

 

I load text files from my 00 actual spins... but regardless...