Roulette Camembert cheese with d´Alembert

An idea struck Salvador Dali when he saw a piece of Dalembert cheese melting in the sun. Then he painted his famous melting clock. How time flies! But let´s go back to the French Age of Enlightenment for a minute. A leading figure then was Jean-Baptiste le Rond d´Alembert. Of course we first and foremost think of his roulette progression. One step up as we lose. And if possible one step down when we win on one of the simple chances. From the initial bet 1 chip it is simply not possible to reduce our bet.
"There´s only one step down from here, baby".

Three losses followed by three wins are good for the d´Alembert player.
But if the three wins come before the three losses, the balance is not at all reflected in higher bets.

The progression might be adapted to one Dozen or one Column. One step up as we lose.
And if possible TWO steps down as we win.

But wait a second! According to Claus Koken ("Roulette: Computersimulationen und Wahrscheinlichkeitsanalyse von Spiel und Strategien") and other experts THE MOST RARE DOZEN
MIGHT APPEAR ONLY 1/4 OF ALL SPINS FOR A VERY LONG TIME.

So a better choice there might be one step up after losing
and possibly THREE steps down after winning.

 

There´s only one step down from here, baby.
It´s called the land of permanent bliss.
Now what´s a sweetheart like you doing in a dumb like this?
(Bob Dylan)

The mimimun bet is fatal in more than one respect. At my B&M Casino the minimum bets on the outside (bets on Dozens and so forth and so on)
are rather high compared to six line bets or street bets.

So I suggest that you choose four streets instead of a dozen.
You do not need to start with all four at the same time. Start with one.
Add one more after losing.
Add one chip to the street with FEWEST chips after each loss.
In this way the chips are being more evenly distributed.

Remove (if possible) THREE chips from the street where you just one.
and simply repeat.

 

Remove (if possible) THREE chips from the street where you just WON.
And simply repeat.

But I might have been too eager to keep the bets low.
To return to square one and maybe lose an overall profit on the four chosen streets.

At the lowest steps it might be better to just remove ONE chip from the street where you just won.
From 3 to 2, from 2 to 1, and from 1 to no bet there.
Hits with 4 chips or more: Three steps down as before.

 

For the d'alembert on ECs, have you considered starting with more units at the beginning?
Say we start on 10. Win, bet 9. etc etc.
This gives more opportunity to decrease the bets if needed.
Have you (or anyone else) studied how this works out?

 

Starting with more units at the beginning
is one way to avoid the imbalance caused by the minimum bet. The idea is not new.
But if the minimum bet on ECs is high in itself, it might require much more money.
And still the balance in the d´Alembert player could be disturbed by the basic fact that
total balance, i.e. an equal number of Red and Black spins, do not have to show today or tomorrow.

As you can see, I have moved away from the ECs and the original version.

 

Thanks, I am still looking at EC to make things as simple as possible, before moving on to anything else.
What I like is that you could have more losses than wins, but still profit, if I am correct. ( This is because with this system, if losses= wins, profit= number of wins. But we will be in profit by at least 1 unit before this happens. )