Baccarat Can Betting on Birthdays Make You Rich?

I solve this dilemma and the Ahtor in the article is wrong.
You can cover all possibilities or should I say there is a way around the poor conclusions he makes about equilibrium.

See attachment

Note - I play for entertainment and use Mr Oops Dealer Signature and considering using this strategy in my portfolio.
Just saying that roulette is a mug game, but you sure can crack some stats and have some fun with it.

Cheers

 

Disclaimer: I only play for entertainment so this topic is about entertainment and having some fun.

Baccarat - Roulette - Craps - Sic Bo

Cheers

 

Just finished writing a PDF step-by-step description and discovered during the process that you cover all possibilities with at most eight attempts.

Happy Winnings & Happy Hunting

 

Hello - update - we getting the method coded

Cheers

 

I crack both the math expert's wrong assumptions that you not can cover all betting possibilities and the original Ahtour of the Eriscott method.
No one had the solution I come up with using a simple cancellation exclusion method for decision making.

And it does not end here.

We now know it takes eleven attempts to cover all possibilities with no triggers and the whole sequence of twenty-four outcomes.
Using a trigger takes at most eight attempts to cover all possibilities.

Now I will test this on a rolling basis with no triggers and see how it would perform catching two repeats.
As we play for a bias and there is balance and imbalance, it should be interesting.

But in any situation, we have 99,76 favouring winning at least once and 0,14 to fail.
But the odds are a little stronger favouring our side because some losing sequences unfold in such a way that we still win, so not all losing sequences are losing sequences because we have a loophole that is created by how equilibrium unfolds.

Cheers

 

what does that even mean what is your system

 

Intuitive betting

So I had some reflection and thoughts about intuitive betting.
And we know that if we cover 24 outcomes from the beginning, it will take eleven attempts.

But I discovered two things, first, we don't need to place all eleven attempts.
Because we can exclude bets, and cancel bets that are unnecessary.
So we can reduce the overall eleven attempts and the total too much less.

And here comes the point about - Intuitive Betting - when being selective and reducing the attempts we can also choose when to jump in and take action.

For example, I made three fictive bets and came up with six unique patterns.
Then is two left and five attempts to cover all possibilities, being selective.
If not I would still risk less than eleven attempts as I would have eight cover the whole sequence of 24 outcomes not alternating with no repeat.

Cheers

 

I will post one example with today's random org file.

Cheers

 

Here is one example, starting after the trigger of four unique formations, using an Intuitive betting selection procedure to determine when to bet.
This is the LW-Registry:

LLW
W
W
W
LW
LLW
LW
LLW
W
LW

And here is today's random org file output with qualifying samples:

0 0 1
1 1 1
0 0 0 L
1 0 1
0 1 0 L Start betting LLW
1 1 0 L
0 1 0 W

- - -

0 0 0
1 1 0
1 0 0
0 0 1 L
0 0 1 W Start betting W

- - -

1 1 0
1 1 1 L
0 0 0
1 0 1 L
1 1 1 W Start betting W

- - -

0 1 1
1 1 0
0 0 1
1 0 1
0 1 1 W Start betting W

- - -

1 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
1 1 0
1 0 1 L Start betting LW
1 0 0 W

- - -

1 1 0
0 0 0
0 1 0
1 1 1 L
0 0 1 L Start betting LLW
0 1 0 L,W

- - -

1 0 1
1 0 0 L
0 0 0
0 0 1 L
1 1 1 L Start betting LW
0 1 1 W

- - -

1 1 0
1 1 1 L
0 1 0
0 0 1
1 0 1 L Start betting LLW
0 1 1 L
0 1 0 W

- - -

1 0 1
0 0 1
0 0 0 L
0 1 0 L
0 0 0 W Start betting W

- - -

0 1 0
0 0 1
0 0 0 L
0 1 1 L
1 1 0 L Start betting LW
0 1 1 W

 

I am sorry. I do not understand anything that you posted.

 

Well, I decided to share the full solution with cps10 and Jimskey and one coder who I talk to on a daily basis.
If they are interested, I for sure got the coder's attention.

After that, it will be from friend to friend.
Is for me easy to understand, but is very complex to explain as there are so many different combinations and you exclude a cancellation with each one of them with different decision-making.

So is not meant to be for everyone.
But I am so impressed by cps10 and hes knowledge when it comes to staking that from this moment forward I look up to him with respect and admire hes ways of tackling things.
Did not read or see these parts from him earlier, my loss and missing out.

So if you want to find something of value I can strongly recommend the most recent topic at this section.
For sure a really interesting read to learn from.

 

Thank you for the kind words. I am happy to help you in any way I can.

 

How did the coding turn out?

Are the results as you expected? @Sputnik