Roulette CelticCasino Challenge

Turbo the liar has not ignored me like he said he would. He does not like to be annoyed by someone speaking the truth. You are a public danger, that's why I decided to post here to warn people what a fruitcake and pathological liar you are with your holygrails stories. You have already done that in the past:

Bago Posted: 17-Dec-06 07:38
Edit

Profile
TurboGenius

Do you confirm you have the holy grail or you found out it is in fact the holy crap? Do you remember the PM at your forum, you told me it was based on playing a single number for a long time, and i am 100% sure you were talking about the Gambler's Fallacy =). You know like me a number can stay too much time in a negative STD and consequently busting since the progression is out of the table limits. What do you have to say about it and will you post your holy grail (if you have it) for Christmas?

TurboGenius Posted: 17-Dec-06 10:41
Edit

Profile
""Do you confirm you have the holy grail""
of course

""or you found out it is in fact the holy crap?""
no

""Do you remember the PM at your forum, you told me it was based on playing a single number for a long time""
yes and that is one way to do it that works.

""and i am 100% sure you were talking about the Gambler's Fallacy =).""
yes it is based only on gambler's fallacy.

""You know like me a number can stay too much time in a negative STD""
Yes that is correct - I also said that the number never needs to get to 0.00 std dev in order to get into profit.

""and consequently busting since the progression is out of the table limits.""
No, the table limits are never even approached - not even close, ever - if you simply use the proper progression.

""What do you have to say about it""
said it

""and will you post your holy grail (if you have it) for Christmas?""
I seriously doubt it

-
random has limits.
math beats a math game.
look at the big picture and not just the next 30 spins.



So, at this time your "holygrail" was based on playing the coldest (lowest STD deviation number) and playing in with a progression which was the mean - the actual hit count), for example the mean was 10 and the actual hit count 7 you would bet 3 units on the number.
You claimed it would ALWAYS CATCH UP, because in your silly gambler's fallacy brain, the coldest number will become hot. I ran simulations myself and found a losing session where it never catched up. YOU ATTACKED ME CLAIMING MY SESSION WAS NOT REALISTIC THAT I SURELY DELETED SOME ZEROS (which was the coldest number) TO MAKE YOUR SYSTEM LOSE!. AND NOT LONG AFTER THIS YOU REALIZED YOURSELF I HAD NEVER CHANGED ANYTHING YOU FOUND ALSO SOME SESSIONS WITH A BIAS RESULT ON RX SOFTWARE.

It is the same you recite now with your martingale on hot numbers. History repeats, and as you still have your mental problems It will continue.

I suggest you open your Celtic Casino account (you probably already did) but found (LIKE ME) that your holygrail tanked, so you stopped and found this marvellous excuse that you are blocked and cannot enter the online casino anymore.

 

I ignored you until I was told that you were spreading lies (as usual) about what I said.
Typical that you would do that. And now you're back on ignore - you are an idiot and you make it clear to everyone each time you post.

 

You prefer insulting than answering my post genius, you feel embarrassed I understand, already claimed having found the HolyGrail in 2006 based on the lowest STD deviation number, proves that you are nothing more than a pathologic liar and 11 years after you are still in the same state of disrepair.

 

This goes for everyone, even the posters I dont like. This goes for EVERYONE!! >> What is this, finding very old posts regarding such-n-such. The goofballs whose posts stay the same for 15+ years, "they" are the ones I would ignore. They dont adjust, they dont learn.

Roulette is a game that we NEED to constantly IMPROVE our ideas over the years as to what NO LONGER works (yes, a person can be wrong). The very thing that gets attacked, should be the same thing that gets an applaud. Why?

Turbo or myself or ANYONE really, has done the work in the past in order to tell you TODAY, "that" does not work.

2006? (lol) Really?

Ken

 

Why do you say TODAY? It has never worked from day 1.