Blackjack CONVERT EORs TO HUMAN COUNTING SYSTEM

Hi All,

My program can generate EORs and can simulate games once user input the "Human" counting system. I want to make my simulation program become fully automatic, less data input and generate "Human" counting system automatically.

I am thinking to convert generated EORs to a "Human" counting system with an additional sub-routine program. For example, the generated EOR from Ace to KING is ( 0.115, 0.105, 0.240, 0.230, 0.131, 0.121, 0.011, -0.701, -0.556, 0.103, 0.103, 0.103, 0.103), once we read it with naked eye, we know that the good counting system(with high correlation) is (+1, +1, +2, +2, +1, +1, 0, -7, -5, +1, +1, +1, +1), but how can we write a program codes to generate such a high correlation human counting system ?

My suggestions :-

1) Convert all EORs to absolute value(ABS) and identify the maximum EOR absolute value, ABS(EORmax).
2) Find the ratio of ABS(EORmax) / ABS(EORn), where n = 1,2, 3, . . . . 13.
3) Elimiate EORn if ratio ABS(EORmax) / ABS(EORn) > 10, OR ratio ABS(EORmax) / ABS(EORn) > 12 ?
4) After elimination process, find a multiplier factor :-

a) if ABS(EORmax) >= 0.1, multiplier factor = 10.
b) if 0.01 =< ABS(EORmax) < 0.1, multiplier factor = 100
c) if 0.001 =< ABS(EORmax) < 0.01, multiplier factor = 1000
d) . . . . .


5) Then apply this factor to all original generated EORs, and rounding up all new EORs (after apply multiplier factor)

6) Modifications . . . to find a more human friendly system. Instead of (+1, +1, +2, +2, +1, +1, 0, -7, -5,+1, +1, +1, +1), why don't we use (+1, +1, +2, +2, +1, +1, 0, -6, -6, +1, +1, +1, +1) ? Which I think it is more user friendly and still maintain high betting correlation.


The above procedures may good for common set of EORs but unable to cover certain awkward EORs set. Please give your comments and help to give ideas to improve above methodology so that it can cover 99% of all possible EORs sets. LOL

Thanks in advance.

James

Source.