Discussion in 'Miscellaneous Gambling Forum' started by David Gregory, May 17, 2022.
I think we all knew what SPIKE answer was going to be...lol...
Spike had given the correct blunt answer.
I have you figured out so well that I could write your replies for you. You responded back exactly word for word as I knew you would. I mean presenting a win/loss ledger that is not fabricated. When I post the last few pages of my ledger on this site it will contain the record of 251 games played. It is hand written in pencil in a 5 X 7 ruled notebook. I have no reason to fabricate this because if I did I would be a worse liar than you. My reason for posting this ledger is to show that using a Martingale progression along with a good MM and the proper starting bankroll may have some potential if knowing where to place the bet. I have been called insane many times for using a Marty progression. So, the best I can do is show what I have accomplished so far. I will not be accused of a falsified ledger if I post it. Just like you will not be accused either. So post it, we will accept it. Oh by the way, you missed telling me where I can click on history to see your results.
Hey Judge, read the response above I made to Spike above, we think alike, both of us being Texans. Texans hate BS more than any other people in the US. I have a strategy I would like to share with you. Get me your email address and I'll send it to you if you are interested.
It was not a correct blunt answer, it was another blunt excuse.
he seems very honest and real. He has website also and based on comments he has shared with viewers has made him most trustworthy and best roulette player i have ever seen
plus you can read quite lot by the body language and how person speaks what kind of person he is. I have seen so many fake peoples out there and their attitude is completely different. You simply have some intuition about it just like in roulette you take these bets you feel are going to happen now
Means nothing, you could have written it out last week and probably did. Right up front I'm calling you a liar and I need for you to prove that everything in that book is true. Obviously you cannot do this so this whole thing is pointless.
The only way you could ever prove what you do is to do it in front of witnesses in a real casino. This is well established and has been argued forever. Usually the people who do try to prove it in person in a casino in front of witnesses fall flat on their face as I'm sure you would. As I know you would.
This statement in itself is pure BS. Texans are known for telling 'tall tales', they have been doing it forever, telling bullshit stories is part of their heritage. If a Texan tells you the sun is shining better look out the window and make sure because he's probably not telling the truth.
I gave the only possible answer. Submitting a handwritten ledger online is a complete waste of time because I could have made the entire thing up, very easy to do. Even suggesting it is a stupid idea. But like I said stupid is as stupid does.
I can't send you email.
markosrondinelli is mine... If you can send one to me. gmail.com too.
I will submit it anyway because maybe I am stupid. But I am not a liar. You will never be able to produce the incredible results I will show because I have played the exact same flat betting strategy as you do. Knowing where and when to place the bet, looking to where it is playing my game and quitting after a win of one or two units. In the long run the strategy ends up in complete ruin. That's what inspired me to try a whole different approach.
You do realize that that's what all liars say, right? Years ago I knew an actual pathological liar who lied about everything and he swore up and down that he never lied. It was hilarious.
No you haven't, you have no idea what I do, absolutely none. If you did know you would be able to ask correct questions in my thread and you have no idea what questions to ask because you have no idea what an even chance flat betting winning system looks like. Gizmo would know the right questions to ask because he does basically what I do but he won't ask them because he doesn't need to, he already knows the answers. Want to get on the right track start studying his reading random thread but you never will because you think you already have all the answers. Why, you have the glorious Martingale mastered.. Snicker.. LOL
No strategy can win over the long run, but some are better than others. I programmed my strategy using WinCraps and posted these results a few years ago.
$500 buy-in. $10 min. bet. Average bet combined with odds is $30. These are 54,939 real dice rolls using Zumma and other sources, representing 458 hours of play. Ending BR $8,238.
Bbbbbbbbbbbbwwwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaah, the spike will NEVER expose his style to any scrutinies not in a million year, hey hey!
i sent message
You have said exactly what I have said in the past: No strategy can win over the long run, but some are better than others. Looks good, did you post exactly how your strategy is played? If not, you at least posted your results. That's a lot more than an other guy on this thread is willing to do.
That makes him a chicken shat, right?
Oh yes I have played your exact same strategy, most likely even better. I know exactly what you do. You can't be that smart to have come up with a long term, winning flat betting strategy when no one else has been able to. There is no way to make any real money flat betting. Every bet you make no matter what strategy you use is only a guess. Whatever, and I repeat whatever results have happened in the past has nothing to do with what is going to happen next. Just like Nathan Detroit stated: Your strategy is a no brainer. Flat betting offers no real money to be made. And in the long run no matter what strategy you use it will turn to ruin. And especially so if you're flat betting a large dollar unit. A one unit win for a session, ha, ha, ha, ha. I could teach my youngest grandchildren to do that.
I think everyone is assuming SPIKE has a strategy.
He uses mystical techniques to read the tealeaves of randomness and win 1u every day "like candy from a baby" with zero drawdown.
I have already done the math taking his claims at face value. With his win rate and zero drawdown, only a fool would not have grown their bankroll and increased their unit size.
I even did the math using penny bets with a 5c bankroll again taking a more conservative estimate than his claims and even then he should own a Vegas casino.
Oh look here is the post:
No posting of proof is necessary, the logical consequences by taking claims on their face are sufficient to draw your own conclusions.
If his claims really are true what would you be doing to exploit such an edge to grow your bankroll?
The casinos in Australia and Asia take bets over $500k per hand, day in day out and can assist with establishing line of credit facilities, I am sure the casinos in the USA can accommodate high end players also.
But instead he's playing for peanuts on his home computer sharing the neighbours internet connection.
Separate names with a comma.