Roulette Do Roulette Tracker Tools Help with the Game? or are they a scam ??

Roulette tracker tools have gained significant popularity among players hoping to gain an edge in this iconic casino game. But do these tools really help with the game, or are they just another spin on wishful thinking? First, let’s clarify what roulette tracker tools are.

These tools are designed to log and analyze previous spins to identify patterns, streaks, or biases. Some even claim to predict the next likely outcomes. For players who enjoy systems-based betting—whether it’s chasing streaks or switching based on reversals—these tools can be a useful way to track trends without relying solely on memory.

However, it’s important to separate the real utility of these tools from the myths and scams that surround them. On the one hand, legitimate tools can help players maintain discipline, track their strategies, and even highlight interesting patterns for fun.

These tools won’t change the fact that roulette is fundamentally a game of chance, but they can make the experience more engaging. Real developers and enthusiasts—often roulette players themselves—create these tools to enhance gameplay rather than promise guaranteed wins.

On the other hand, the market is flooded with scams promising foolproof ways to beat the game. These shady services often charge exorbitant fees, claiming their algorithm or tracker will predict numbers with high accuracy.

It’s important to remember that no tool can overcome the house edge or predict genuinely random outcomes—even in European roulette, the odds are stacked in the casino’s favor.

In conclusion, roulette tracker tools can enhance your experience by helping you track and refine your betting strategy. Just don’t fall for unrealistic promises of guaranteed success. Remember: the wheel always spins in favor of the house, but that doesn’t mean you can’t have fun playing smartly and responsibly.

 

Agreed. Couldn't have said it better myself.

 

"It’s important to remember that no tool can overcome the house edge or predict genuinely random outcomes—even in European roulette, the odds are stacked in the casino’s favor."


Regardless of the house edge, tools plays an intricate role in making roulette profitable.
Is it possible to profit every session played?
Absolutely!, you only know what you only know.

So, if you hear from players who always lose, then that's all will you know.
On the other hand, when you come across a player who always profit, it's really hard to believe.
But, they quickly realize it's true.

How is that possible?, by becoming a Kimo Li professional.
This is where a tool can overcome the house edge.
How?, you cannot find it on any roulette forum.

Presently, I rarely post on forums. But this topic struck a nerve.
Why is anyone here boasting to be the best, all knowing?

I say to those individuals, give me a guarantee.
You can't?

Kimo Li

P.S. I can.

 

Hi R.Tool n Li
Agreed. If you have right charting tool and MM you can win more than you lose

Combine gizma (reading randomness) with kimo li sector betting and you have winning combination
I do have created an excel sheet based on sector beeting for 6 / 8/ 12/16 number out of 18 or 24 number with progression max time with 12 number

 

You can come up with your own "tracker" using math and imitating the motion of the wheel. The real "edge" comes when you understand how the wheel works. Dominant diamonds, balls sizes, fret styles, centrifugal force are just a few of the variables that you need to take into consideration.

 

How does these variables help the game without the use of a computer while playing live at the casino?
There is no guarantee using this approach. What it suggests is if a player is skilled in the understanding of these scientific approach it will make one a winning player. I do not succumb to this belief. Enumeration of physical descriptions of the wheel and the nature of physics does not guarantee winning. It provides players a fallacy that science prevails. It's a scam.

 

Only for GPM players. Best ever summary of how to beat roulette by Kimo Li:

"Choose a piece of Pie, shoot for the stars, all in"

 

Kimo... The brain is the best computer. No fallacy over here buddy. Just black chips. Some losing sessions and some very profitable sessions I've had.Let me ask you a question Kimo.. how many times do you need to watch something before you understand how it works? It took me 2 years of watching a roulette wheel to figure out how it works, variables & what type of wheels & dealers I have more of an advantage over. Don't be mad at me because I've figured it out... Go crazy and figure it out for yourself..

 

What if you wrote down cycle after cycle after cycle until into infinity......

No need for visual ballistics at all....the wheel produces certain patterns, outcomes each and every time we play...simply identify that and place your bets...

About Kimo Li his method I'm not sure what's going on because I never found solid info about it. But I'm guessing it will be probably something like what I'm doing. Just from another angle ( I might be wrong though)

 

Not entirely...some people do have what it takes. I've tried it in the past but it's hard and after a while your eyes get tired. Not to mention you need to lock out all those noises and nervous pushy people around you.

I'll stick to what I'm doing. I guess VB was much better 50 years ago

 

This philosophical mindset is obsolete.
For me, there is nothing to figure. Everything is complete.
I am happy for your success regarding your approach.

 

I don't know why you feel that a computer is required.
Furthermore, if you don't grasp some of the physics required in order to beat the wheel, then you're not going to win in the long term.

 

Perhaps a computer is not needed for some individuals.
It does not matter. Physics need not be understood in order to win in the long run.
The secret of winning in the game of roulette is to understand the nature of random.
What does that mean? It means it has nothing to do with science.

Can science guarantee 100% wins, every session? No, science relies on the long run.
My process guarantees 100% wins, each and every time, only a handful of players understand how random can be exploited.
This knowledge is achieved by members at level 4 studies, few make it to level 3, most are happy with level 1 and 2 (80% winning sessions).

Happy New Year

 

Hi kimo li
I have read your books and studied for almost 2 years and quite familiar with you star and pie and have created multiple spreadsheets to look out for pattern in randomness, we have some queries

1) is it better to play full pie or couple of number from each pie based on star
For eg if I want to play 12 number from nuke or hemi

2) what according to you is the best approach, is it static bet selection or dynamic bet selection for every spin

3) is it advisable to use progression?

 

Doesn't that make your thing also a science.

A repeatable & verifiable outcome.

Coz if it doesn't then you are in the wrong.

All science is standardized magic anyway.

Anything that was on the fringes of cognition solidified into concretely explainable, reproducible by certain means of causality→ effect.

So the main question is .. why do you attempt to distinguish your self/position away off science?

 

It's always a pleasure to respond to players who have read my books. I don't have to explain reference points.

1) With the basic information acquired by reading my material, it does not matter if you play full pie or a couple star numbers from each pie.
As the title of this thread suggest, bet selection is a tool. How to track these numbers is a entirely different story.

2) I do not know what you mean by static and dynamic bet selection.

3) Using progressions requires a large bankroll and the ability to determine the parameters of bet selection. No one ever wins flat betting in the long run because of the negative expectation built in the game. However, there is always a way to counter any outcome.

 

I am not trying to distinguish myself away off science. It is what it is.
My process is an "art form" that counters random outcomes, an innovative approach that defies scientific logic, which is also considered a tool.
One of my members described it as "unmatched."

 

Kimo,

Those of us that have real experience with advantage play can handily prove that your "art" is utterly worthless. All one needs to do is plot the change in yardage from the last number to have hit to the next number hit and then look to see if you're "pie patterns" are relevant. Having done such plots I can tell you that it's random. Furthermore broadening the wheel into fewer numbers in order to look for pie patterns is inefficient because it reduces the accuracy that's needed for real predictions. There's are countless other problems with your "art" as well.

 

Do not apply your advantage play with something you know nothing about.
Advantage play has it's place.

The "art form" I refer to has never been disclosed. So, how can you even make such a statement.
It has to do with how random outcomes defy logic.

Something you will never know, and others who are science like minded like you.
It drives science intellectuals crazy, to the point where they say things like, "utterly worthless."

I am not saying advantage play is worthless. It's not the way I would play roulette.

 

I find roulette easier with tools, I've been playing it for decades without and fully understand how it works, the tools just help me make it easier to win.