Roulette Dozen that never caught up

I try play roulette online live dealer.

The principle is to make profit a few unit.

Flat bet. But disaster. Maybe just unlucky or just dont have enough time to play cycle 7 or more. Dunno.

I play after 3 cycle. Just bet 2nd dozen over and over again. But after play 111 spin (cycle 4 to cycle 6) just disaster.

Minus 33 unit include zero four times in 111 spin



What do you think ?

Thanks

 

If you read here or the roulette forum, VLS or any of the many sites availabe
You would see posted that a dozen can miss for 34 spins. Been there and done that. So, why are you betting only 2nd dozen.
Is it some genius you have read?

 

Change it to always playing the leading dozen, keep playing until another dozen have more hits, then change to that dozen and keep going.
You have to play a progression to make money though doesn't win flat bet. Most of the time the trailing dozen doesn't catch up

 

That's why I say regression to the mean is BS

 

Play for finding the sleeping dozen or the continuing singles. These are two feature formations common in any dozens, including columns, or your own pet dozens. Bet the obvious two dozens that are woke, or that are the next two possible while there is a swarm of singles. If neither exist then don't bet.

 

That is a common complaint from the single dozen players.

One can drive a truck thru the gaps between the numbers on the dozen lay out .

 

By playing "follow the dozens " ( 2 dozens ) one rarely has a sleeping dozen ).

A
he leading dozen should get a small increase for the next spin .



Play at your own risk .

 

I know one dozen can miss for long.

I make bet 2nd dozen only because in my mind the principle of balance and that will caught up.

But for play just the cycle 4. Cannot make profit.

Continue play to the cycle 5 still cannot make profit. Continue to cyle 6 still cannot

 

Yes i will test it with leading dozen cross in my mind.

For the progression.. Hmm i want to make profit from flat bet.

I believe can do it because a few members can do it.

So far i still can make profit from flat bet. But still need improvement and still try are there alternative for the better result

 

If you are really good then you can bet twice as much on the 12 spots that you think will win, (dozen), and half that on the other dozen that is not sleeping. In this way, while the one you think won't hit still acts that way, you can get a 50 / 50 thing going on with a 66% chance of success. If the half price hits it's like nothing happened. If the sleeper wakes up then you lose both bets. If the 12 you selected to win hits then you make twice as much as the full bet placed on both spots.

This becomes an EC bet with a 66% chance of safety.

 

The 18 number "Dozen ": accordind to wheel base pick has a great killer edge .

 

Play the dominant dozen not just the same dozen every spin,thats just a dumb way to play.

 

Chris Mole


A very simple solution .

 

I messed around with the dozens for awhile and if you're betting two at once when you lose it's twice as much as you win so it's very easy to get in the hole. Betting one dozen at a time you're making twice as much as you lose but it's too haphazard, there is no way to make it work reliably. Gizmos idea of betting on one dozen and putting twice as much on another dozen can keep you alive for a lot longer because it's now an even-money bet. But in the long run it doesn't work either.

 

It's not BS but it's not what people think it is. Actual counts of results diverge away from the mean.

Over a significant period of time it is only the ratio (or average) of hits and misses that regresses to the mean.

 

Exactly!

This is why it can't be used to get and edge. It's why numbers are never due to catch up.

 

Did you read I wrote CLEARLY and UNAMBIGUOUSLY that I don't use regression to the mean?

SirAnyone,

Your guessing correlation is simply useless bs sophistication that gets into large drawdown that wins a few times on luck.

 

What is "guessing correlation?"

 

On the american wheel i have faired better playing columns before the dozens

 

You're the so-called expert at "guessing correlation". Why don't you explain your bs sophisticated method of guessing to us?