Blackjack Explanation needed

I have been playing a few local casinos over the last few months...playing 6 deck games. Two of them have a penetration of 1.2 to 1.5 deck cut odd and one, that used to be similar, now under different ownership, uses a notch and cuts of just about 35 cards. Deep penetration, standard H-17 rules.

The place where I have consistently lost is the game with the deepest penetration. Moreover, it seems they care the least. After having lost some 7 straight sessions, I just started blatantly playing 2 x $15 to start shoe, dropping to one hand of $15 at TC-1, going to 2 x $25 at TC2, 2 x $50 at TC+3 etc. No interest, no heat, the losing continues.

It just baffles me that I consistently lose. I am beginning to think the ASM is the issue. Rarely does the count go too far up or down. I know it’s not Ok on this forum to suggest ASM issues. I mean it’s the best penetration I have ever come across and I keep losing and moreover, no heat to speak off.

Source.

 

• “It just baffles me that I consistently lose.”

Axiomaticule, you do kinduv self-Freudism à rebours. You don’t repress your frustration — you vent it out. The gambling forums serve an opposite purpose: repress reality by getting drunk with illusions. The majority of posters in gambling forums are chronic afflicts who lost serious monies, especially with what they call AP (arithmetic psychosis).

The forum where you initially posted this pathetic case of gambling affliction (you too read me, Moitser?) — The asylum (BJTF) — is the most typical case of gambling affliction. It is a marsh of pathological liars, self-proclaimed APs (i.e. card-counters).

• “I know it’s not Ok on this forum to suggest ASM issues.”

You are referring again to The asylum (BJTF). Norman “Bates” Wattenberger is one of the biggest hypocrites you’ll ever find in this grandiose world of ours (you too read me Caligula Trump, tremendous loser of casinos?)

On one hand, N0rm opposes claims of casino cheating by employing ASMs and CSMs. He is the law-abiding businessman (sic!)

On the other hand, N0rm fabricates cyber-attacks against his forum. Nobody else encounters any attacks when accessing that place. Keep in mind, he has blacklisted all IP addresses he had collected about me.

Furthermore, he goes as far as accusing the casinos of attacks! So, simultaneously, casinos are honest entities by avoiding cheating by mechanical shufflers — yet them casinos resort to cybercrimes! Read “Site maintenance” in the “Announcements”. The hypocrite doesn’t say it directly (as he always does cowardly things). Yet it is clear N0rm accuses the casinos indirectly. As one poster put it: “It's probably the casinos.” Who else, pal?!

The good thing for you is fabricate you are gambling when, in fact, you live in safety of gambling forums. You know what happened to you in the cruel gambling reality!

Why “The Asylum” name? Well, one of their most notorious “patients” and a Norm’s closest buddy, Don Schlesinger, called it that way. And, for once, he IS write… er… right…
Read in the Gambling Forums:
“The Asylum: BlackjackTheForum (BJTF)”.

Read also in the Gambling Forums:
“Current feud with Qfit (Norman Wattenberger)”.

 

Viciousness and crookery deserve attention — always in the form of warning. Unsuspecting humans deserve to know and stay safe from such viruses.

“The Norman “Bates” Wattenbergers and Don “Raging Bull” Schlesingers of the world are krooks, and mooks, and bazooks. They strongly promote blackjack as a professional game, but they have never practiced it professionally. They lost big early in the game, and they ran away from casinos. Yet, they discovered the card-counting scheme in blackjack would greatly favor the casinos financially. Therefore they invested big-time in casino stocks… but they admitted it only after they were exposed. And they still sell books and cook-the-book software worshipping card-cunting!” 3:14

To that end, we must keep atop this elemental thread: “Current Feud with Qfit (Norman Wattenberger)”:
• https://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/current-feud-with-qfit-norman-wattenberger.6635/page-14#post-97428/