Roulette Figure it out

I don't have tools like these, so it's much harder for me to see things, but with tools I can see many things.
My email should appear in my forum profile, I have it posted openly.

 

My telegram on your profile mail is slow!

 

LoL F..in clown

I hope he doesn't scam you like the guy who later committed suicide. How predictable of him!I kept waiting for him to finally call someone private, lol. Although it was read betwen the lines,every time he returned here and wrote that this clown supposedly knew something. Just a bastard clown! What a joke, lol!

 

No worries Platton i am aware

 

Are you going to start this nonsense again?
I'm not selling anything, and I'm not going to do it anymore, people don't have a word and then I'm the one who looks bad.
Anyway...
If Atrox wants to talk, we'll talk, if not, I'll go my way and ignore this nonsense.

 

I'll just say one thing.
I think the solution is clear in the top 3 and the gaps in both columns.
I'm not going to go into this topic any further, whoever wants to work privately, I'm here, but I'm not going to participate in this thread any more with people who speak badly of me.
bye bye

 

I did post my telegram on your profile! I have nothing to lose.

 

Look at what Denzie posted at beginning of this thread. Is there any reason why it has to be across the entire board and not limited to a certain area? A dozen eggs is easier to eat. Numbers come, numbers go, the ones that go if they are strong horses will always make a comeback again and again. I use and advise a 5000 to 1 bankroll. I also use my custom progression spreadsheet that I adapted from my sports betting to give me 5% bankroll profit on each win so I double my bankroll every 20 wins.

 

2030 the puzzle will go on for ever. . .

 

Everything except an exact solid progression has been posted....now it's up to you

 

You and @Nimo do agree however on the following:

The use of a progression is only viable if there is a difference in data? Right?

Meaning 2 streams

one random

one algorithm

there Should be a Noticeable difference between the 2.

Correct?

 

Hi @Denzie , Could you tell us what that solid progression is like?

Thanks in advance!!!

 

I've shown people EXACTLY how I play. 5 different people, within a week 5 different methods. I have had them record themselves playing, they all ended up doing something that were not on my instructions to them. Even if you tell them step by step, they corrupt it. Others pick it up so easily. It's not the reading of what is out there, it's the comprehension.

Some will never see it. Others try to change it due to their own biases developed over the years, even if spoon fed it goes up their nose rather than in their mouth.

I may sound jaded about it, I am. I've tried to help a lot of people, most can't fathom the simplicity of what is posted in this thread alone.

 

@Denzie
See, they ask to be spoon fed.lol

 

Pueden hacer 1 pastel o 12 cupcakes...
O no ,quien sabe.

 

Hi @Nimo ,
I ask Denzie because he puts so much emphasis on progression. But progressions alone do not win. I assure you that I have studied many progressions and none by itself wins in the long term. Progression shortens the number of spins in our sessions but by itself it is not enough against variance unless you have unlimited capital and limits.
If we have some kind of advantage in our selection criteria, that is, we reduce the house edge, progression will make us win more and faster, otherwise there will always come a session that makes us lose what we won previously. And even if you put a stop-loss, I assure you that sooner or later you will return it with interest. That is why I am interested in seeing an advantage playing flat.

I'll give you an example of positive progression so you can understand. Positive progression increases the bet every time we have a hit (as Denzie explains in the first post of this thread). Denzi said that it increases +1 unit with each hit.
Well, this type of progression LOSES EFFECTIVENESS AS WE INCREASE THE PROGRESSION. Look below.

1 (unit)
2 we increase the bet by 100% with respect to the previous bet. So far so good.
3 We start to lose effectiveness, we only increase the bet by 50% with respect to the previous bet.
4 we continue to lose CORRECTION POWER since we increase the bet by 25% with respect to the previous bet.

And so, as we increase one unit our progression has less and less corrective power on our curve. As our progression increases we need more and more consecutive hits to be able to correct our deviation.

Having explained this, someone might say, then the Martingale is an ideal progression. And it certainly is, as long as we have some advantage in our selection criteria, that is, we reduce the house edge or the maximum distance between hits is substantially smaller than normal.

Kind regards!!

 

@Nimo, we exchanged messages a while ago, I tested and did a lot of tests, but when I sent you the ball-by-ball betting summary or the RX ".rmd" with some hellish session, I never received a response, neither good nor bad. I even coded many of the games without any success. I guess you don't have the time to review sessions from everyone and I understand that these answers are due to various circumstances. Other times, the simple language can be a barrier to understanding, etc.
However, as always, thanks so much for the help and comments.

I think we should treat each other with respect, there are people here who WORK HARD (including me) to achieve something positive. While it is true, there are always people who want the winning system on a silver platter and without any effort. They are opportunists. But not everyone is like that. There are many people who I know work and study roulette almost daily (Gary, Timothy, Spider, Platton, atrox23, KarlAtwo, Gigi666, etc...)

 

Hey Nimo if you show me what you did to those 5 I will get at the first try, but this thread is still thin air. Look there, is there, a proper progression, its up to you. Where is the simplicity on this thread! We are just hunting repeaters here supposed at a better hitrate but with huge drow . There is no point from you to say that we don't get it and you have helped others , we are trying to find it and you have it ( as you claim) so your post have to be helpful otherwise are pointless...

 

I don't see how playing repeats in a dozen will make much difference especially if you stick to one that will be cold. Plus gaps between hits can be much longer if I'm playing numbers all the time ie. using Denzie style example focus on 1st Dz
Na / 23, 1, 12, 33, 33, 16, 0, 36, 33, 5, 5 (we play 5)
5 / 23, 12, 1, 24, 0, 28, 29, 33, 16, 14, 21, 4, 21, 28, 22, 33, 1 (repeat on 1 while 33 keeps getting hotter)
1, 5 / 24, 16, 11, 10, 34, 33, 22, 21, 12, 13, 29, 30, 22, 11 (add 11)
1,5,11 / 25, 27, 5 (win -18u atm)

Now @Denzie said, combine his (I know here I'm playing just 1st Dz) style with Adv repeaters 1, so now I should probably drop all but the winner.

5 (at 2u)/ 33, 11, 22, 36, 27, 30, 25, 5
We're in profit, of course this way we won't get as many W vs A (adding numbers), so not sure it could win flat. Just another variations combining different hints.

@Nimo as I said many times before and you confirmed with your tale of 5 people you gave your method, it's safe to share as likely no one will follow to the letter especially that strong money mgm is required.

How about you or anyone else share 5 methods while only 1 being the one making you money, it'll be up to lurkers etc to test for themselves.

Have a good weekend everyone.