Baccarat G2M1

Does anyone see any value in playing a G2M1 as opposed to a G3M1? A +3, +1 and -3 may not be that savory. However getting 2WIAR seems easier than 3WIAR. Happy to hear your thoughts in this. And if you do bust out at -3 would it make sense to move up to a G2M1 starting with 2 then 4? That way you fully recover and then some on the next 2WIAR.

 

Actually in my testings with the Kotch style I found that the three win on a bounce were fairly regular but the butter and bread of the style is pickin of those one units win as you often get a win after the loss. But then I was bettin bankers only, hey hey.

 

Win 14 wagering from 17 bets with this!

 

From using the G2M1? That’s good.

 

Would you please share what G2M1 means as well as the others?

 

G2M1:

First bet is for 1 unit. If you win, you move to the second G bet which is 2 units. Win that, you start over up 3 units

If you win the first bet for 1 unit and then move to the second bet for 2 units, and lose that bet, you move to “M” or Martingale and bet 2 units again. If you win that, then you are up 1 unit. If you lose it, you are down 2 units.

If you lose the first bet, then move to M and bet 2 units. If you win, you are up 1 unit. If you lose, you are down 3 units.

G2 is a two-step positive portion of the progression and M1 is the Martingale or negative portion of the progression.

Similarly, a G3M1 is a longer progression. The G3 or positive portion is 1-2-4. The M1 like above is always that 2-unit “Martingale” bet at the end. You can search the forum for G3M1 for more information as well.

 

Thank you....

 

so its a progression-regression non dependent if one win or lose? or lose/win? because regardless of the out-come you are required to chip up and chip down if entering a losing sequence?

how many string of loses do you decide to revert back to one unit if the 2nd wager is lost?