Roulette Hiding behind

For long we have had the discussion around house edge, math, playing using the physical variable so on and so forth. Every time someone comes with a system, the math guys will simulate over a million spins and say that it is failing. Fair and square. But is it not one sided.

Where is the simulation and proof that VB is working. Where is the simulation and proof that bias based methods are working. Where is simulation and proof that computer based methods of working. Who is simulating them over a million spins to say that ultimately the house edge is catching them. Are they really hiding under the hood? Is it based on testimonials which can be clearly orchestrated to mask the truth. Is it based on few success stories, which might ultimately fail long term.


./index.php?topic=16884.0

http://www.rouletteforum .cc/index.php?topic=16884.0