1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette I found something about Roulette-Simulator that won't please TurboGenius

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by Bago, Apr 11, 2018.

  1. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I'm impressed.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 11, 2018
  2. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    2,080
    Gizmo.



    That 3 Winnings in a row and go scenario makes a lot of sense too. Makes sense with EC bet selections .( diminishing repeating probabilities as the game progresses )


    N.D.
     
  3. RouletteGhost

    RouletteGhost Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2015
    Likes:
    285
    Location:
    Long Island, New York
    turbo

    you have a fan club

    dont worry...your are more of a mature adult then they ever will be combined

    i never see you pushing your method on anyone...you've never even posted rules

    your success bothers them
     
  4. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    N.D. It's even better than that. I bet 24 to 26 numbers, depending on if the zeros are hot or cold. All I'm looking for is when single losses are in domination. My goal is to get three net wins. I don't need three in a row. I just need those three net wins to end a successful session. Now these singles in losses look like this: wwLwLwwwLwwLw, whereas doubles and larger look like this: wwLLwwwwLLwwLLLwwwwwLwLLww. Now this is where reading the effectiveness trend pays off. If losses are trending in singles then you can win the next bet after each loss. If you add to that winners are always in doubles or larger, like the dominate absence of singles in the flow of winners, then you can match up that trend to reach your net three winners also.

    Three wins with just $5 chips for each 24 numbers yields you $180. Do that a few times a day and you can put together a lot of money towards your retirement. Do it with $25 chips and you can make $900 with each winning session. It's just a matter of looking at what you are getting from your bet selection technique, with regards to the effectiveness. The only thing that really matters is the data coming from the win/Loss stream. This works without any regard for odds, expectations, progressions, money management, or law-of-thirds derivatives or expectations.

    It comes down to how good and patient you are at reading the random characteristics of the effectiveness states. The only true trend that is occurring is the win/Loss data. All other data is nothing more than a recognized construct based on hot hand type fallacies. Making a bet selection because something in the past suggests a trend just gives you a method to produce a bet selection from. Well that is just guessing. That is all that it should be used as anyway. So I have a nice way to put together bets based on past formations found in charts. They don't predict anything. They can look like they do but that would be very bad to think that they actually do.
     
  5. Bago

    Bago Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Likes:
    326
    Location:
    Mars
    Hello my friend, and thanks for taking the time to answer me. Unfortunately, your explanations are as bogus as Roulette-Simulator RNG. The proof is the graphs of the even chances distribution look perfectly normal around 25 in a raw. Check for yourself:
    https://roulette-simulator.info/en/roulette-analysis

    If the stats recorded a single number hitting 9 times in a raw because of clustered sessions, then it should be the same for the other locations, be logic.

    Bye random/maths super expert master TG. ;)
     
  6. Bago

    Bago Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Likes:
    326
    Location:
    Mars
    FYI, the equivalent (a single number hitting 9 times in a raw) in terms of probability for the even chances is a streak of 45,1 in a raw (excluding zero). So with zero included in would be worse than that. Again sadly for you (I am actually blubbering right now), the graphs do not show that for any of the even chances.
     
  7. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    I don't really see what's the point... 1/37 every spins as any other numbers... The only reason it becomes hard to see a 9x14 in a row is because you decided it to happen. But it would be as hard to see a 0/5/30/18/27/25/13/13/26 if i wanted it to happens.
     

  8. Bago

    Bago Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Likes:
    326
    Location:
    Mars
    Hello, the point is Turbo is using a repeater method on single numbers, and as I discovered that the same number hit 9 times in a row in the data history, then it is legitimate to question the fairness of Roulette Simulator RNG, that for me, is favouring the appearance of the same numbers in sessions, more than what randomness dictates.
    Your 9 combination numbers cannot inform us of anything concerning the reliability of the RNG.
    Thank you.
     
  9. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    hmmm, not sure... you could have found the block of datas that deviates from the mean. As you can find a number that is +4sd +5sd in this historic even if normally it shouldn't...

    By the way, why he doesn't import data from Wiesbaden? Coz we could think they cheat also? :)
     
  10. Bago

    Bago Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Likes:
    326
    Location:
    Mars
    You cannot compare +4-5 STD which is common on single numbers in the long run with a number hitting 9 times in a row on a 3,3 millions spins sequence.
    You can contact Wiesbaden if you want and ask them their max repeat number since they exist, it will never be close to 9. (I bet 5).
    Thanks.
     
  11. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    Yes i understood, but a record is made to be beaten... It's like you would say after 5 in a row that the number has less than 1/37... but as you know it is still 1/37.
    And it could happens right now, in your next 9 spins. I remember after my around 10000spins observed in casinos, i saw a 4times in a row... every people at the table said that it was rigged. Imagine that you first observation at your first visit you see that, what would you think?
     
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2018
    TurboGenius likes this.
  12. Bago

    Bago Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Likes:
    326
    Location:
    Mars
  13. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    No doubt that you come from Mars. "Continue to tell me that 9 in a row is possible on a fair RNG over 3 millions spins, you are a belgian clown." Sure mate, it could even happen on a 9 spin sample o_O Or maybe it cannot happen, but they have to take out the number off the wheel.
     
  14. Bago

    Bago Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Likes:
    326
    Location:
    Mars
    1 in 129 Trillions against a 3 millions spins sample. SURE
    proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fimg4.hostingpics.net%2Fpics%2F412658loser1.png
     

  15. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    You could have said 1/129trillons, against a 9 sample spins also to laugh more, but that's how it is...

    But i don't know, maybe on Mars people can say when and how randomness acts...

    Another thing that would probably piss you off, TG could have better results at the end of his carrier than you with your AP play... it's sad but it's like that... the beauty of the game.
     
  16. Bago

    Bago Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Likes:
    326
    Location:
    Mars
    Another fake registered 1 hour ago trying to defend the HolyGrailer, same pattern repeating on this messageboard. But at least you make us laugh and learnt me something, I didn't know Turbo was a carrier for a living. That explains why he spends his free time playing on free mode against fake RNG, it must be boring to drive a truck all day long.
     
  17. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    Not at all, i prefer AP play and i m not defending Turbo Genius, i don't know him at all. But that's how it is... At the end of his play (call it as you want) he could have better result than you even if he s not an AP.
    He just need to be on the right side of the curve with his -2.7% play while you re in the wrong side of the curve with your AP play.

    You seem frustrated about -2.7% play?? why?? you cannot make better?
     
  18. TurboGenius

    TurboGenius Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Likes:
    1,794
    Occupation:
    Self proclaimed Theoretical Philosopher
    Location:
    Near Atlantic City New Jersey
    It's a waste of time replying to him Sharp, he's a idiot.
    Like a child he'll pick on you for typing "carrier" instead of "career" but he'll say "raw"
    instead of "row" and not even notice it. He's mentally a child and worthy of the
    ignore button.
    I think I made the perfect meme for him this morning.
    Sometimes you have to drop to someone's level in order for them to understand
    simple things.
    287mon.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

  19. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    Nevermind about the mistakes TG, that's not my language.

    Yes i 've read him on other forum and saw how he was arrogant, ever with AP'ers actually.

    You could ask him why with his super AP play (that is in fact negative), he cares about what you play, instead of making millions at the table.
     
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2018
  20. Bago

    Bago Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Likes:
    326
    Location:
    Mars
    Not childish and mentally ill enough to create fake profiles to win an argument Turbo. I understand you are not happy I've proven RS uses a fake RNG, but instead of crying, start to play against a real wheel like Celtic Casino with a fresh account and 1000 units. You will never do it, you need a biased RNG and big spread for your progressions. You are a complete retard and maths sucker, even after 30 years of studying Roulette you do not understand why if you don't have an edge, you cannot win in the long run, that's quite sad for a so called Genius. Bye you and your fake profiles created with Socks5 (Ronafeet, Sharptracker and all the others).
     

Share This Page