Roulette I found something about Roulette-Simulator that won't please TurboGenius

TurboGenius, can you speak french? If not, how come i can say that Bago est vraiment un trouduc

 

An idiot this TurboGenius, can't understand basic maths, and can't write correctly simple words. Damn what a shit this dumb guy is. And english is his native language, contrary to me.

 

LOL
No I can't but I do use a translator when needed.
I even checked to make sure "raw" doesn't mean "row" in French, but no...
"in a row" turned out to be "dans une rangée" and not raw.
But he'll pick on you for your error of course.
By the way, anyone who sides with me is "me" in his eyes, and... "I need medication"...
go figure. What a strange person he is.
I've been in contact with the owner of Roulette Simulator - perhaps he'll choose to join
here and discuss the issue - but I warned him that it's going to be frustrating going
up against the likes of AP nonsense posters (and Bago).
Hell, Bago will just say we are the same person of course..
Unless of course he takes the side that the game cannot be beaten - then Bago will
say it's NOT me and that the person is correct.
It's a strange world, these forums. People can flip-flop their positions and "facts"
while always trying to appear to be the expert. Nice.

 

Comment se fait-il que je puisse dire que tu es un gros fils de pute? et bien parce que c'est la vérité.

 

Yes Bago will desesperatly try to explain to a million lottery winner that he shouldn't have played because Bago knows this is a -50%edge.

In fact this guy says he is an AP, and few years ago it was the same, when he was claming he won 2K with Petra and with a dealer signature on Dublinbet LOL, any true Ap knows that DS is BS, except Bago says so. So don't worry TG, this guy is probably trying to look for chips under the table to get an edge, he will get a bigger edge than applying his poor knowledge.

 

How come that you can say i am a son of a b*** you say? Coz it's the truth you say? No the reason is that you cannot say anything except that you re probably an AP playing less than -2.7%, so you're frustrated to work and to get worst result than classic -2.7% player

You should play euromillion mate.

 

You have a problem with maths and probabilities, to hit the Euromillion jackpot, the odds are: 1 in 139 838 160.
Why do you compare with odds of 1 in 129 961 739 795 077 (9 numbers in a row at Roulette Single Zero).

Where have I said I am a Roulette AP on this forum? Please quote me and stop lying like your alias TG. I have said I didn't play Roulette anymore. You are probably talking about Gambler's Glen 15 years ago, get your facts right idiot.

Yes I won 2K on Dublinbet and again you are wrong, it was against the dealer GOSIA, the ball used, the consistent spinning and the heavy tilt allowed me to win. Dealer Signature can work under the right conditions, which was the case that day, but as a biased wheel, the conditions are not easy to find, you really don't know what you are talking about silly belgian.
And yes you are a son of a bitch.

 

That's it, in a spin of 20 seconds the only mini mini difference in rotor speed will give you huge mistake... A little difference with the ball, for example a bit more or less friction and you got something different. You observed beauty of variance while you thought being an expert.

Why do you need to be so arrogant? If it can helps you, we can take time and try to find an answer in your early-childhood.


TurboGenius, Basically i m agree with the fact that the player cannot turn the table in a long term but as the casino has a small edge, lower the edge is, greater the fluctuations are... in other word you can take a lot also. Then it will depend also on the number of spins played, you could play all your life only 5000 spins while another played 100k spins.

 

It seems YOU are the one who get a problem with probabilities.

It is not because you have a "1 in 129 961 739 795 077" odd that you need to wait 129 961 739 795 077 spin to see it, it can happens just right now at this time. It is just a mean! From that statement, i don't see what is wrong with your sample on Roulette simulator, as it coudl happen theorically on the first 9 spins you see on the simulator.

 

There is more chance it happens right now than you having a positive IQ one day, I agree.

 

Well, when you post and when you want to proove that a simulator is rigged with this BS, we should care about your IQ not mine... Even if you came with a 100k/50k/30k spin sample...

Bago says to the crowd after 1 spin " Don't worry people! 129 961 739 795 076 remains now till a 9in a row number could come..."

Impossible event is a myth...

 

If there is no problem for you to see 9 repetition of a number right now, then you will accept this easily: Create an account on Roulette Simulator, spin the wheel, each time we have a 3 repetition of a number I pay you 100 euros, and when it does not occur you pay me only 5 euros. Put up or shut your dickhead mouth?.

 

Show the screenshot of the 3 first spins belgian moron.

 

The asshole disconnected and gone, a fucking big mouth but when it comes to put his garbage in application, he runs like a little crying pussy with his skirt over his head.

 

Mussels fisher, I don't have all day, so we play or not? It's not everyday I find a fish to make easy money, hurry up.

 

No i'm here but i make some other stuff...

What the hell is that? You came with your post full of BS, as someone who doesn't understand anything about proba... Yes people, according to Bago a 9 in a row has less chance than any other 9 serie... And you will need a trillon sample to observe it, if it comes quickly it's rigged... This is the BS you post, and now like an headless chicken you're running everywhere to find some other Defi...

Don't ask me to lose my time to do that, let's show us what it is about... another proof that it is rigged?

The only thing you did correctly is choosing your avatar... and why the hell you're so arrogant and insult people? As i told you, If it can helps you, we can take time and try to find an answer in your early-childhood.

 

As expected, you don't believe what you are saying, otherwise you would have accepted my super offer, instead you are talking about my avatar and childhood, when someone is cornered, it is normal to divert. Now that you proved I am right and you don't have the balls to back up your claims, I ignore you. Try your luck cooking fries to make some money, it works well in Belgium and does not require a brain, that's perfectly fits you. Bye loser.

 

Is this your way to escape the BS you wrote to proove the roulette simulator was rigged?

Comon, show us your other proof to show that it is rigged, we're impatient... Or go back tail between leggs where you're from you stupid frog

 

You're actually right and Bago is wrong - the site owner explained that there was a problem
with the statistical tool - it had NOTHING to do with a "rigged" RNG or the site being
fixed in some way to benefit the player.
But on a bright note - he did at least point it out so the problem could be fixed.
It's a shame that everything has to be "rigged" or "fixed" when the simple answer was just
a problem with the tool used to figure the stats. I guess it's easier to just claim it's
rigged - just like Steve and everyone else who believes winning is impossible.
It's been fixed and updated.

https://roulette-simulator.info/en/roulette-analysis

Which only of course brings me back to ......
How can naysayers and experts rely on "anything can happen" when it comes to trying to say systems don't work - then suddenly they see something and think "that can't happen" ?
Be it 30 hits in a row on dozen 1, or 60 reds in a row, or a number sleeping for 900 spins,
whatever you throw at them they always say "it's possible given enough spins"
But Sharp is correct - it can happen from spin #1 and doesn't take trillions of spins
in order to see it happen. People "DO" win the lottery with it's incredible odds, would
someone say it's impossible to them ? No. Same applies to this - 9 in a row could be
100 trillion to 1 odds of appearing but to them "it could happen" - then if it happens
"it's impossible".
They just don't understand at all.
But.... case closed, the stat is fixed and wasn't "rigged", sorry Bago.

 

Now that it's been resolved - you understand why you're a idiot and no one listens to you.
It wasn't favorable to me at all, and a perfectly fine working RNG.
What's your next "excuse" as to how I win and you can't ?
Don't bother replying, I have you on ignore as anyone sensible would do - until such
time you manage to get banned from the forum.