Roulette I've seen a new absurd claim that the gambler's fallacy isn't.....

Yeah look I don’t think we’re getting anywhere here, there is only 1 user > 1 million on there and they haven’t been active this year.
Again, I don’t mean any malice to anyone, I just wanted to see independent evidence to back up some of the things I read on here and there doesn’t appear be any so I’ll leave it at that.
All the best.

 

Every little while you must show pests & mongrels what's what & who's who.

Or, in Turbo's case, as I see it -- not letting the pests to germinate overboards meanwhile still offering & providing ropes & ways to the realm to those worthy or finding themselves worthy enough to get out of fig. mud filled with worms, where hens are trampling & eating them meanwhile biting at each other to the death as soon as spotting the blood .. never even looking at the sky except when taking a sip, dismissing even the possibility of flying .. where (usually) lone eagles are flying unconcerned & nonplused by it all.

.. meanwhile further exploring the mysteries of his passion ..

Could be wrong ..

 

Just take it to a casino and try it.

 

Who mobilized all those sock puppets ? A deja vue of 2019 ?

Just curious .

 

Of course. And on other simulators that use random and have higher limits, the sky is the limit.

2.5 Billion on roulette tables with higher limits.

Actually no, it would have to be revealed. But what if it's already been revealed but you never gave it the time
of day because..... you think it's impossible. Threads like this mean it's impossible, so says the experts.
So why even try to understand how it's done. I agree. Waste of your time. Just deny it's real.

What on earth do you think I do in the casino ? Do I just play random nonsense and hope it wins ? lol.
Strange. Oh wait - "Go make millions" Isn't that Steve's line ? Even then with "millions" it won't matter.
"Not enough spins", "got lucky", "you'll lose it all back".... Jeez that stuff gets old.
I keep forgetting I'm supposed to reveal every detail in a post and then post a copy of my W-2G and
a sworn affidavit from my accountant (notarized of course) and then.... NO !
It would be easy for everyone if people just paid attention and spent 1% of their time posting
how nothing works to actually think.
Who keeps talking about the Nobel prize ?? lol.
It's the Fields Medal for mathematics that would cover this and I'm too old. Besides, all the
"experts" are here already so that's not impressive.

Anyway - thanks for the laughs.
The haters are great. "Oh yeah ? Prove it !" But then accept nothing as proof.

They are the only ones who will argue that numbers should appear 1 in 37 attempts but also
.....that expecting a number to appear 1 in 37 attempts is a "fallacy".

You do understand how blatantly absurd and stupid that sounds ?

 

That's pretty funny too - have at it !
Steve always said beating simulators is "easy" because they are set up for you to win.
What a way to avoid being called out as wrong. It's so easy anyone can do it ? Strange.
Roulette Simulator has the stats for 47.9 million spins. Take a gander at the leaderboard... I'll wait.
How many people are - compared to + ? Let's see. 647 people are + (at least $1.00)
and 1,225 people are in the red. Grab a calculator would you. Strange how where everyone
wins there is exactly the right amount of winners to losers. Much be magic !
Or Parx where Steve says they give me 3k per day to play with..........damn.
840,691 days I must have stored up that 3k per day huh ? 2,300 years.........
Oh wait, maybe everyone wins there !!!! Must be why they sell credits to people for
an insane amount like 7 million credits for $1000.00 ? They must do that because so many
people win....... Oh wait ! I cheated and bought the 2.5 Billion in credits for $357,142.00
just to make myself look good... rofl.
You guys are great, never stop being ignorant.

 

Remember any account there can be set to "public" or "private".
Private accounts don't appear on the "Highscore List" but Public accounts do.
On the rare occasion someone gets into the top 10 by resetting
and resetting until they get a good run - then they never play again.
I'm not sure how that means anything, but that's that.
Or they have 1 game played... or they have charts that look like the worst thing
you could imagine but somehow ended up in profit.. then they stop playing.
Setting my account(s) to public would shut up the naysayers, but at the same time
all of my games would be public and reverse engineered - and that's not happening.

 

Turbo,

Playing in pretend mode isn't the same as winning for real. Remember, Bago handily beat your score, while showing how it was easy to manipulate the game board.

 

(Prove Turbo's system doesn't work, or is it?)


Graphs aren't proof of anything. Anyone can post a meaningless graph or data. Proof resides in supporting math and or proof of concept, neither of which has been produced.

 

Sir Anyone, mathboyz and naysayers are looking for free lunch.

 

It's the Nobel Prize that was given to John Nash; Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his Equilibrium, and the Fields Medal is only given out every four years to people under 40 in age. I guess you are SOL.

 

I read veteran members call you expert. What a stupid comment.

Ofc you look like expert to the ignorant veterans.

 

lol, yep and this topic ALWAYS (still) grabs my attention. Dont even get me started on The Monty Hall "issue".

Ken

 

Actually, I would .. in one short concise sentence .. is there anything to it?

 

The Monty Hall problem is very real. It's very much like the gambler's fallacy in that it's a bridge too far...many people will never be able to comprehend it. (I probably shouldn't post it, because Turbo will claim that the true solution also isn't real.)

And no, it won't help you beat the game of roulette.

https://statisticsbyjim.com/fun/monty-hall-problem/

 

Not by itself .. but is there anything to it?

Ken?

 

Yet if I walk up during the "game" when there are only 2 doors left to open - MY chances are 50/50.
I wasn't around for the choice when it was 3 doors.
I love when people make my own arguments for me and don't even know they are doing it.
I guess all brains don't work alike, huh. Let that one sink in Sir and tell me I'm wrong when you know I'm right again.

 

Turbo,

Straw man. There are initially three doors in the Monty Hall problem, not just two. Yep, this is a bridge too far for you.

 

To anyone who is willing to learn, Turbo has indeed revealed it years ago without the intention to do so. But you all need to do your homework and research it, well atleast i have, now it's your turn. Stop rambling about things wich aren't possible but research the things that are.
No, i'm not pointing anyone in the right direction to wich year and wich post he did it, you have to find it yourselfs, it's called study!
But for starters, it was years ago.
Have fun children.