1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette Marigny De Grilleau - Abstract Theory

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by Sputnik, Feb 5, 2019.

  1. Sputnik

    Sputnik Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Likes:
    362
    This is a theory based upon one abstract idea.
    One gambler won 30K using four-level progression, winning two in a row.
    He busts but still had 25K, continue to play and continue to win.

    Now I am not saying this approach would do the same for you.
    See it as my way explaining what Turbo explain about not all number will show during a 37 spin cycle, but for even money chance using the law of series concept, with some math and probability calculation.

    This can be played one side only.
    Stockmarket, Bitcoins, Forex, Roulette, Baccarat, Craps, Sic Bo

    Disclaimer:

    I don't take any responsibility for your action using the following information.


    I want to elaborate about a theory:

    a) Singles versus larger series
    b) Series of two versus larger series
    c) Series of three versus larger series
    d) Series of four versus larger series
    And so it continues …

    Marigny De Grilleau talk about overrepresented and underrepresented events, imbalance and correction.
    The deviation from the norm.

    The values are as follows

    Singles has the value of 1
    Series of two has the value of 0
    Series of three has the value of 1
    Series of four has the value of 2
    Series of five has the value of 3
    And so it continues

    Same for a, b, c, d …

    Series of two has the value of 1
    Series of three has the value of 0
    Series of four has the value of 1
    Series of five has the value of 2
    Series of six has the value of 3
    And so it continues

    Now, look at this theory that has not been tested.
    Assume we would live in a perfect world and get a perfect sequence.
    Where the deviation of the norm increase step by step with no present regression/correction for each level.

    For example, if I play against singles my expectation is to get a series of three.
    Assume I use a benchmark or a certain value for each level where the overrepresented events have to reach for example 2.07 Z-Score.

    I have a 36 step progression winning two in a row.
    That cover six stages.

    That would be six singles with no series of three, first level reaching 2.07 Z-Score
    Second, if we lose, would be to wait for a series of two to aim for a series of four, if we lose again we reach 2.07 Z-Score
    The third time, if we lose, we wait for a series of three to become a series of five.
    The fourth time, if we lose, we wait for a series of four to become series of six.
    The fifth time, if we lose, we wait for a series of five to become series of seven.
    Time six, if we lose, we wait for a series of six to become series of eight.

    Do you see the magic of the deviation of the norm only need to regress with two events in any given situation?
    This means that you would have a 300 trail sample where the singles and series hit in perfect order.
    With other words a 300 sample with no variance.

    Code:
    1. Z-Score 0,02 -  1 singles contra 1 serie of three
    2. Z-Score 0,73 -  2 singles contra 1 serie of three
    3. Z-Score 1,18 -  3 singles contra 1 serie of three
    4. Z-Score 1,53 -  4 singles contra 1 serie of three
    5. Z-Score 1,82 -  5 singles contra 1 serie of three
    6. Z-Score 2,07 -  6 singles contra 1 serie of three
    7. Z-Score 2,30 -  7 singles contra 1 serie of three
    8. Z-Score 2,51 -  8 singles contra 1 serie of three
    9. Z-Score 2.58    9 singles contra 1 serie of three
    10. Z-Score 2,70 - 10 singles contra 1 serie of three
    11. Z-Score 2,89 - 11 singles contra 1 serie of three
    12. Z-Score 3,06 - 12 singles contra 1 serie of three
    13. Z-Score 3,22 - 13 singles contra 1 serie of three
    14. Z-Score 3,37 - 14 singles contra 1 serie of three
    15. Z-Score 3,52 - 15 singles contra 1 serie of three
    16. Z-Score 3,66 - 16 singles contra 1 serie of three
    17. Z-Score 3,80 - 17 singles contra 1 serie of three
    18. Z-Score 3,93 - 18 singles contra 1 serie of three
    19. Z-Score 4,06 - 19 singles contra 1 serie of three
    20. Z-Score 4,18 - 20 singles contra 1 serie of three
    21. Z-Score 4,30 - 21 singles contra 1 serie of three
    22. Z-Score 4,42 - 22 singles contra 1 serie of three
    23. Z-Score 4,53 - 23 singles contra 1 serie of three
    24. Z-Score 4,64 - 24 singles contra 1 serie of three
    25. Z-Score 4,75 - 25 singles contra 1 serie of three
    26. Z-Score 4,86 - 26 singles contra 1 serie of three
    27. Z-Score 4,96 - 27 singles contra 1 serie of three
    28. Z-Score 5,07 - 28 singles contra 1 serie of three
    29. Z-Score 5,17 - 29 singles contra 1 serie of three
    30. Z-Score 5,26 - 30 singles contra 1 serie of three
    31. Z-Score 5,36 - 31 singles contra 1 serie of three
    32. Z-Score 5,45 - 32 singles contra 1 serie of three
    33. Z-Score 5,55 - 33 singles contra 1 serie of three
    34. Z-Score 5,64 - 34 singles contra 1 serie of three
    35. Z-Score 5,73 - 35 singles contra 1 serie of three
    36. Z-Score 5,82 - 36 singles contra 1 serie of three
    37. Z-Score 5,90 - 37 singles contra 1 serie of three
    38. Z-Score 5,99 - 38 singles contra 1 serie of three
    39. Z-Score 6,07 - 39 singles contra 1 serie of three
    
    Made a short 300 sample from today's random org file.
    30 hits on level one and 2 hits on the second level.

    a) 30
    b) 2
    c)
    d)
    e)
    f)

    Code:
    2
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    1 W
    1 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    1 L
    1 W
    1 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    2 W
    1 L
    1 W
    1 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    2 L
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    2
    1
    2 L
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    1 L
    1
    1 W
    1 W 2 LEVEL
    2
    2 W
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    2 L
    1 L
    1 W
    1 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    1
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    2
    1
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    1 W
    1 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    2
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    2
    2
    2
    2
    2
    2
    1
    1 W
    1 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    1
    2 L
    1 L
    2 L
    1 L
    2 L
    1 L
    1
    1 W
    1 W 2 LEVEL
    1
    1
    1
    1
    1
    2
    2 W
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    1 L
    2 L
    1 L
    1 W
    1 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    2 W
    1 L
    1 W
    1 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    1 L
    2 L
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    2 L
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    1 W
    1 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    1 L
    2 L
    1 L
    2 L
    1 L
    1 W
    1 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    1
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    1 W
    1 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    2
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    1 W
    2 L
    2 W
    2 W 1 LEVEL
    1
    1 W
    1 W 1 LEVEL
    2
    1 L
    1 W
    2 L
    1 L
    2 L
    1 L
    2 L
    2 W
    1 L
    2 L
    2
    2
    1
    1
    
    
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2019
  2. Sputnik

    Sputnik Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2014
    Likes:
    362
    Well, I run some RX simulations and is not working as I assume.
    But it was a fun idea.

    As Laurance once sad - Playing the game change the game ...

    Cheers
     
  3. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    290
    Location:
    Belgium
    That's very good Sputnik to precise it.

    There are many people in my forum's country calling Marigny 's work a Holygrail also.

    I am certain that it doesn't beat the game, actually one day hopefully we will realize that someone with any system he could imagine could kill the bank once in his life... and i repeat really with any system. We're then coming back to what Jerome said, everything is equal.

    As my friend said, the only thing you got to do when you don't have the edge is to fall on the right pattern that suits what you're doing!!!
     

Share This Page