Roulette More on that so called Fallacy.

sure man, will look into it when i get home from work.

 

to bad he's dead. i know he would have loved rx and all the info we got from it, they didn't had the insight back in those days.
But somehow, i guess he would liked turbo's posts. and he would have given a big thumbs up to my posts as well

 

Check further what Albert E. said about ing at the roulette table .



ND

 

Einstein only spoke once, and one sentence at that, about Roulette. And it was nothing dramatic like "ALL SYSTEMS DON'T WORK, SORRY BOYS" or anything of the sort.

Over time players have ascribed entire thoughts and theory application as coming from Einstein commenting on Roulette, but in reality he made one flippant remark more as a casual observation than an sort of analysis of the game.

You're better off sticking to the correct observation about # of pockets/incorrect payout as being the absolute barriers for any non-VB betting application being successful over time in Roulette.

 

I tried ur strategy.. and I show you the repeats of the last street. So a Street should go to 1 of 13..


35 26 11 11 23, 14 ,20, 23, 57, 37 , 23 , 28, 1, 5 , 3, 8 , 17, 11 , 18, 21, 10, 16

I could not turn this into plus, I played with a positive progression of +1

 

As if Einstein needed a software to calculate the intervals between numbers/locations. What an insult to a genius who had the double of your IQ Elvis.

 

I anticipate the response of Turbo or Elvis: You need to use a more aggressive progression at least: 1-2-4-8-16-32. You will probably make your session a winner but when you will face a hard session where your location is staying cold, you will lose your house instead of your pants with a +1 progression.

 

Ok here are more clever peoples in mathematics and physic than Einstein
But they all hide all their knowledge from others

 

Some smart cats have stayed away from this topic and more will follow .



ND

 

Nathan,

The poster Benas is an amazingly brilliant player that just happens to be on this thread. He too is at the top when it comes to skill and knowledge.

He has the skill to play flat wheels that would wipe out most seasoned veterans.

 

Some crazy numbers in that stretch BW, with doz 1 well and truly over represented. Works out to a dream session for me.

 

Shows that in roulette, what is one mans gruel is another man's gold

 

I never used to post on GG. My first forade was on VLS - remember that one ?

 

So.......... what was the "1, 5, 3, 8" ? Do the "I only argue crew" want a shot at it ?
At this point (before the 1) the street was at -2.71 std deviation. 12 shows when the average
was 24.97
Another post in another thread about something else demonstrated what I'm saying.
'eh nevermind. lol. I've explained it every possible way and upside down to no avail.
We'll just assume that the Fallacy doesn't exist and this street is returning towards
ooooooops (DRIFTING) back towards it's expected hit rate.
Random has limits.

 

He never once said anything about roulette - it's already been shown that this never happened.
It's called a Urban Legend, and fortunately they continue on and on because when someone hears
that someone said something (even when they didn't) - they keep the ball rolling instead of
pointing it out. I looked it up - he has no actual documented opinions concerning roulette.
There's reality - and then there's the Fake News. Don't be stuck in the latter.

 

i read many other topics here last nite for the 1st time.
and you guys really do seem to have hatred and anger inside of you all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

lots of it in fact.

so sad, real sad and i am sorry for some of U guys!!!!!!!!!!!!!

look in the mirror and give yourself a kiss cuz i can imagine anyone else giving U one, serious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

argue about progressions, board forum names, other forums, wagers, and betting ideas, fuck me serious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Yes you are right turbo, I never doubt on your message, but when I have started after the point where this street shows up once, I couldn't do it with progression till this "1,5,3,8", so the question is maybe the beginning with 35 was too low and u wait for another starting point?

 

TG ,

Your explanation makes sense to me .

ND

 

I'm sure that Charles Ponzi could still scam a lot of people in here...

 

Buffalowizard,


Welcome . Nice to see you again since the days at VLS.



ND