Roulette Nathan Detroit`s 2 dozen roulette System

Nathan Detroit`s 2 Dozen Roulette System



Section A ******* Section B******** Section C
1 13 36 24 3 15 - 34 22 5 17 32 20 - 7 11 30 26 9 28 0
2 14 35 23 4 16 - 33 21 6 18 31 19 - 8 12 29 25 10 27 00



Section-A----number 1 - 16

Section-B----number 34 - 19

Section -C----number 7- 27

After establishing where a section has been hit place your bet accordingly:

On layout.

Hits section A ,bet First and second dozen on layout.

Hits section B, bet Second and third dozen on layout

Hits section C , bet First and Third dozen OR

Optional choice dbl . street 7 -12 , 25- 30 , and second dozen .

For recreational purposes only. Play at your own risk.

ND

 

i have played this, more wins than losses so far

 

Well done .


ND

 

I forget your progression,, I use a simple 1-2-6 and stop there .. surprising how easily you can get 5-10 units most times

 

Ran this through 60 numbers on Zuma. Worth more time testing for long runs of losers. As we all know, that is the killer.

Thanks ND

Sam

 

Another roulette "system" that offers no validity?

 

"Most times" being the operative words?

 

Sam,

This being a method based on neighbors it should be played at a live dealer attented 0/00 wheel in a B & M casino.
For nme as a short term player it is he perfect bet selection.


Easily attainable win goal at 10% of bankroll and 25 % Loss Limit.No progressions, never recycle net winnings.

Objective winning 2 out of 3 sessions.



ND

 

Yup Zengrifter most times-----Is card counting or other pos EV bets winners all of the time? If it is I truly congratulate you!!!

 

I know that you know the answer to that question.
What it comes down to is that it IS entirely possible and even likely that many different betting systems will show a gain over many trials, but ultimately the house edge WILL prevail. Conversely, card-counting (done right) or ANY +EV gambling can and often will show losses in the short-run, but ultimately WILL prevail over the house.

 

you heard the man Nate Detroit above, play this bet flat! win small sessions. I think he has been doing this one for more than twenty years. But I do agree your way or my way wont win all of the time--staying ahead is the idea. You mentioned that you play roulette somewhere. How do you play if you care to share!

 

According to all conventional math and statistical logic, it is unlikey that a gambler can "stay ahead" playing that way.
As for me, I stated that I would not play roulette seriously, for large or small stakes, without a hidden computer or other advantage.

 

Ok so your not a serious roulette player. Computers are illegal in most casinos.....So keep on posting your key word , its UNLIKELY to stay ahead if that gives you joy.....

 

Yes, statistically-speaking NONE of the betting schemes touted at this forum will come out ahead.

 

what about card counting for blackjack thats on the forum-----and who is touting anything I thought it was more of a discussion

 

I stand corrected. "Touting" was my in-artful choice of words.
Virtually ALL betting-scheme systems DISCUSSED here have no basis in statistical logic or probability theory.

 

ok -- you may be right ---keep on telling peeps that. zzz I do think most people here understand that pos ev is the best way to go but if you enjoy repeating it over and over thats fine by me

 

Don't know how this will fly as it's my first time. This is the first 270 spins from the Zuma 00 tester.

EDIT: I was able to view it.

Comments?

Nathan?

TwoCat

 

Lucky.

 

just a little higher than a double doz should be thats good