Casino Online casino dilemma

I am going to post this at several forums, in the hopes that someone may have some ideas. Unfortunately, I am not a member in good standing at WoV, where I know there are some members that play online.

So a couple weeks ago, I signed up at an online casino that offered a decent bonus. After playing through the required rollover, my $200 investment is now $4300. Not a bad return if I can actually get the money. I have since read that this online casino doesn't have a great reputation when it comes to paying out.

So I have another online casino that I use to place sports wagers, that I have used for years and have gotten payouts from numerous times with no issues.

So I am trying to figure a way to get the bulk of the money from one account to the other, that I have more confidence in. I was thinking something along the lines of betting opposite sides of games, the side I really like on the more reputable casino and the other side at the less reputable casino that currently has the $4300. That way I could only lose juice and depending on exact lines, plus the 5% Friday night vig that I use for all my weekend games. BUT, for this to work, I would have to pick more winner, and I don't have a great track record of that. I might just as well end up with more money in the wrong account.

Does anyone else have any ideas? I feel like there is something I am not thinking of? Something I am missing or not considering.

 

Your first mistake was playing anything but sports betting at a dumb, foreign online casino that's very likely unregulated. Why anyone gets sucked in by these silly bonus offers is a true mystery....other than them being total asshats. Your being in a location like LV makes you even more of a moron.

But alas....you've already weakly succumbed to your gambling addiction (undoubtedly, something that would instantly be sanctioned by the likes of Dan "online addicted" Druff) and now claim to have a $4300 balance--but you for some reason are shaking in your fairy boots about what may or may not happen if you attempt to make a withdrawal.

Here's your solution kew, and it won't cost you a penny. HIT THE CASH OUT BUTTON, THEN WAIT, AND IF YOU AREN'T PAID WITHIN A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME AND AFTER YOU'VE EXHAUSTED ALL POSSIBLE EFFORTS, THAT IS YOUR QUEUE TO BRING THIS UP ON THE FORUMS. Not prior to any issues at all. WTF junior?

However, I do understand your lack of self-confidence leading to your insecurity over this. $4300--whether made up or not--is a lot of money to ANY LV slug claiming to be an AP....which more Las Vegans do than don't.

Now for the advice: even a dummy knows you don't chase online bonuses before thoroughly checking on their reputation. I again say with 100% confidence: you are NOT a successful/winning blackjack "AP". If you were, your tells would not be so simple to decipher, and your discipline and planning would be closer to off-the-charts than in the dumps.

 

I posted a rational response to this at VCT.

Dan Druff, meanwhile, is 17-1-2 ATS in the NFL this season with an Under 42 tonight. Unfortunately, I need Denver to win the game. I don't need them to cover, just win outright. Normally, I like seeing rookie tackles be abused, but this game is so ugly, I'm not even enjoying it.

 

There you go again. Knowing Denver is probably gonna win this pathetic game, you claim you have them on the money line with the score 6-6. Gee that's brave.

Dan's record is irrelevant, unless he AND I both prove you wrong by going 68% or higher. From all indications, he's an online gambling addict who is having his best results right now amongst years of losses and bad poker beats. But I'm rooting for him nonetheless.

 

The score was 6-3 when I posted, and somewhat more importantly, I'm in contests where I had to pick a winner. Usually those contests require you to do so before the game kicks off. And anybody with accounts on those sites can see who I've taken.

Good try, Robocchio.

And Dan isn't doing what you claim to have done. Two entirely different things.

 

You have been forever using this weak excuse for past-posting your picks, rather than posting them before the games start, just like the various forum "amateurs" have had no problem doing...forever.

No members on any of these forums have ever corroborated your claims. Why is that?

Nobody on the forums has ever admitted to having accounts on these sites that you write about.

Who and where are these people who can see who you've taken?

 

LOL. Go ahead and sign up, coach. You can follow along. I'll give a contest update on Monday. Currently tied for second at TopBet.eu, but if the Colts win, I'll drop, maybe as far as tenth. About 1300 in that contest.

And I have to add, if ever a game deserved overtime, it's this one. Now I can go blind in both eyes.

I put lunch money on the Bronco tight end to score the first TD at 28-1. Who knew there'd be no TDs?

 

Again, supposed contests where you make picks but never post them in advance. And even more pathetic is "anybody with an account can see your picks". How many of us have accounts at unknown entities? NOBODY delivers more cowardly excuses than you do on forums.

I don't follow "Dan". I'm simply going by what you're claiming about him--that he has an extraordinary NFL record ATS this season so far. At least that's what you've alluded to.

 

Here's a question you don't want: why, if you claim all these fantastic records in past tournaments, do you not post any of your picks BEFORE the games are played? Isn't that the very simplest way of not continuing to look as stupid as you do?

 

Have asked him for last 2 years same question. He only condemn other people, grift free casinoverse wifi, drinks and food meanwhile dissing everyone that have provided the free aircon ( air conditioning) and casinoverse freebies. He will only post after the fact. Big numbers say you sign up as many FREE competitions as you can , hell in Tennessean hillbillylarios raccoon rutting backwater you got sweet fukall to do apart from raccoon humping dig up a corpse to necro , so with the free casinoverse wifi you sign up . At least one of the 170000 websites your bound to get top 10 SOMEWHERE. Shut even I can do the combination to work that out.
Picking Denver to win , rank fucking amateur. Apparently EVERYONE else know fuctard all about USA sports betting, hell even I went under 59 points game total. I’m on Green Bay game over 27 points total. Houston game under 60 points.

Credit to you and other that POST SELECT BEFORE TiME.
Diet Coke no ice hillbillyliarous, go retire, you got nothing, never did have anything, your pick web site a joke , yeah can see why you retire, go to hobo las loser Vegasvill , get on the free tito gig, or do blowjobs for that warm winter meal in your stomach. Lol.

 

Hard lesson learned. Hopefully you get at least your initial investment out and if you don’t get anything beyond that count your blessings, if you get anything more take it and leave it as an expensive lesson. Due diligence always , everything else is not excusable and is just degen gambling at the least. Cheers

 

Degen gambling. Shot in the dark hillbillyliarious

 

Here's a question. If you don't believe me, why don't you rustle up $20 and open accounts on the posted sites and follow along?

Then, when it turns out I'm lying, you can report it. Easy peasie. Or does logic not enter the equation?

You could even post screen shots of the standings and all that.

 

Your same M.O. You go on forums claiming to be some big deal winning sports betting handicapper or whatever, but you NEVER post any of your so-called evidence or support of any kind.... instead always telling others they need to know secret passwords or pay to open accounts in order to see how great your picks have been.

This is simply an extension of your excuse-ridden refusal to post back-up to your claims that "couldn't be found on the internet" because of BS "copyright issues" that you claim to have sent to Alan so HE could post them.

And you say you have a "pristine reputation"?

Because you don't want to appear bad, you don't post picks prior to games being played, yet always claim to have had winners afterwards. Then you claim to have won all these obscure contests, yet you never post screen shots of any of them. And when you get taken to task over these inactions, you serve up a litany of complaints, lies, excuses, obfuscations, and at times, anger.

You are the perfect life-partner for kew.

 

Yeah, except for the fact I was monitored by "Tipsters or Gypsters?" for a decade and appeared on the Buffalo Satellite Handicap show and in Handicappers' Report Card and in The Sports Monitor and in The Wise Guys for 30 years and on a nationally distributed newsletter called PlayBook, available on every newsstand for a decade, hell, my plays have never been in public.

So you're spot on.

 

And blah blah blah......

Have you ever posted screenshots of any of these strange items? And why the failure to post any of these "winning picks" BEFORE the games are played? Are you too dense to understand what that would do for your so-called reputation in front of the 20 or so forum posters you crave respect from?

You make this so easy to put to rest.

 

All of these plays were public before the games were played. What about being monitored don't you understand? What about being in a national newsletter published before games are played do you not understand? That's the thing about football newsletters -- people tend to buy them before the games are played. That's a little business acumen you may have missed.

Good luck, Mr. 68% ATS. Tell Santa I said hey.

 

"All these plays (picks?)" blah blah blah. If self-promotion and self-perception are so dang important to you on these forums, what's your problem with posting pre-game screen shots instead of just proclaiming "hey everybody I did this and that for the last 30 years that'll impress the hell out of you"?

Your approach to enshrinement is simply to claim this and that, then tell people they need a secret password, a paid account, or to buy some flyer that's used to wrap fish.

You reek of for-profit pick-selling.

 

Even more confusing than redietz is the poster who calls himself Seedvalue across various forums. He's been talking a very big game lately, divulging all kinds of kew-like personal details that mean nothing to anyone but him. However, most seem to believe his tales. I thought I'd give him time. Time usually untwists the truth.

He spun a story about being worth some high 7-figures number on WoV along with a challenge of proof that included Alan having to recant his witnessing 18 yo's, and I believe it was coach who called him on it on VCT as well as him being willing to take back the 18 yo's for Alan.

Well, as one might expect about some prolific poster claiming to be worth that much to a bunch of nobodys, Seedvalue is trying to plant the fact that the WoV Seedvalue is not the same as the one elsewhere.

That's one way to wiggle out of the bold statement. But this also might be a blessing for kew. He lies across all forums, he knows everyone knows he does it, and he uses the same dumb handle in doing so!

 

Well, then, I guess you could try to buy something from me and see what happens. Go ahead. Have a friend, relative, or alias try to buy something. LOL. Give it a shot. Then be honest enough to report back here. Anybody reading this, I encourage you to track me down -- email, phone, PM, whatever. Attempt to buy something. Do it today, do it next week, do it next season. Then report back what you find.

Almost everything Singer claims has some easy way to check whether it's true or false. But he never checks. He never encourages other people to check. He provides no details. He provides nobody who can corroborate anything he says or writes.

Good luck, Mr. 68% ATS. If you win six in a row, you'll almost be on schedule.

It's a shame about that parlay this week. You should probably play some more parlays today. Don't be shy. You're due. You're only down four units on parlays.

That Bears game last week. What a shame. If you had taken my advice and took the other side, it's a swing of, what, 21 units on the parlay and three units on the game. That was a damned shame. You'd be cruising. Oh well.