1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Join our $5,000 Cash Giveaway!

    Win Cash by Posting and Inviting New Members!
  3. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play sub-forum.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette Playing "Repeaters" in a controled way

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by jekhb1976, Feb 6, 2019.

  1. jekhb1976

    jekhb1976 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2019
    Likes:
    123
    Location:
    Holland
    Every one is facinated when it comes to repeaters.
    The only problem that keeps returning, is wich repeaters to bet? do we bet the 2s becoming 3s? or 3s becoming 4s etc.
    and ofcourse, how we controle the max numbers we bet on.
    When i first started with roulette, about 25 years ago, i knew nothing about how random worked or what not to bet and what the best methods were to make sure that my bankroll didn't go up in smoke within the hour.
    After losing alot of money in a few years time, i found out the hard way that martingale lol won't bring in the money.
    i was just learning about progressions and that betting on too many numbers would also be a one way trip to the poorhouse.
    Progressions are great but only when you know you will have and edge in the game you are playing, only then it will be safe to use one.
    After a while i would only play repeaters because i knew i had an edge doing so, man i was so wrong. i didn't realised that by playing repeaters you can also get caught by playing to much numbers, so i thought of making my own rules, while playing my favorite type of betting.
    What i did was rhe following;
    everytime a number would repeat, i would look if the repeat came within a spin cap of 9 spins. if so, then i would play this repeat up to 36 spins, no hit then i would raise that number 1 time only with 1 unit and i would play that number for one more cycle up to 74 spins. no hit, release that number.
    i did this also when a repeat did hit again in 36 spins.
    so, i made a game within a game. this would keep my max numbers bet to a low amount.
    i would never play long progressions and after tested this for 1000s of spins i knew that the hitrate on these repeats were somehow higher than on repeats with a larger spin cap between them.
    new high, start over. no new high after a hit, keep goin until a new high is reached. this on a rolling basis with a substained amount of numbers in play with a high hitrate method.
    can it still work? could be.
     
    Mako likes this.
  2. Mako

    Mako Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2018
    Likes:
    146
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    Good post eddy, reminded me of some RNG large spin data that CelesCliff posted.

    From 10 million spins, single 0 wheel simulated:

    In 37 spins to expect a third hit:
    Number of spins: 9999990
    Number of cycles of 37 spins: 270270
    Cycles with three hits: 265475 / 270270
    Percentage: 98%

    In 37 spins to expect a fourth hit:
    Number of spins: 9999990
    Number of cycles of 37 spins: 270270
    Cycles with four hits: 134963 / 270270
    Percentage: 49%

    In 74 spins to expect a fourth hit:
    Number of spins: 9999990
    Number of cycles of 74 spins: 135135
    Cycles with four hits: 135122 / 135135
    Percentage: 99%

    In 74 spins to expect a fifth hit:
    Number of spins: 9999990
    Number of cycles of 74 spins: 135135
    Cycles with five hits: 122565 / 135135
    Percentage: 90%

    In 111 spins to expect a fifth hit:
    Number of spins: 9999990
    Number of cycles of 111 spins: 90090
    Cycles with five hits: 90090 / 90090
    Percentage: 100%

    In 111 spins to expect a sixth hit:
    Number of spins: 9999990
    Number of cycles of 111 spins: 90090
    Cycles with six hits: 90090 / 90090
    Percentage: 100%
     
  3. Tesla

    Tesla New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2019
    Likes:
    3
    Location:
    UK
    This to me explains Turbo's horse racing analogy perfectly. For example:
    • The finish line is a number hitting 6 times
    • We know the time frame in which it will happen (MAX 111 spins)
    • As we move closer to that point, we can be more and more confident that it's going to happen soon (positive progression)
    • Bet selection = numbers which have already hit 5 times (they are near the finish line)
    Essentially, taking a known future event (in a known time frame) and narrowing down the bet selection to only the numbers that can fulfill that event.
     
    Mako likes this.
  4. Mako

    Mako Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2018
    Likes:
    146
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    Agree Tesla, if you’re going to pursue Turbo’s philosophy you have to combine multiple elements from the various different approaches he’s detailed singularly to be able to hopefully predict what’s due, or not, and adapt to it.

    Playing just one of his approaches in a mechanical way without drawing on the others isn’t going to produce consistently.

    That’s one reason why so few have been able to put it all together, because you’d need to apply it all simultaneously as you play.
     
  5. jbs

    jbs Active Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    Likes:
    28
    NOTHING is ever due!! Get it through your thick head.

    The fact your avatar is a shyster cartoon lawyer says a lot about you. Another scammer roulette ploppy!
     
    Richie likes this.
  6. Mako

    Mako Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2018
    Likes:
    146
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    And that really is the challenge, because you have to use a MM and progression that can withstand outlier circumstances.

    Fun challenge though. :D
     
  7. Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone

    Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone Well-Known Member Lineage to Founders

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2015
    Likes:
    413
    Occupation:
    Shoe Cobbler
    Location:
    Merica
    Two systems that lose in the long run can't be combined to form a winning system.

    Also, money management can't turn a losing system into
    a winning one in the long term.
     
    Richie likes this.

  8. Ka2

    Ka2 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2019
    Likes:
    4
    Location:
    Netherlands
    No? Ever heard of this one Parrondo's paradox
     
    jekhb1976 likes this.
  9. jekhb1976

    jekhb1976 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2019
    Likes:
    123
    Location:
    Holland
    that's a very very smart reply pal!
    i thought i was the only one around here who knew about ABBABBABBABBABBABBA gameplay. 100 likes (if i could give them) for you my friend.
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2019
    Ka2 likes this.
  10. Sharptracker

    Sharptracker Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2018
    Likes:
    139
    Location:
    Belgium
    You can't apply Parrondo paradox at roulette, it would have been done allready.

    And please... check what you could get on a million of spins where "you could" apply it...
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2019
    Richie likes this.
  11. SERGIO

    SERGIO Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2018
    Likes:
    9
    Location:
    ESPAÑA
    • Please write in ENGLISH.
    [QUOTE = "Ka2, post: 66259, miembro: 5054"] ¿No? Alguna vez escuché de esta paradoja de Parrondo [/ QUOTE]
    Hola, Ka2, un placer.
    Escuché sobre la paradoja del parrondo, incluso he estado trabajando en ello durante mucho tiempo y creo que tengo la forma o equivalente de dyksexlic.
    Sé que usted es una de las personas que tiene información o sabe lo que hace Dyksexlic, me gustaría poder hablar con usted en privado.
    Si eres tan amable, hablamos.
    Skype: [removed].

    Saludos
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 14, 2019
  12. Nathan Detroit

    Nathan Detroit Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Likes:
    288
    deleted by N D
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2019
    Mako likes this.
  13. Mako

    Mako Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2018
    Likes:
    146
    Location:
    Irvine, CA
    Good job ND, that guy Sergio says he has 4, count em 4, grails...including vaddi, dyksexlic, turbo, and others. And yet he’s in still in every thread on every roulette forum, every single day, nearly 24 hours a day at that, searching searching searching for help and spamming his Skype and praying that someone is stupid enough to engage him.

    Strange behavior for someone with so many grails to choose from... ;)
     
  14. Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone

    Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone Well-Known Member Lineage to Founders

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2015
    Likes:
    413
    Occupation:
    Shoe Cobbler
    Location:
    Merica
    You need to reread the article on it. It in no way whatsoever will help you win at roulette.
     

  15. Ka2

    Ka2 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2019
    Likes:
    4
    Location:
    Netherlands
    • Violation of Rule #4
    You can find me on [removed] as well. You can pm me there. But in english please.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 16, 2019
  16. SERGIO

    SERGIO Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2018
    Likes:
    9
    Location:
    ESPAÑA
    • Violation of Rule #4
    I thought I had translated it, there was an error when translating.
    where does he say I can send me a pm? in [removed]? Or where??
    thanks for answering, greetings
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 16, 2019
  17. SERGIO

    SERGIO Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2018
    Likes:
    9
    Location:
    ESPAÑA
    What does it have to do to know how to play Turbo, vaddis, dyksexlic, to be able to talk to people who also know how to do the same or similar to them and talk to them ?? Does it bother you to talk to people? Does it bother you not to talk to you ?? It's not my problem, I only talk to people who can really talk about what they know and they are really nice, I do not like talking to people who only judge others, it's that easy. he who does not understand it or does not want to, is his problem.
     
  18. Ka2

    Ka2 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2019
    Likes:
    4
    Location:
    Netherlands
    • Violation of Rule #4
    I'm a member on [removed] also google it. It doesnt seem possible to contact me here.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 16, 2019
  19. SERGIO

    SERGIO Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2018
    Likes:
    9
    Location:
    ESPAÑA
    • Violation of Rule #4
    I already send you a PM in [removed], when you can, answer me if you are so kind, thanks
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 16, 2019
  20. Ka2

    Ka2 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2019
    Likes:
    4
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Sorry to burst your bubble but this data is wrong. I did a quick test in Excel and within 200 sets of 111 spins. I already got 5 111cycle's without a 6th or more hits. So the data above cant be right?
     

Share This Page