1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette Probability of winning system being proved

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by Half Smoke, Jul 23, 2023.

  1. Half Smoke

    Half Smoke Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2018
    Likes:
    50
    Location:
    Rockville, MD
    .
    re the probability of a winning money management or bet selection system for roulette or baccarat being proven to be a long term winning system on this forum or on any similar gambling forum

    if a sports book were to make a line on that happening it would pay out like Powerball lottery

    at the very least a $1.00 bet that something will be proved would pay $1 million

    more likely $5 million



    hysterical-laughter.gif
     
  2. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,041
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Why not just say that in your opinion it will never be proven?

    On the other hand the Reading Randomness thread, now over 604 thousand views, is an actual peer review thread to conduct a self actuated experiment to validate the theory that coincidental change is a valid and provable idea.

    You might know that the foundation for validation of counting cards in Blackjack is based on the principle for variable change. I have declared that the theory for Reading Randomness is based on coincidental change. This leads directly to the existence of an unknown math if validated by the results. The same objective is to become aware of similar conditions for taking advantage of these coincidences using the very same tactics for placing bets while in an advantage state. It's not the cause of a mathematical based variable change. It's because of coincidences in short term sequencing that have been shown to be effective at times.

    You can take advantage of these effectiveness conditions if you are skilled to do so.

    So the question should not be will it ever be validated with odds running around that of winning the lottery. The question should be how many skilled players will need to come forward and show that the skillful player has in fact changed a players win to loss ratio from at 50 / 50 to around 64 / 36. In other words an EC can be played at a two to one win to loss ratio by a skilled coincidental change player.

    Now the best part. "Do the Math."
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2023
    Keyser Soze likes this.
  3. baccarou

    baccarou Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2022
    Likes:
    193
    Location:
    U.K.

    Your post actually makes little sense because anyone with a winning strategy wouldn't need to worry about the long term with some average luck and a bit of chutzpah.

    Reminds me of this Jewish guy who comes to my local casino and always brings a hefty bankroll with him. He starts of betting £500 on the even chances at roulette, once he builds up a head of steam, he then ups the ante to £1000. The other night he was killing it and asks if he can up the bets to £2000. The manager says no! Do you think this guy is worrying about the long term? He is killing it in the here and now and walked out with 50k the other night. Maybe he doesn't have a winning strategy but he is making hay well the sun shines.
     
    gizmotron likes this.
  4. Half Smoke

    Half Smoke Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2018
    Likes:
    50
    Location:
    Rockville, MD
    .
    keep talking Gizmo - round and round in circles
    you're going to accomplish your goal - for sure

    you're going to fool some stupid people

    some of them will actually believe you know something

    .
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2023
  5. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,041
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Typical loser response, attack the messenger.

    There are people on the thread that have published their results. These people must be all suckers in your eyes.

    It is not necessary to cast dispersions to make your point. When irrefutable evidence stairs you in the face you will need to come face to face with the reality that you have been wrong all along. It's that or you just like trolling threads.
     
  6. Sentinel 1

    Sentinel 1 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2023
    Likes:
    13
    Occupation:
    Pro roulette player.
    Location:
    Uk
    I will prove it soon. I have a system that has never had a losing month. And its a FLAT BET system. Most sets the maximum drawdown is 4 units. No sweaty edge of the seat moments hoping that last spin lands or its asta la vista bankroll.

    I risk 2.5% of my bankroll per bet. And have never been in danger of losing even 20% of my roll. I need nothing to prove it. Because even when I do. Very few people have what it takes mentally to stay with a winning system.
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2023
    Rond1nell1 likes this.
  7. Richie

    Richie Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2019
    Likes:
    125
    Location:
    UK
    Sure, this system is one where your subscribers pay you $50 per month lol.

     

  8. Sentinel 1

    Sentinel 1 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2023
    Likes:
    13
    Occupation:
    Pro roulette player.
    Location:
    Uk
    No its going to be 100% free on here. I've scrapped the idea of an online site. I'm making plenty of money from PATTERN 7 itself.
     
  9. Richie

    Richie Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2019
    Likes:
    125
    Location:
    UK
    Fixed that for ya champ.
     
  10. Sentinel 1

    Sentinel 1 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2023
    Likes:
    13
    Occupation:
    Pro roulette player.
    Location:
    Uk
    Your obsesssion with people who sell systems. Arr could it be you were ripped off a few times didums. Yeah thats it isnt it. Poor Richie boy spent his hard earned cash and it was all in vain lmao! Couldnt create anything yourself because that takes intelligence. So you were mugged off by a cockney looking for season ticket money for Millwall werent ya cockle. lmao!
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2023

Share This Page