1. Welcome to the #1 Gambling Community with the best minds across the entire gambling spectrum. REGISTER NOW!
  2. Have a gambling question?

    Post it here and our gambling experts will answer it!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Discussions in this section are assumed to be EV- as they are outside of the Advantage Play section. For EV+ discussions, please visit the Advantage Play section.
    Dismiss Notice

Roulette Progressive Attack

Discussion in 'Roulette Forum' started by BlueAngel, Mar 31, 2017.

  1. BlueAngel

    BlueAngel Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2016
    Likes:
    83
    Location:
    nowhere
    My principle is simple: take advantage of "hot" numbers as long as they last within a certain spins' range.
    A specific spins' range need to be determined in order to separate the ex-hot from the hot numbers.
    Hot and cold numbers may change from time to time, otherwise a hot or cold number would remain always like this.
    Of course this is far from the truth, thus we need an accurate criterion in order to predetermine when a number is "hot" in order to bet it.

    I have extensively studied results in order to determine the ideal range of spins for hot numbers, I've concluded that a range of 25 spins (last 25 results on revolving basis) is the optimum.
    We need a list of the last 25 outcomes which will be updated constantly after every new result.
    You should remove the oldest number from the list and add the newest.
    In this list we are looking for numbers with 2 or more appearances, all of them are going to be potential winners.

    The betting progression will be as follows:
    Place 1 unit on each and every number with 2 or more hits from the list of last 25 spins.
    Add 1 unit on each number till you reach a new bankroll high or till 12 successive bets.
    When you eventually win check if a new bankroll high has been reached, if yes, then restart the procedure, if not, continue by adding 1 unit till you reach new bankroll high or till 12th consecutive bet/spin.
    If you lose 12 times in a row restart by betting 1 unit on your selected numbers.

    25 spins qualification plus 12 spins betting makes 37 spins on rotational basis, an ever evolving cycle.
    I've to admit that this betting method is aggressive but the profits are high.

    You'll need a bankroll of approximately 1,000 units.
    I begun testing it with 500 units and gain gradually more than 10,000 units, however I don't recommend you to start with 500 because I've tested it without the 12 units/spins limit and the biggest drawdown was approximately 3,000 units including the active bets.
    When the biggest drawdown happened it has already gained about 6 and a half thousand units, therefore has never reached a negative level.

    These results come from a sample of approximately 2,300 spins from brick and mortar casino on a single zero wheel.

    First test it to see with your own eyes and thank me later!
     
  2. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    So why are you telling everyone?
     
  3. BlueAngel

    BlueAngel Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2016
    Likes:
    83
    Location:
    nowhere
    To take a slight taste of what I have.
     
  4. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    So I'll clue you on on something.

    The optimum is 35. Every time you get a hit in less than 35 spins, on a speculation of one single number, you are in tall cotton. Now a hot number that hits 20 times in 300 spins averages out to one hit every 15 spins. You've got to play the hot averages. 25 is cutting yourself short by 10. Now what I'm suggesting is winning after 3000 spins. You must find a way to beat the average. You must know when you are in a great sequence. At times like that you need to double the bets. You must also know when a session is not so good so you need to keep the bets small. In that way you control the situation.
     
  5. BlueAngel

    BlueAngel Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2016
    Likes:
    83
    Location:
    nowhere
    But since you found the average on 15 spins frequency/intervals why to start from 35th?

    What you suggest is not necessarily opposite from my method because you use a 3000 events horizon while I'm using a revolving/evolving 37.
     
  6. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I see that I have completely failed to communicate with you. I'm saying that when you get 20 hits in 300 you get 15 for an average. When you get the real average of 12 hits in 300 for a hot number there is not a lot of room for error. That's just 3 wins above breaking even. In no way is this about being the opposite of anything. It takes several winning sessions of 300 spins to make up for just a few losses on numbers that never reached 9 wins out of 300 spins. You will get losing sessions. It is pointless to use a trigger against randomness. You must learn that first.

    So go ahead and have your joy ride until you see what it really costs you. Take your trigger and your "25" into a casino and see what it tastes like. Sometime a person needs to eat shit so that they will know in the future not to try it again.
     
  7. BlueAngel

    BlueAngel Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2016
    Likes:
    83
    Location:
    nowhere
    So if according your observations the average is 15 spins why don't you use this instead of 35 spins, why 35?

    Speaking for yourself perhaps, regarding your gambling experiences...don't assume everyone did and does like you did and do.
     

  8. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    You don't get it. It's simple arithmetic. A lot of times you get 12 hits in 300 spins. Some times you get only 10. Many times you get 14 to 18. But in all of those sessions the hottest number tends to sleep at least 50+ spins while still being the hottest number. Where is your considerations for changing conditions? You can't have a "Happy Meal" every time you walk in the door of a casino. Most people know this.
     
  9. BlueAngel

    BlueAngel Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2016
    Likes:
    83
    Location:
    nowhere
    According to whom? you?

    Most people are losers for a reason.
     
  10. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Just take your great systems to a casino and put your money on the line. You need this period of experience.
     
  11. BlueAngel

    BlueAngel Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2016
    Likes:
    83
    Location:
    nowhere
    Obviously you don't know me...
    In my point of view you are a mix of Ion Saliu (Ro-maniac) streaks theory and John Patrick's Golden Retriever progression.
    Unfortunately there is nothing you could teach me but thank you for your generous offer.
     
  12. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    So just what sock puppet are you? By the way, I invented the list of characteristics for reading randomness in the game of Roulette. John Patrick has not even suggested one tenth of that list.
     
  13. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I can't believe the wacky systems you are suggesting. Did you have a bad Acid trip?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 31, 2017
  14. BlueAngel

    BlueAngel Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2016
    Likes:
    83
    Location:
    nowhere
    Probably you are the one in LSD trip!
    Can you listen to yourself??
     

  15. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    I'm glad you are in phase one. You are a retribution on yourself, and it is well deserved. Just blab away. I just wanted to warn people off of your grand expose' of system achievements.

    I'll bet you have no idea what a sleeping dozen is?
     
  16. BlueAngel

    BlueAngel Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2016
    Likes:
    83
    Location:
    nowhere
    It's you daydreaming of winning invisible bets on dozens.
     
  17. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    "That's a non-denial denial."
     
  18. BlueAngel

    BlueAngel Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2016
    Likes:
    83
    Location:
    nowhere
    Sorry, I meant invincible.

    ''A psychiatrist falls asleep while watching TV, he dreams that he's dreaming...when he wakes up he won't recall his dream.''
    ''If all animals around earth understood the meaning of flattery then carnival and thanksgiving would be the shame day...''
    "With wings of moonlight I fly along black velvet to be where I once was...''
     
  19. gizmotron

    gizmotron Well-Known Member Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Likes:
    3,040
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    The West Coast of USA, RV'ing
    Look, I know you are a "special snowflake," also known as artificial intelligence. You will spend your entire life trying to figure out why your fake life doesn't work. It's the unfortunate consequence of your age and the education that was available to you. It's the main problem with 90% of the Millennials in America. They don't know they were used in a pragmatic social experiment. They were force fed post modern relativism. In a nut shell, they were deliberately lied to in order to bring about social change.

    I believe that psychiatrists will wake up and classify the possibility for liberalism in Millennials as a kind of group mentality form of personality disorder. They have similarities with issues like disagreement and defense mechanisms in similar with individual personality disorders like codependency and control manipulation. They can't relate to the truth. They have been taught that truth is nothing more than a weapon to maintain the power of the establishment. They have been classically trained to think that all information is subjective and therefore valid. It is automatic that they can't hear the truth.

    There is no point in debating validation with regards to what you will face in the future. I'm glad. Retribution is built into you by design. So what are you going to do when you discover that you were lied to? I hope you get mad at the liberals that did this to you. They will try to blame it on the opposition just like they always do. When you get mad, you had better get the right target or we will take you out for being a foolish tool. You are part of the first expendable generation. If you can't wise up you will destroy yourselves. You in Greece are the poster child argument for running out of other people's money. Just take a look at Argentina. They are in the death throes of social justice, running out of other people's money.

    The future of the world is in the hands of the Millennials. They are tools that will perhaps reach a point of uselessness. I can't feel sorry for them. You were ruined on purpose. I blame the radicals of the 60's. But they completely succeeded in their goals. If you knew what you don't know you would be mad enough to kill. I just want you to kill the right targets. If the Millennials want to get even then they should target the VIP liberals and college professors that did it. Tweak!
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 31, 2017
  20. BlueAngel

    BlueAngel Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2016
    Likes:
    83
    Location:
    nowhere
    Indeed, but unless you feel the vibrations of the interconnected polarization you are lost.
    In the world we are living, the words duality and diversification prevail.
    The two opposite forces strive for dominance but result in equilibrium, there are attraction and repulsion energies in action, action and inactivity, movement and stillness...
    If the speed of the moon was greater than the earth's gravity pull, it would get away by the centrifugal force, if the gravity was stronger the moon would crash to earth, but the two opposite forces find balance through the extremes, is it just a coincidence?
    Is human existence and life evolved by accident?
    The world you see is the world you be.
     

Share This Page