Roulette Rambling about SERIES AND SINGLES.

Hi Gentlemen,
and due respect to my Guru.
=======================
Rambling about SERIES AND SINGLES.

Everyone knows the..
Law of SERIES&SINGLE...


their deviation probability,
and that,

AFTER LONG RUN,
they MAY balanced themselves...
to nearly 50/50, albeit a little deviation.

[And with ROULETTE,
ZERO is rather a nuisance here,
but since we going to BET the BALANCING of SERIES/SINGLE,
Zero may have less chance to cause loss.]

If u do a graph, or chart, a line of SERIES only, or SINGLE only..[of HIT, plus +1, -1],
U will see an oscillating up and down, albeit thin and fat "plateau" wave....

So how u bet to win, by the wave?

One of the popular idea is to bet when ,
the other side have won immensely, say +20, and bet flat bet the loser, HOPING that the loser will catch up...

The other popular bet, is to wait for huge deviation, then hoping they will balanced , in a new run , with progression, of course...
================

and SOMEONE suggest that after u see a series of TWO, bet that two wont be three as Two has more chances than three to hit...???



any ideas???
=============


Thanks for reading.

 

SOMEONE suggest that after u see a series of TWO, bet that two wont be three as Two has more chances than three to hit...???

"Someone" is wrong."

RRR only has a lesser chance of hitting than RR when you make your declaration before the first spin. After RR, what are the chances of another R? Of a B? Exactly the same.

How do I know this? Lost a ton of $$$ learning it. It is an illusion!

Hear me now and believe me later.

TwoCat

 

I totally agree TwoCat.
There are people selling so called systems using this strategy with a martingale. I have seen runs of R or B go past 10 a lot, even a dozen or a column will streak. Now I have not studied a million results, but I have seen enough in my opinion this does not work.

 

Everyone except me perhaps. You call it a "Law"??
What is it?