Roulette Random games selected from R-sim with at least 60 spins.

So, fallacy is being debated.
To me there is a known average for repeats of 1-3-5-7 &30 @60 spins.
We will see how short or better repeats can be over 60 spins.
You'll see Top3 & Top9 being shown.
The excel shows the horse race.
How quick the laps of 9, 1x and 9R laps fill.
The above average shows in games for live German games, air-ball games, RNG.

Let's mention the KFC fan, Dr Sir Anyone Anyone; who's 10'330 live star spins shows the
above repeats average. Posted in the fallacy thread.


This game is username. You can take a look at R-sim. There is no secret.
Meant the #18 goes R4

 

Looked at 1st game, 63 spins.
Let us take a look at the 277 spins that we are really only interested in 60 spins.

 

93 numbers from 277
would you not win?

 

I'm still not sure how to utilise your avgs best. Increase stake if repeats behind seems more logical, but one cant play all numbers, so top 3, 6 or 9? Early on seems to make more sense to play top 9 after at least 1 match is in from top 3 early. At later laps 5x+ spin gap grows while top 9 fill slower so playing them even if you'd get 6 hits on T9 vs 2 on avg for T3 makes less sense.

 

Gigi. I want to see how top 9 is showing. I was just using top 3.


If we look at R3 Top9 had 14 matches, Top3 has just 4. If we times T3 by 3, its still behind.
But look at matches now. 9 for T3 and 21 for T9. Times T3 by 3 and you have 29 to 21 betting less numbers.
R2 filled in 63 spins and R3 has 93 spins and has not completed.
Would you now consider betting 9, R2 to complete R3?

 

Have a problem at R-sim, can't login.
Better still, let's look at the holy grail for spins weisbaden. Everyone thinks RNG is fixed.
But you have seen various 60 R-sim spins posted in threads. There is no difference to here.
Yesterday table 4.

What a start; as said top9 gets top3 matches. Only part is betting 9, 1x untill have 9, R1. So profit a little smaller.
4 repeats 15 spins.

 

Be back later child minding duties, that's being a grandparent for you.

 

Should I go all-in on Top3, or take a gamble on the Top9? It's like trying to choose between playing Minesweeper blindfolded or solving a Rubik's Cube with one hand tied behind your back. I mean, R2 filled in 63 spins, and now R3 is just playing hard to get at 93 spins and counting - talk about commitment issues! Should I throw my bets on the elusive Top9 and hope for the best, or sit back and watch the Top3 struggle to catch up?

 

Here is the answer

Yesterday table 4.
Repeats are better than non-hit by 2.
At 33 spins you have 9,R1. You drop all 9, 1x and bet those 9, R1 till spin 59. You see the hits in blue.
But you would be better to bet just top3 of each lap. Less numbers.

Here is what you need to see. Have many games and see how often the top9 start better to top3.
Remember top9 will get top3 matches.
How many spins to fill R3. Say 90?
~35 was spin 60. 2 spins and #10

 

I'd have stopped with the 5th #29. You go get the other spins and see how quick lap R3 completes.

 

Todays 31/1/24 table 4.

 

As said problem with login on R-sim.
So this is an unrated game.

Top 3 slow with matches. But still won with top 3.


123 spins about an hour in B+M

 

1/2/24