Roulette Reading Randomness

Hey Black 'n' Low old timer, at least have the kahunhas to state whom that remark is directed at? If it is some slimly dig at JacobBlaze's absence, what about RustyShack, do you really think he is now taking down the house with JB's super secret copywrited bet 2 regress to 1 on the Bank method?

And what have you ever posted, in the last 15 years, which could be classed as valued? Fuck-all fella, FUCK-ALL LOL

 

It is so wonderful to have you here and to see you in your spandex suit. You gonna save the world with a single bound? BTW, A--hole, you are a continuing trend.

 

I'm sorry but for tax reasons I can't answer that for you. I'm on the fence right now with casual recreational hobby player or Pro. I travel around RV camping. All I need is to keep going, "another day above ground" and all that stuff.

In the USA all money earned at a casino is considered taxable income. Each state wants their own grab at the bag along with the Federal rake as well. If I go pro then I will have to pay 16% more for Social Security payments too. And this is the rub. If I stay in one place, in one state, and declare that as my home base, then I can write-off a rented car, rooms, gas, and meals to offset my casino earnings. But if I travel to a casino in my RV and stay in the parking lot, or even a near by campground, then I can't write-off any travel expenses. So, It does not pay to RV travel and to be a pro. So it's a hobby for me. And this way I don't need a law firm to help me prove to the IRS that I actually am a pro. That's a hurtle to jump over here too. You have to prove you are a pro in order to get write-offs. I do love these other countries that don't charge tax on casino winnings. Here is another big deal too. If I go to another country or gamble online out of the USA I get taxed here on all those wins too.

It does not actually pay to be rich. You can screw them all in the ass by being poor. So I just take what I need and give up my measly little morsel to them. Buying a mountain of things is a suckers trap anyway. Most people get stuff because it impresses people that they don't even actually care about. It's a fool's trip. All you get is higher taxes and a pile of junk that you have to carry around.

 

Can you predict with your randomness reading skills when GBP£ downtrend will stop because of Boris?.

 

Certainly, of course I have that skill. Anything that is headed down or already at the bottom only has one direction to move. At some point the big move will be back up. Gold is on the rise. The chickens are running scared in the stock markets. The laugh is that the trading bots are all on automatic control. This happened before. This is actually a buying opportunity. If China wants to corner itself in hopes of looting the world even more then they have made a calculated mistake. It's human nature to stick to what has always worked. The world only needs to find another place to get durable goods. I believe that China will make a calculated move and try to cooperate with the world on trade before their market gets the old Spanish Archer. That alone is an actual force to be reckoned with. The world is in the driver's seat. All we have to do is say no more Chinese crap. Vietnam is already poised to start making new "Dogshit out of Hong Kong;" ref; "Top Gun." Just watch the trade war. That's the only thing needed to see this blip thru the next 2 months. We either make a meaningful trade deal with China or we start a new cheaply "made in" importer from somewhere else.

There is only one thing left to sour the markets. That's when social welfare programs run out of other people's money. It's happening to individual states here in the USA. Golden pension funds are running dry. People are escaping the high tax states and moving to states where tax oppression and regulations are minimized by large margins. Companies are on the move too. Don't forget the idiots that are brain washed too. There is an entire generation of idiots that love to believe lies and fantasies that are ready to take over the voting majorities. So my reading randomness prediction is this. The socialists will take over, end cow flatulence, seize all the guns, save the planet by funding the elites with carbon taxes, and turn the medical industry into a death squad for friends of socialists programs. The end result of that will be that America will go broke and not be able too afford any longer being the policeman of the world. Defense will fall on all nations to defend themselves and a new dark age will evolve. Embrace the horror.

 

Mark ,



Well spoken but.......What about Boris ? Should he get a hair cut ?

 

He needs a new publicist.

 

So we have this idea that all you need is three net wins.

This single on one side streak is perfect for getting those three.

Code:

| X    | -- 13
|    X | -- 14
| X    | -- 15
| X    | -- 16
|    X | -- 17
| X    | -- 18
|    X | -- 19
| X    | -- 20
|    X | -- 21
| X    | -- 22
| X    | -- 23
| X    | -- 24
|    X | -- 25
| X    | -- 26
| X    | -- 27
|    X | -- 28
| X    | -- 29
|    X | -- 30
| X    | -- 31
|    X | -- 32
| X    | -- 33

For twenty spins in a row the right side hits as a single. You notice this pattern by 6 spins into it. So you just bet the next bet after a hit on the right side once. As long as the right side keeps hitting as a single you will get at least one hit on the left side right after the single. In just a few spins you get your three net wins. You could lose on the first try and you will be down 1 unit. If it wins then the next try is a free shot. If it wins then you have a win or lose try on the third try where you will still get net 1 on the win side in the aggregate if it loses. Otherwise you make your three net wins. The only skill you have is hunting for streaks of singles on the weak side. That is enough to become a millionaire.

With $25 chips you will bet $450 per bet. At 3 net wins at $450 you get $1,350 per day. Times 20 a month and you get $27,000 per month. That's $320,000 per year. Do that for three years and you have your million. So I have demonstrated just hunting one randomness characteristic and how to exploit it. Imagine if you could hunt strings of singles, (Chop), and see short bursts of that. You could take one of the three net wins from each burst. You look for bursts of singles that pack together in spurts of fours or bigger. All kinds of things swarm in bursts of four or bigger. There is an absence of triples, doubles, and singles. This stuff happens. You don't need prediction. You just need to see swarms. This is just two types of characteristics regarding singles.

Like I said. It's all about the first try bets. You get them in a winning session and you don't in a losing session. These are exact moment swarms of losses. It's rarer than you might think. Just try hunting a swarm of first try losses. It's harder than you might think. There is no magic force out there causing these swarms to occur. They are a natural part of randomness.

So now you have at least one skill to go hunting for. You have all the knowledge. There is enough to try it for yourself. Your game might be Baccarat, Craps, Blackjack, or Roulette. This is a weakness in randomness for any Even Chance game. You need an easy way to see singles on the weak side.

 

Giz, I arrived late to the party and was wondering what the columns 0-6; P and S stand for.
Thanks. NBN

 

Thank you, can you tell me the GBP/USD average price reversal, you can be wrong 100 pips if you want, thanks to TurboGenius'discovery of the aggressive martingale I will open several orders: 1. (2000$ x Leverage 20) if it continues to go down: 2. (4000$ x Leverage 20) if it continues to go down: 3. (8000$ x Leverage 20) and the ultimate step: 4. (16000$ x Leverage 20).

Like Turbo said: Random has limits and Elvis: what can go wrong using this unbeatable method?. But before going all in, I need confirmation it works not only on roulette repeaters, but also on currency pairs and as Turbo didn't release his HolyGrail book yet ,I can't know, I am not Einstein.

 

I hope you are kidding. I'm a firm believer in the big long term movements in long term investment strategies. (Ref; Motley Fool) www.fool.com

 

from my software:

-- put "1,2,9,10,13,14,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,35,36,37,38," into zro ( 0 - 6 ) -- zeros
-- put "3,4,5,6,7,8,11,12,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,31,32,33,34," into sxs ( 0 - 6 ) -- sixes

-- put "1,2,3,4,5,6,11,12,17,18,23,24,27,28,31,32,37,38," into prm -- ( Primes)
-- put "7,8,9,10,13,14,15,16,19,20,21,22,25,26,29,30,33,34,35,36," into nPrm -- (Not Primes)

-- put "5,10,11,12,13,15,20,21,22,23,25,30,31,32,33,35,37,38," into spcl -- (Specials)
-- put "1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,14,16,17,18,19,24,26,27,28,29,34,36," into nSpcl -- ( Not Specials)

I had these forms left over as memorized formations based on pie cut slices of the wheel. This is left over junk from my own magical belief period where I thought sectors on a wheel somehow meant that randomness would be less volatile. I made this crap up on my own back in 1995 without any knowledge of the beliefs of Kimo Li. Lucky for me that I got past that phase of learning.

Having them already memorized I decided to use them when I play. They are basically coin flip groupings where one side is observed occurring against another. I'm just using the inside layout to make up 6 more sets that form 3 unique groups. When I add the table layout, outside bets, to the mix I get 6 total groups made up of 12 sets this way. All this fits on a 3" by 5" lined index card. You can hold them in your hand and fill them out while the dealer is paying off the winners. Live play is slow enough to write, read, and select the next bet. You can do this at home while watching live spins on the internet if they are real wheels with real players to get paid off. Germany has a live feed of several wheels that are about the same speed as a brick & mortar casino.

 

Advice of this nature is not available for Baccarat. No wonder the game of Baccarat is being placed on the back burner .


ND

 

Yeah but it is always somebody's else post isn't it ND, why can't you post something along the above line. Surely the length of time you've been gambling, you could at least contribute something a little bit more substantial than advising folk to bet "Black and Low".

Otherwise, it's a bit like sitting in your rocking chair, letting everybody else do the heavy lifting and the sum of your contribution is merely passing the odd comment.

Come on, how about it??

 

So here is another thing to be on the lookout for. It's the absence of singles. This happens too.

Code:

|    X | -- 58
|    X | -- 59
| X    | -- 60
| X    | -- 61
|    X | -- 62
|    X | -- 63
| X    | -- 64
|    X | -- 65
|    X | -- 66
|    X | -- 67
|    X | -- 68
|    X | -- 69
|    X | -- 70
|    X | -- 71
|    X | -- 72
| X    | -- 73
| X    | -- 74
|    X | -- 75
|    X | -- 76
| X    | -- 77
| X    | -- 78
| X    | -- 79
| X    | -- 80
| X    | -- 81
|    X | -- 82
| X    | -- 83
| X    | -- 84
|    X | -- 85
|    X | -- 86
|    X | -- 87
| X    | -- 88
| X    | -- 89
| X    | -- 90
| X    | -- 91
|    X | -- 92
|    X | -- 93

That was 35 events in a row with just 2 singles. I would have never reached the bottom of this. You would have to be an idiot not to get 3 net wins of the big bet with this stretch. All you do is use the tactic that a single will not appear. You can't lose two in a row if you just take one win after each changed side. People are always asking what to bet on. Sometimes the casino puts up a giant billboard that reads "Kick My Ass." Well, actually randomness says "Kick Their Assess." The point is that the casino thinks that seeing opportunities don't actually exist. And that's good, as long as that keeps happening.

 

I see that frequently at the Baccarat tables, but it's always after the event!!!

 

So discussing when you see a trend and acting on it would be a good topic to get to?

I cut my teeth on jumping in. It's so easy with 50 / 50 chance EC's. It's breaks down like this. You risk one guess and it either pays you 100% or it takes 100%. If you lose the entry bet then you know that the perfect trend has ended. I know to jump on an absence of singles. It might be a bumpy start but many times I can net at least one net win from the streak.

Every session shows you if it's easy or if it's difficult. I don't care if it's difficult. I'm going to get my winning session if it takes all day. I gave this example so that the characteristic can be taught. Even you recognize it. This is not a case of not seeing it. People can learn how to exploit better looking phases of characteristics by gaining experience in actually trying it in practice. It should be learned in practice. It will cost you nothing just to see how good you get at it.

This will happen to some people. They will begin trying trends and it will be session after session that is nothing but difficult. But if you look at these sessions you will see that a lot of first try bets have lost. That is the way randomness works. I'm interested in teaching people by lifting weights in order to make them stronger. You won't actually understand this stuff until you have seen easy and difficult sessions, a lot of them.

So I recommend 3 net wins of the big bet as the standard for a won session. I also recommend 7 net lost big bets as the signal of a lost session. I dare you to get a long termed ratio of 4.66 wins to each lost session. I've done this in teaching before. I'd like to see those reading this thread to at least break thru 2.33 won sessions to each lost session. The mathBoyz will tell you that this is impossible. So go ahead and prove them wrong.

 

That would be helpful to a lot of people if it were true.

I'm just about ready to get into micro trends and micro patterns. You guys with single data feeds like Baccarat or Craps see the absence of monster sized trends all the time. In fact you would be lucky to see just one great trend or pattern in a day. "There's gold in them hills."

The absence of a long occurring trend is information too. If you can count on the absence of streaks to continue then you can place your bets as if that type of distribution continues. You've heard me say for years that you can bet on anything that continues. So I have to find examples of this type of characteristic. Why not target the most common occurring characteristic? It all comes down to asking yourself what would happen if an obvious streak was not occurring. This is an acquired skill that takes practice to get good at it. You can't just pick up a guitar and make yourself into Jimi Hendrix after you have just learned your first chord.

In micro trends you only go after one win from the pattern. These are micro events. There are tell tail signs that shed light on their existence. You just need to become aware of them. I win most of my sessions using this technique.

I had to show you the big deal characteristics first. In a sense I'm trying to teach you a kind of synchronicity with these micro trends.

All I can say to trends always ending once you see them or recognize a pattern of any type and they end right then is "REALLY?" Mathematically half of them continue at least one more event, anyway. You need to train yourself to see win streaks and easy fast sessions.

Just imagine a sine wave graph, a curve representing periodic oscillations, where bets go up and down. To beat the sine wave you always stop on the up cycle position. I'm saying that you can target the up-tics three times, before you stop on seven down-tics. That is the task. Don't pay for big bets while the wave is going down. I have no problem visualizing these wave formations. If you are patient and have skills at formation recognition then you can see the up-tics in things that continue. They don't all end once you see them. You just need to know what type of trend or pattern is currently swarming. I can prove patterns and trends swarm just by showing them to you. The trick is to find people that actually see them. Then the task goes to MM. I'm all about timing management. If you have good timing then MM takes care of itself.

 

So here is just riding the variance waves. You can tell where I kept my bet selection until it reached a net win. I just picked the best looking streak.

Code:

 W | B  R | O  E | L  H | 0  6 | P | S |  --  SN  --  SP -- "W" = win
 nb|--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  01  --  37 -- "nb" = no bet
 nb| X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  02  --  24 -- "  -" = lost virtual bet
 nb| X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  03  --  31 -- " X-" = won virtual bet
 nb|    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |  --  04  --  32 -- "   " = lost real bet
 nb|--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  05  --  38 -- " X " = won real bet
 nb| X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  06  --  24 
 nb|--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  07  --  37 
 nb| X    | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  08  --  35 
 nb| X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  09  --  24 
 nb|    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  10  --  18 
   |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  11  --  36 ( $ -20 ) Six's
  -|    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  12  --  23 ( $ -20 ) Six's
 X-| X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  13  --  22 ( $ -20 ) Six's
   |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  14  --  14 ( $ -40 ) Six's
   |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  15  --  27 ( $ -60 ) Six's
 X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   |   |  --  16  --  19 ( $ -44 ) Six's
 X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  17  --  18 ( $ -12 ) Six's
 X | X    |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  18  --  08 ( $ 20 ) Six's
 X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  19  --  03 ( $ 68 ) Not Specials
 X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  20  --  36 ( $ 86 ) Red
 X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  21  --  25 ( $ 122 ) Red
 X-|    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  22  --  12 ( $ 122 ) Red
 X-|    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  23  --  18 ( $ 122 ) Red
  -| X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  24  --  11 ( $ 122 ) Red
 X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  25  --  14 ( $ 140 ) Red

You can see when I used virtual bets. The base value was $18. I used 1, 2, or 3, as multipliers. That means $18, $36, or $54 per bet. Virtual bet selections were $0 and designated by "-" in the Win column on the far left.

 

Mark ,



How about 18 - 36 - 36 protecting and strengthening a cash bankroll ? Just a thought .



ND