Roulette Retarded Ideas Myth and The Absurd

No. This is a retarded statement. Variance = LUCK. Let's phrase the comment above correctly. "The enemy of any bet selection is LUCK." Good or bad. It's the double edged sword that enables you to win or lose. If you don't have the edge over the wheel... which system junkies don't have...then variance is the ONLY thing that's going to enable you to win. Trying to reduce variance is the same thing as trying to reduce any win or loss that you may have. If you don't want any variance, then just bet every number on the wheel.

This is a silly statement. If we replace the word "variance" with "luck" and "negative" with "bad" you will see just how silly the statement appears. "This means if the LUCK of future spins is BAD your betselection has to likewise be in that same direction."

Again, let's replace the word variance with luck. "To change the odds your bet selection must be in line with LUCK.

Yes, another ridiculous statement.

Again, let's replace "variance" with "luck." "The limited input data is insufficient for any meaningful LUCK to form."

Yes, yet another retarded statement.

 

"So at spin 1; what is LUCK telling you?" I'm not sure, but I think luck isn't going to be telling you anything after just one spin! Yes, this statement is retarded.

So? In order of a number to hit once, then it must not have hit at all. Yes, yet another retarded statement.

Ermm...I'm almost speechless over this deep statement. The absurdity of it speaks for itself.
(FYI...In the random game a number that has just hit has the same odds of winning or losing as a number that has not hit over the next series of spins.)



Dismissed!

 

Hello
I want to congratulate you on the good work
which you are doing for the forum
Without you All will develop a theoretical theory of how to win and do it.
honestly every day I am amazed by your conclusions.
...
Everything is clear we just have to find this friend luck and hold him by the hand and he'll take us to the win.
...
I did not believe it
it's so simple.
...
Today I just could not stand it, I had to write something

 

"The ignornat doth protest too much, methinks" 2018 Turbo Shakespeare.

 

How do you understand what wheel is bias?
How do you find "the bias" ?
What do you looking for ?
If we find the bias ...
We are finding Mr Luck.

 

I am covinced that Caleb is not real and is a badly programmed chat bot that hasnt been updated for 15 years..

 

Well in his favor, Caleb has accepted the idea that the few of us that have used guessing and basing those guesses on past spins are not in fact claiming that we can predict the future because of past spins. Add to that nobody has produced mathematical proof that they have beaten the 2.7% or 5.4% house edge in Roulette yet. So Snowman has changes just a smidgen.

 

Haha ,, thats funny!

 

would make sense....the same exact images and GIFs are used

Either he is not real or he is not a true professional player

I don't know, call me crazy, but.....I just do not see an older, professional, roulette bias player concerned with copying and pasting words from other forums to bash them and call them retarded

That seems like it would be beneath someone who was wealthy due to roulette..

when threads like this pop up, who is he trying to convince? After years it seems like he is trying to maybe convince himself

 

Ghost,

You are mistaken. I am as good as it gets, a ruthless professional, evil, and incredibly handsome. I am me. Virile, vigorous, and potent! My words, gifs, and wisdom are priceless opportunities for the simple minded to enjoy. When someone like me insults retards like yourself, Notto, and Cht you should feel thankful.



You are welcome! Now please excuse while I get back to insulting some of you and reminding you of just how retarded you really are.

Sincerely,

Dr. Sir Anyone Anyone.

 

It's time to point out more retarded posting from the ship of fools.

Oh, really? Is that all. Yes, a retarded statement.

Let's again replace the word variance with luck to demonstrate the absurd quote. "So how will LUCK show when to bet for a non-hit or a repeat."
Psst...It won't. It's luck. It will tell you nothing! A fart would be just as informative.

Let's correctly word this one too. "One person shows how to bet for a non-hit by crossings, does LUCK help on making the decision of whether to bet for the crossing or bet for repeat, crossing fail." This is too is an absurd idea written by a foolish gambler.

1. Crossing aren't real. It's more made up BS.
2. Luck's not going to help you make a decision, and neither will an imaginary crossing, or magic.



Variance is luck. Luck is not predictable.

 

Eh. I used to care

But I’m no longer impressed

I highly doubt a “professional” roulette (wtf is that anyway!?) roulette player would behave in this way. Me thinks they wouldn’t care too much about some people on forums

You try too hard

No one really cares anymore

Won’t be too long before you and sister J are history. This forum is your last and final stop

 

@Dr Sir >> You'll have plenty of material, quoting from places like RF and R30.

Ken

 

I don’t think notto cares that a has been calls him a retard

Notto is doin pretty damn good using a mechanical system

 

Curve fitting results, graphing 10 to 30 spins at a time? A...NO! Lol!!!!

Let's pretend for one second that the silly trot produced a small edge of a few percent. If so, the variance that he'd experience would be in the 2000 unit range. Meanwhile the forumtard is testing 10 to 37 spins at a time, fooling himself into believing that he has something. All the while he's really just playing the curve fitting "if, would of could of game."

By the way, there's no side stepping or avoiding variance (luck). Not with short sessions, not with long ones. Luck is unpredictable.

 

If he wins everyday, who cares?

You care a little bit more than you should and it’s freaky