Poker roi doubts

how many tournaments are needed to obtain reliable data of roi?

I've played a few, 607 so far this year, the roi that I have is below the expected or adjusted and I understand that is the bible, I mean that the roi marks you if you're doing right or wrong .... in my case bad but not as bad as brand.

if the few I've played in most of them losing tournament throw you for or losing 70/30 50/50 before the awards, both adjusted roi roi as you mark -100, but in principle these hands Should have won ... is that I looked at my chart of the year and I'm depressed. But looking lost hands you end all-in pre with KK vs A3 or turn with top pair vs two villains the same project carried out in river I think .... you have few tournaments and can be variance and do not know where noticing for see if I do fairly well or not.

thanks for your help, greetings and good luck.:hmpf:

Source.

 

I'll play tourneys (especially sit and go's) in blocks of 100, but to get a realistic ROI number, I want to have 1000.

Good luck at the tables.

 

How about a Skype chat about this subject with a small group of 8-10 players with 100's of documented tournaments and so we can listen to what each have to contribute. No person knows exactly why, but a nugget of gold can shift the dimension seriousely. take an extra 5% seconds instead of thirds, and 3% firsts instead of 2nds and see how dramatically things turn around.

Over the years, working with clients of various bankrolls, I've found them NOT to have the finishing skills and often lack the intensity, guile, and focus to stay the course and attack their opponents, while occasionally trapping them securing in their snare.