Roulette Series/Single, bet selection to better hit?

Hi Gentlemen,
and due respect to my Guru.
===========================

Here another two bad sleeper DOZEN examples, which are worst bad dozen in 185spin, I got from Albalaha.
Many thanks to Albalaha for his sample.
=======================
I try to see how they behave in LW or, in SERIES/SINGLE betselection.
REPEAT or WILL NOT REPEAT.

we may bet 'single dozen' bet, or 'double dozen' bet.

Stop at first hit, in series bet.
Wait for new dozen.

I had try a few samples and all show that they always try to near equilibrium.

THUS imho, this provide a best betselection, where we could avoid long sleeper if we bet a fixed dozen....and with some variance and staking MM, this will be a breeze.
================================

ALBALAHA #1st,
WORST 3rdDOZEN/185SPINS

14B SINGLE1

5A
2A
4A SERIES1

19B SINGLE2

9A SINGLE3

23B SINGLE4

29C SINGLE5

2A SINGLE6

21B SINGLE7

10A
5A SERIES2

36C SINGLE8A

19B
22B
16B SERIES3

29C SINGLE8

21B SINGLE9

6A
0 LOSE1

33C SINGLE10

10A
8A
2A
11A SERIES4

21B
0 LOSE2

29C SINGLE11

20B SINGLE12

10A SINGLE13

17B SINGLE14

1A
0 LOSE3

30C SINGLE15

18B SINGLE16

30C
27C
30C SERIES5

6A SINGLE17

25C SINGLE18

19B SINGLE19

28C
34C SERIES6
0

20B SINGLE20

2A SINGLE21

36C
26C SERIES7

17B
23B SERIES8

5A SINGLE22

23B SINGLE23

25C SINGLE24

16B
15B
23B
16B SERIES9

2A
4A SERIES10

35C
36C SERIES11

15B SINGLE25

33C SINGLE26

19B SINGLE27

31C
0 LOSE4

17B SINGLE28

5A SINGLE29

29C SINGLE30

24B
20B SERIES12

1A
5A SERIES13

14B
23B SERIES14

12A SINGLE31

35C
32C SERIES15
0

4A
7A SERIES16

15B SINGLE32

28C SINGLE33

1A
12A SERIES17

30C
32C
32C
25C SERIES18

5A SINGLE34

13B SINGLE35

36C
36C SERIES19

24B SINGLE36

8A SINGLE37

21B SINGLE38

36C SINGLE39

19B SINGLE40

12A
2A SERIES20

24B
20B
13B SERIES21
0

32C
31C SERIES22

6A
10A
6A
3A
3A
5A SERIES23

33C SINGLE41

17B SINGLE42

27C
27C SERIES24

3A SINGLE43

15B SINGLE44

2A SINGLE45

34C
27C SERIES25

15B SINGLE46

6A SINGLE47

22B
21B SERIES26

7A SINGLE48

21B SINGLE49

5A SINGLE50

31C SINGLE51

14B SINGLE52

26C
33C SERIES27

12A
3A SERIES28

14B SINGLE53

27C SINGLE54

12A SINGLE55

13B SINGLE56

29C
32C SERIES29

16B
14B SERIES30

12A SINGLE57

19B SINGLE58

30C SINGLE59

6A SINGLE60

17B SINGLE61

11A
0 LOSE5

20B
17B
24B SERIES31

30C
26C SERIES32

11A SINGLE62

22B SINGLE63

26C SINGLE64

22B
17B SERIES33

1A
6A SERIES34

13B SINGLE65

34C SINGLE66

20B SINGLE67

31C
31C
32C SERIES35

7A SINGLE68

34C SINGLE69

10A
9A
10A SERIES36

19B
18B SERIES37

11A SINGLE70

32C SINGLE71

3A
12A SERIES38

22B
19B
17B SERIES39

12A SINGLE72

30C
32C
26C SERIES40

-------------------------------------
WE see that the result always NEAR equilibrium, thus the bet selection will easy to bet.

SINGLE=73
SERIES=40
LOSE=5
-------------------
Since I have no mean to test upon million sof spins, thus if u have the mean, please test for millions spins albeit around 200spins INCREMENT.
As u see, million of continuos spins provide no value here as we cant bet millions of spins

Just test to see whether the VARIANCE, will ecart very far, say 5%.

thanks.
------------------
and as usual, I do not try to earn any cent from anyone here, just sharing knowledge.
What u reply sarcastically here, reflect your shortcoming and ignorance!




xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

ALBALAHA #2nd WORST 2ndDOZEN in 185spins


27C SINGLE1

11A SINGLE2

31C SINGLE3

1A
5A SERIES1

13B SINGLE4

34C SINGLE5

19B SINGLE6

12A SINGLE7

14B SINGLE8

34C
0
0 LOSE1

12A
12A SERIES2

24B SINGLE9

4A SINGLE10

30C SINGLE11

3A SINGLE12

36C SINGLE13

7A
8A SERIES3

13B
21B SERIES4

30C SINGLE14

12A
4A SERIES5

34C
28C
30C SERIES6

17B
16B
21B
24B SERIES7

7A SINGLE15

25C SINGLE16

8A
12A
11A
2A
8A
7A
3A SERIES8

20B SINGLE17

7A
0 LOSE2

16B
16B
13B
16B SERIES9

10A
12A SERIES
0
4A

26C SINGLE18
26C SERIES10

14B SINGLE19

1A
12A SERIES11

30C SINGLE20

1A SINGLE21

19B SINGLE22

33C SINGLE23

2A
11A SERIES12

23B SINGLE24

29C
0 LOSE3

12A SINGLE25

21B SINGLE26

7A SINGLE27

31C SINGLE28

9A SINGLE29

24B SINGLE30

2A SINGLE31

34C SINGLE32

11A SINGLE33

18B SINGLE34

31C SINGLE35

2A SINGLE36

28C
0 LOSE3

16B
19B SERIES13

33C SINGLE37

17B SINGLE38

11A SINGLE39

33C
30C
33C SERIES14

14B SINGLE40

5A
4A
5A SERIES15

21B SINGLE41

35C SINGLE42

6A SINGLE43

20B
20B SERIES16

11A SINGLE44

32C
26C SERIES17

18B SINGLE45

6A SINGLE46

29C SINGLE47

15B
16B
16B
20B
13B SERIES18

1A
5A SERIES19
6A
0
7A

20B SINGLE48

7A
2A SERIES20

34C
26C SERIES21

10A SINGLE49

28C SINGLE50

5A SINGLE51

36C SINGLE52

24B
0 LOSE4

6A SINGLE53

33C
26C
29C
28C SERIES22

10A
5A
12A SERIES23

25C
33C SERIES24

16B SINGLE54

30C SINGLE55

1A SINGLE56

23B
21B
22B SERIES25

26C SINGLE57

15B
17B SERIES26

2A SINGLE58

35C SINGLE59

22B SINGLE60

4A SINGLE61

27B SINGLE62

25C
27C SERIES27

19B
0 LOSE5

36C
25C SERIES28

5A
0 LOSE6

14B
18B
22B SERIES29

32C SINGLE63

7A
8A SERIES30

22B SINGLE64

29C SINGLE65

13B SINGLE66

33C
27C SERIES31

16B
20B SERIES32

35C
30C SERIES33

5A SINGLE67

32C
29C SERIES34

2A SINGLE68

22B SINGLE69

36C
34C
27C SERIES35

13B SINGLE70

2A SINGLE71

21B SINGLE72

3A SINGLE73
-----------------------------
WE see that the result always NEAR equilibrium, thus the bet selection will easy to bet.

SERIES=35
SINGLE=73
LOSE=6


xxxxxxxxxxxx









==========================

 

Single/series is merely an illusion. It is indeed one number, that is winning, in every spin. Only true thing about single/series is the sequential probability of their happening.
In a layman's language:
Single is about double likely, in long run, than a series of 2 but almost equally likely if we take all series of 2 or bigger together.
It means,
if we say analyse a million spins and see how many single hits of an EC vs double hits of an EC came, we will see singles will hit almost twice.
If we compare single hits of an EC vs all series starting from 2 consecutive wins, they will be almost equal.
The term "almost equal" represents the presence of variance that doesn't let both counterparts exactly equal even after a million or billion trials.

Now, if you understood the reality of singles and series, you would not like to weave any fallacy around it. Every theory of probability holds good, in long run only and in a short playable session, variance may take away the expected results far away from what is mathematically expected.
If you have confusions regarding what is long run exactly, have a look: http://albalaha.lefora.com/topic/19400636/Long-run-in-gambling#.VU8GNY6qqko

 

Hi Albalaha,
Thanks for your reply.

I think series/single will,
as in any other bet-selection,
hit the worst possible variance.

Do u have sample of series/single of EC,
and Dozens, that have very bad variance?

Thanks in advance.

 

if we do a long series/single,
Say, EC,that has 100,200,300spins...

I think we will always see that the results will always near 50% albeit the pesky zero.

And the dozens, will always near 66/33 %, albeit green.

We do not try to bet that they will go EQUAL, but bet that the variance will not go as far as 5%.

We try to bet that the win/lose will always near the expectation of their math probability.
so we may win even with little progression....with some sort of variance management, of course.

That by itself , a good bet selection.
maybe I just do a few sample that not enough to see the worst.