Roulette Supremely skilled roulette player

I just wanted to put this out there for discussion of the game we all love.

I'll start by saying, I am a supremely skilled roulette player, but I can still lose like the rest of you.

How about you?

 

Using money management to control the speed of winning will also inherently control the speed of losing.

 

Bombus, how long have you studied / played roulette seriously for...10 to 15 years??

So it would be more a bloody surprise if you were not a skilled roulette player!

''We'' all know who the serious one's are and who is blowing smoke up people's backside and also who the freeloading beggars are, lol.

Enjoy your winnings.

enough said!!

 

I can lose on individual spins, but I can't lose a session. At the end of the session I will be in profit.

 

TG, why is it that you can't lose a session?

What if you were down and had to leave the game unexpectedly?

Could you pick up where you left off next time or would you have to cop the loss?

 

I'd have to re-start and then end the session when I was in profit.
You can really make a session any amount of spins or time that you want.
Sure, if I play on Monday and then something happens and I leave - play on Tuesday and then
end the session when I am in profit. I can wrap those results and call it 1 session. (I'm pretty sure there's no rules set in stone as far as how long or how many spins a session is since the player can define it)

 

I would expect most of us here are good roulette players.

It would be interesting if you could kindly post your list of the smoke blowers and the freeloaders please.

 

I agree TG, sessions are not easily defined and everyone should be able to complete their particular game with or without breaks in play.

However, most players it seems need to get a definitive result each time they sit down to play.

 

I suppose. It's a mental thing though really.
Take the PGA - You could have a great golf round on Thursday, a better round under par of Friday, not so great on Saturday and on Sunday you can win the tournament. The 4 day competition is the "session", that bad result on Saturday doesn't mean you didn't win and end up in first place.

 

For me a "session" is 1 (one) visit of casino and even this is not clear definition, because player can play 1 spin or +200 spins in that time. In any spin between 1-200 he can come in net profit and if he stop with play in that moment, then player really cannot lose a session. But who goes home after 5 spins, if he came in first small net profit ;-) But generaly, more you play-more chances you have to catch a negative trend, and then troubles starts as are lack of time and money. So, if either of those two comes and you leaved a casino, you have a losing session in my definition!

Now I understand why someone cannot lose a session if it can lasts a month or even a year ;-)

 

He is mentally handicapped, unable to calculate the house edge after supposedly 20 years of Roulette play, this is scary. But it is not important for him because his martingale on hot numbers beats the house edge lololol.

 

He also has a healthy number of forum members in his ignore list.

 

Lol yes, a complete newbie or a sucker stay in his friend list.

 

Sorry Bago,

I meant to say, he also has a healthy number of unhealthy forum members in his ignore list.

 

You are off-topic, those known to be in his ignore list are the one who curtly corrected him about maths. It makes him sick each time it happens since he wants to appear as a math genius who discovered the HolyGrail to the readers. Therefore his psychiatrist advised him to hit the ignore button and swallow 3 prozac.

 

He plays an online game. He could win every session. Who knows? It's like racking up a 1000-0 record playing a chess computer set to Difficulty #1.

Obviously he's not reporting live roulette results on real games, so anything is possible.

I once knew a supremely skilled astrologer.

 

@redietz

Absolutely, he only plays online game with a cartoon wheel and on RX, that's why he didn't know the chip located on the winning number belongs to the player, not the Casino.

 

Good point, I believe there is not fixed amount of spins to be played, neither fixed amount of units to be won.
Therefore there cannot be a universal definition of a session, but if you ask me the balance between risk and reward defines each session's limit.
For example, if I'm going to risk 300 units I'd try to win 300 units as well, thus all comes down to what is going to happen first.
If for example I begin with 300 units bankroll then raises to 500 and after falls to 200 units, the drawdown is minus 300 units but I've not lost my initial session bankroll of 300 units.
A few sessions are fluctuating endlessly between these limits (+/- 300), in such cases I settle to any profit since the results cannot conclude either way.
My total bankroll is 3 times the session's bankroll, of course I've compounded the units' value as the profit grew over the time, but no matter what's the unit's value I'm keeping the same principles since day 1.
1/3 of the total profit is being reinvested and 2/3 is being used to cover personal needs and savings.

@ Bombus,

What is your definition of a skillful roulette player?

Regarding your reply to Bago, do you consider me 'unhealthy' member?