Roulette System "Hottest Number"

HERES THE CODE,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
system "Hottest Number"

{Bet on the hottest number.
If after 37 spins no new high has been reached, add one to the bet.}

method "main"
begin
While starting a new session
begin
Call "setup"
end
Call "Check SD"
Call "Bet"
end

Method "Check SD"
begin
Calculate StdDev of Number 1 to record "SD Value" data
Put 1 on record "Layout Pointer" data
put 2 on record "Number List" layout index
Loop until record "Number List" layout index > record "Number List" layout count
begin
Calculate StdDev of record "Number List" layout to record "SD Check" data
if record "SD Check" data > record "SD Value" data
begin
put 100% record "SD Check" data on record "SD Value" data
put 100% record "Number List" Layout index on record "Layout Pointer" data
end
Add 1 to record "Number List" layout index
end
put 100% record "Layout Pointer" data on record "Number List" layout index
duplicate record "Number List" record "Target Number"
end

Method "Bet"

begin
Add 1 to record "Spins" data
if record "Spins" data = 38
begin
if Bankroll < record "Prev Bankroll" data
begin
Add 1 to record "Bet Unit" data
Put 0 on record "Spins" data
end
end
if Bankroll > record "Prev Bankroll" data
begin
put 1 on record "Bet Unit" data
put 100% Bankroll on record "Prev Bankroll" data
end
put 100% record "Bet Unit" data on record "Target Number" layout
end

Method "Setup"
begin
copy list [Number 1] on record "Target Number" Layout
put 0 on record "Prev Bankroll" data
put 1 on record "Bet Unit" data
put 0 on record "Layout Pointer" data
put 0 on record "Spins" data
Copy List [Number 1, Number 2, Number 3, Number 4, Number 5, Number 6, Number 7, Number 8, Number 9,
Number 10, Number 11, Number 12, Number 13, Number 14, Number 15, Number 16, Number 17, Number 18,
Number 19, Number 20, Number 21, Number 22, Number 23, Number 24, Number 25, Number 26, Number 27,
Number 28, Number 29, Number 30, Number 31, Number 32, Number 33, Number 34, Number 35, Number 36, Number 0] to record "Number List" layout
end

 

Can someone run a million and post the results..lol

 

Yes, I can.

 

There is a problem with the code (first off)
Secondly, this is not what I'm saying to do.
Playing a number once it's the "hottest" does nothing but fail at the house edge as expected.
There's nothing saying that it's going to keep hitting more than any other number.

 

Rev,

I've run zillions of sims like the one you've suggested over the years. Furthermore, I know the trick to make it work. It's far more labor intensive and requires far more data than you realize in order to make money at it.

If you want to see the simulations sometime, live on Skype, then I'll show you using one of my simulators. Using the simulator I can set various thresholds to qualify a hot number, and various rolling horizons of live data.

(And no, I don't want any money to show you how it works.)

And if Jboy is nice maybe we can throw him a bone and let him watch too.

- Dr Sir Anyone Anyone

 

Can anyone post an example ?

 

Hi ,Caleb i might take you up on that thanks Dave

 

Sample anyone-anyone?

 

old system that flat bets and wins.at some stage i will post the code.no lucky numbers,no hot numbers,cold numbers,or common sense just one simple fact!...history repeats itself.

 

Posted is the results for 28 flat bets,on 2 numbers,all 28 bets win...this is gamblers fallacy method,lmao

 

Erm...only 1600 spins?

 

On how many spins did you actually bet?

 

every spin is bet ,when ur in the UK ill give u a challenge..lol.....u play your wheel and ill play next to you,i might even give you a new out look on roulette.......theres one thing anyone who bets one number and the odds are 35-1 ,using the law of the third wont win .

 

Caleb last post ,sorry its wrong This is manual and i used only 2 numbers a variation on the what goes up must come down methodology.

 

Two points >> It would not matter if it was 88 million spins vs. 1,600......."they" would come up with some lame excuse regardless. All the while, PLAYING your method. (lol), if thats not fu***n comedy.

Second, never ask a BIAS non-method goof to do testing. What do you think the results will be?

Haters be hatin, takers be takin.

Ken

 

This thread has obviously derailed from where it started. Perhaps it could be split.