Roulette The horse race analogy and set completion

Smitridel....thanks for the heads up...got through about half of it so far...(extra busy at work).....some good stuff in there (from the good guys)....

 

Thinking in line with this, we may need to look at sets of numbers that are getting closer and closer to expected below/above/average.

 

TurboGenius wrote:

"
It's all back to the horse race analogy with the horses running randomly down the track.
We know a horse will win - we know it will win well, well below the math expected and certainly
well better than the house payout percentage. This "has" to be the outcome thanks to random"




a horse race is not a random event. usually one horse or 2 have greater ability (speed at the race's distance) than others
they will sometimes lose anyway because they are not feeling good, have a hidden injury or had a bad trip - i.e. got forced wide

but given any decent size sample the top 2 rated horses will win much more often than longshots

when a horse wins it usually pays less that it's true probability suggests - which is theoretical anyway - no one can say for sure what a horse's true odds are - but all but the sharpest players lose because when they do catch a winner it is paying less than it should - and of course they catch too many losers because gamblers love longshots even if they are hopeless because of the large payouts - gamblers being gamblers

 

Wrong. Turbo is saying the horse race is an example. He has made other examples. Your looking at things at face value. You need to look deeper

 

My opinion.

Horse=chosen number, (or street, split, line, dozen)
Randomly running= first time it shows, second time, third etc etc..
Finish line=MI of one, OR the average (example if playing numbers, the average getting closer to 37).

After a number is chosen, I restart a new race.

But what is the race? Because if playing MI, would I want to play the furthest back? Or choose numbers, sets, dozens, etc at an MI of 2 once all have hit. It would be closest to the finish line right? They are all headed to an MI of 1... In MI discussion, it's always chase the last to show.. that's why I'm wondering what the race is.

 

I VERY much like DSAA's fool analogy.


For those being at least adept in the tarot KNOW that
TWO types of FOOLS exist.

In a nutshell, the fool numbered as zero, travels through, masters & completes all major arcana cards or stages - in total 22.
Just to become master - the fool. again


This is very specifically shown at the figurative images two below.
Eyes covered, getting fucked by a cat.
& see the 'prospering' fool. the freestyla [MC Boomfunk]


I guess what DSAA is indirectly suggesting is that
1. no mathematical system has been proven to work, namely to beat roulette - as a persistently applied \shelled methodology
2. that TurboGenius is the fool. with the dot.
3. gives silent ovation to the TG.

 

The horse is dead and with it the thread .

 

The only thing in common between a Horse Race and a Roulette Spin is they are independant events.

Wanting to compare a Horse who is last during the race 'cause for instance he left badly the starting gate AND a cold number during a Roulette session is stupid to say the least. In the first case, the odds of the Horse winning the race (independant event) are slimmer because he has to fill in a large distance comparing to the leaders and unless he has much more class than his opponents, it won't be possible to overcome, but in the second case at the Roulette Wheel a cold number does not have any disavantage whatsoever, unless there is already a ball in its pocket, I don't see why and how it could not be the next winner.

 

Turbo give them a clue on how to put this into practice please ,please please

 

certain things exists intentionally only to procure magnetically-intensified structural dynamic .. purposefully




the other day I saw a woman starting to wail & bitch wildly at a market stand .. [almost] everyone turned around & gathered together, what's its all about
or was it the day before that .. or after

some, a very tiny minority spontaneously began scanning everything else, the totality

some who didnt give a shit about the commotion ..
could swear that it was just about at FIVE ELEVEN

 

He must release his book explaining everything according to what he wrote.., hopefully for Christmas.

 

every fuckin' day

 

Giving Turbo`s book for Christmas ? A white collar crime to say the least .

 

Turbo you need to write a book and sell it on Amazon....

 

I too hope to read TG's book

 

I did not have time to read the whole topic - but is pretty easy to win within cycles of 37 spins playing repeaters ...
This is the results I get betting repeaters with cycles of 37 spins - each bet and each attack is different -

L -28
W +29
W +28
L -25
W +4
W +30
W +24
L -24
L -24
W +14
W +29
W +15
L -28
L -24
L -32
W +32
W +29
W +24
W +29
W +20
W +21
L -25
L -24
W +8
W +15
W +15
W +20
W +28
W +29
L -25
W +30
W +31
W +26
W +4
W +28

 

Congrats for finding the HolyGrail based on a very subtle approach nobody before you tested. Can you show us how you win for real at an online casino with it?. Thanks.

 

I don't believe in Holy Grail and it is pretty amazing what you can achieve with little math and probability ...

Have a nice day ...

Cheers