Roulette The law of the third nonsense.

Many years ago, the law of the third became a fad because of some very successful VB players. They chose to use it as a cover story. Unfortunately (depending on how you look at disinformation) some mentally challenged people believe, to this day, that it somehow magically enables them to win.


When pressed none of the believers can offer a lucid reason as to why it should work.

Where's the logic?

Can anyone state why it, GUT, TROT, KFC should work?

 

I have not seen GUT or KFC on this forum

Can you explain what they are? You seem to be an expert

 

You can email Notto or one of the other forumtards. They can tell you all about it.

 

Figured you’d know right off hand

You seem to know it

 

Ghost,

Do you believe that Notto's system works?

 

I’m trying to find out from you

You sure talk about KFC a lot

Obsessive kind of

Wondering if you could post up some of your wobbly wheel spins and show results using said strategy with those spins

You seem to know the methods you cited in the original post very well

Can you define trot for me. I’m confused by these words

John blerge has acronyms as well. It’s very overwhelming

Help me.

 

I think the way LOTT works is that when it comes to probability random is essentially lazy, and so more often than not, finds the path of least resistance.

Meaning that you are more likely to see roughly 2/3 hit ~ 1/3 not hit over chosen horizons. The problem of unfair payouts or too many pockets still prevails though.

I think if you got really, really good at using LOTT, you would be in a better position than most every other system player. Better to the point that you really could minimise your losses to the house edge of -2.7%.

So to call it nonsense is not really a fair call.

 

Bombus,

I really like your view and honest post. I kind of agree with it for a live wheel. For the random game played on an RNG, not so much.