Roulette the romantique holygrail roulette system

only 3 players
1st spin A player bet
2nd spin B player bet
3rd spin Cplayer bet
4th spin A-B-C players bet

each player bet in parachute way . after a win we keep 1c as profit and we use the rest gained chips to reduce the debt of A player[=biggest debt]

lets see some bets lets say A=19c debt B=13 C=9 so next spin

write 20 bet 1c to straight [lose] so next spin
write 14 bet 1c to split [lose] so next
write 10 bet 1c to 3numbers [lose]so next
write 21-15-11 bet 1c to straight 1c to split 1c to 3numbers [3numbers win ]so we won 12c so we keep 1c as profit and we reduce the debt 21-11=10 so now the debts are A=15 B=11 C=10

you re going to fall in love with this system just test it and reach your dreams!

 

https://roulette-simulator.info/en/game/59c34ffada95d079143b0836a7ff5740
a small taste to be continued

 

https://roulette-simulator.info/en/game/2be6fab3536c17bc125998748268ebc0

 

https://roulette-simulator.info/en/game/efe7343a4b7073fd21277416de6ab59d

 

Ahem .. getting smarter.

 

Now, why don't you try:

• rather than players, put exposition in fore
• rather than cycling through coverage from minimum to higher coverage over several spins = one block;
instead alternate coverage instead over two blocks, where activating switching the 2nd block
is contingent on a hit realized
= maintaining the wider coverage (2-3 players) until the hit
= using the gains made with ↑reinvested into a block of several spins
~ switching from wider (2-3 players, perhaps cycling through both .. 2-3-2-3,
or use 2-2-2-2-..-3-3-3-3 style)
~ on hit switching to focused (1 player only, perhaps cycling through various reduced coverage type)
~ maintain the focused block (1 player) for as long as the 1st hit gains are depleted,
in other words .. once arriving at the ≈same exposition amount as before the 1st hit,
or slightly exceeding it
= hit on any spin in the focused block of spins, or no-hit & the ↑ ≈same exposition (1 player),
switch back to wider coverage (2-3 players)
• for wide use (DS, Q, ST)
• for focused use (ST, SP, SU)

.

ⁿ = numbers played/position (/player)
DS (6ⁿ) = double street, line
Q (4ⁿ) = quad, corner
ST (3ⁿ) = street
SP (2ⁿ) = split
SU (1ⁿ) = straight-up

 

Now, why don't you try:

a) rather than players, put exposition in fore

• so that players are structured according to the hit
• that the vertical progression, starting at the reduced coverage block first, & the only if necessary on the wider block as well -- according to the exposition (or how much games asks to close the game in positive)

b) rather than cycling through coverage from minimum to higher coverage over several spins = one block;
instead alternate coverage instead over two blocks, where activating switching the 2nd block
is contingent on a hit realized

• maintaining the wider coverage (2-3 players) until the hit
• using the gains made with ↑reinvested into a block of several spins
• switching from wider (2-3 players, perhaps cycling through both .. 2-3-2-3, or use 2-2-2-2-..-3-3-3-3 style)on hit
  • switching to focused (1 player only, perhaps cycling through various reduced coverage type)
  • maintain the focused block (1 player) for as long as the 1st hit gains are depleted, in other words .. once arriving at the ≈same exposition amount as before the 1st hit, or slightly exceeding it

• hit on any spin in the focused block of spins, or no-hit & the ↑ ≈same exposition (1 player), switch back to wider coverage (2-3 players)

c) payouts
.. or position/player depth

• for wide use (DS, Q, ST)
• • for focused use (ST, SP, SU)

.

ⁿ = numbers played/position (/player)
DS (6ⁿ) = double street, line
Q (4ⁿ) = quad, corner
ST (3ⁿ) = street
SP (2ⁿ) = split
SU (1ⁿ) = straight-up

 

This will give you a more efficient fundamental structure (dynamic), performance-wise.

 

Exposition
= how much (the game asks) to profit'

• play 2-3 players (vertically) flat for as long as possible
• rather 'push' (vertically) on 1-player
  • adjusted on each of its block of spins, according to the player type (payout) & exposition (=profit)
• restart on a new high (when a game is in plus, or positive)

 

See the improvement in drawdowns & game length overall;
= lower bankroll.

 

lets add more players.if the 1st cycle of 3players has no win we add player so the cycle of 4 players is AB---C---D---ABCD similar if we have no win we add player so the next cycle is AB---CD---E---ABCDE etc it is obvious that after any win we go to cycle of 3players [A---B---C---ABC]

 

The point is having the 'controlled descent' ... which is something newly noticeable in your graphs.
That's great.

But, what I am saying & somehow hasn't comprehended what I've written, so I'll say it differently.

 

When you use on the wider coverage only DS, Q, & ST .. adjusting those payouts to the exposition of course .. with 2-3 players you already cover plenty of numbers per spin -- at a lower/lowest cost

.

(.. unlike cycling &or combining all the payouts till or for the first hit (that would be including SU, SP, ST) ..

but with that, you would use more positions or players, to cover the ≈same amount of numbers per spin = thus units per spin .. which would make the descent more than necessary ≠ not minimized = less controlled).

 

I found out that's it better ..

to use those, now extra unspent, units .. on the focused coverage, or reduced number of players once you receive or realize a hit ..

So 'push' rather with a smaller, now reduced coverage, over more spins ..

• firstly, with a reduced number of players (1 player)
• secondly, with deeper payouts (adjusted to the exposition)
• thirdly, only if necessary! (rather use a deeper payout first) .. the vertical increase

.

With units reinvested from the wider coverage gains

• this works like positive progression hidden or placed within the negative
• that is, a press done with payouts (1-player only) without adding any extra units on top per spin (unlike EC press)
• although you might add a few extra to the whole block of those several spins, as there are worth more to close the game

Since you are using 1-player only (options SU, SP, ST) & deeper payouts (more return on hit) .. you can stretch the use of already gained units further, over (the block of) more spins .. thus the most cost-effectively facilitate the opportunity for the 'wheel to work in your favor' .. by producing more results to match your bet.

 

To recap;

so you see .. that you spend less till the first hit using higher payouts (DS,Q,ST) on fewer players (2-3), having the most controlled descent

.. & in case of no-hit the lowest possible & most recoverable drawdowns, requiring the shortest in-favor variance to profit.

.

Activating & using the focused block's deeper payouts (SU, SP, ST) on 1-player only after the 1st wider hit, you again spend less & get in exchange more spin outcomes to match your bet = focused hit, thus close in positive.

.

Mostly with 2-3 hits only being sufficient enough.

 

When the focused hit is received as well the game is closed = 1st wider hit + 2nd focused hit = combo (hit).

.

If no focused hit is received within the focused block of spins, the exposition gets/is at the ≈same point as before the 1st hit, & you switch back to wider coverage .. for the next first hit.

So, you see, first hit establishes the 'jumping board to jump on the other side of the room (with the next step), & thereof either

• focused hit realizes the combo .. closes the game
• a series of wide hits only, allows you to travel the variance as cheaply as possible = generating the lowest drawdown recoverable with fewest numbers played+least units = also the cheapest & most cost-effectively

 

So, if focused didn't hit

• it cost you nothing .. playing those spins with the casino's money
• since using 1-player only (payout adjusted to the exposition), the casino's money can be used over (many) more spins
• after those maximized number of spins, it brings you to the same position level (as before the 1st hit), effectively incurring no additional cost, or the need to increase vertically on the wide side ... which both combined (2-3 players → 1 player) is the most cost-effective dynamic you can have ..
• for another combo attempt = 'establish the board & jump' closing the game

 

My email is in the profile .. I am willing to show you a practical example, if you so wish.
But won't post that here for all the eyes to see,

 

Till first hit .. AB(C) players
On hit .. A player .. deeper payout(s)

 

Combo as a fundamental building block;
two hits close together/nearby = wide + focused.

See this tiles video:
variance as length & tiles as hits, close-by.

Single wide hits only, traversing variance spins cheaply,
pair of tiles = combo = closed game (in most cases, sometimes need two ..)