Roulette The Turbo Inside Martingale

Pick any three or four numbers and run the inside modified like Martingale and you'll basically be playing exactly like Turbo plays. It doesn't matter what numbers you choose or whether you change the numbers at each spin. All you have to do is keep raising your bets until you hit. A progression can't turn a losing system into a winning one so the system is just borrowing money from the future in order to pay for the present. Unfortunately players like Turbo can't look past the next few spins and recognize that the system is a catastrophic loser in the long term.


1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
8
8
8
8
8
8
etc. Just keep chasing your losses until you hit, and then stop. Next post your winning graph. As long as bets increase the actual progression used doesn't matter much.

 

I did this already with my simulation. 800,000 spins, 10,000 sessions, and it made $32,500 that comes to $3.25 average each for 80+ spins per session. It's a winnings monster.

 

Finally someone who is giving clear step by step instructions to how the HolyGrail works. I chose 4 numbers randomly each spin, could not make it lose. Do you have a tipeee or something? THANK YOU DOCTOR!. 1000 Likes.

 

*sigh

 

whats with the constant turbo bashing

its like liberal media versus trump, relentless....and so very pointless

did i mention.....pointless

 

Bago,

Careful the forumtards will soak it up and think it's another holy grail. Who cares if it's a Ponzi Scheme. Around here short term graphs are more important than basic probability, common sense, and logic.

 

Wow I won again.

Betting numbers 1,2,3,4 wins

The funny thing is, I think I would have won regardless of what I bet. Free mode games, you've got to love them. LOL!!!

On a serious note, free mode games are pretend games and nothing more.

 

Cool ! See you at #1 then.
Oh wait, you can't do that.... never mind.
But it's pretend ! Everyone wins - you'll be #1 instead of me in no time at all !!!
Oh well.... you can't do that.
I know ! You don't have time... (whew) Saved you again.

 

Hahahaha owned! Ironically Ben Stein got owned multiple times in real life

 

Bago at Parx made a bunch of accounts and tried to do it - he scored pretty high for a week
or two, was pretty impressed actually even if he used trickery to do it.
But nope, never at #1 - never stayed there, never made millions.
Sir No One won't do it at all, he doesn't have the time lol.
(translated to : "Can't do it - hell no... I'll just say it's rigged for everyone to win.... that's
what I'll do......")
They always talk their talk but never back it up. I've backed up what I say and shown the
results on lots of different formats - they can't do it on 1 of them.....
But are right there to post a reply that I don't know what I'm talking about. It's strange.

I think it would be hilarious if one of them appeared somehow at the table when I'm playing
and stood behind my chair.. Every time I won they would say "Lucky".. or "Not enough
spins"... or "Rigged"... or "You don't know what you're talking about".... or any of the
many many BS things they come up with to explain WHAT THEY CAN'T DO...
Hell, right to the cashier and maybe out to the car they can keep doing it...
But by then it would be annoying. Then maybe at the end "You should give all that back !"
lol. Hopeless they are.

 

That's not a bad idea - just change the wording.
Instead of "Pick" - use the right bet selection... the rest of the quote is ok.

So lets say you use 4 numbers in your example.
1 number of the 4 appears better than expected.
Since your wins on it would be 1, then 2, then 4, then 8 and a win....
the loss on the other numbers is easily covered by the profit on the winning number(s).
Amazing right ? A win makes up for the other's losses... Only need 1 number to do this....
There's hope for you yet. Now if you could figure out which numbers to do this on....
YOU'RE IN !!!!!!!!!!
So close - maybe by making jokes you'll accidentally discover how to always win lol.
That would be funny and refreshing at the same time.

 

My four random numbers would perform just as well as your "predicted number".

 

That's a negative

 

There is only a 25% chance of that happening... as shown in the other thread -
out of 20 tries, 5 times "random" numbers did better.
15 out of 20 I did better.
So yes Sir No One - I will win against you're random numbers 75% of the time. Not bad at all.
But please, don't believe me lol - It's only proof. What you believe is more important.

You were knocking on the door there, don't run the other way lol.