Roulette Turbo's Principles for Winning

Here they are, followed by my comments.

Yes!

Not sure why you need to predict a current bet, or whether that means anything, but yes, I agree. You can't win by manipulating stakes but have to increase the accuracy of your predictions.

This is really just a repeat of (1).

Correction : looking at past results = useless info INCLUDING past results in your own session (are not past results in your session also past results? - of course they are). Incoherent.

First sentence true, second is false.

The first two sentences are true, but the third contradicts them and also the 2nd sentence in principle (5).

This is supposed to help with picking the right numbers, but it doesn't because if outcomes are random then numbers can become hot or go cold "instantly" (see principle (6)). So it amounts to another contradiction.

True, but useless. It's a bit like saying "I've never lost playing roulette", which would be true if you've never played it.

 

Actually I have to add something to my comment about principle 8. It's really supposed to mean that you shouldn't bet on a number which hasn't shown, but why not? It contradicts the principle which says "Both hot and cold numbers can instantly change states. Meaning hot #'s can stay that way, go cold, or perform at average and vice versa." In other words, outcomes are random.

 

9. There's water at the bottom of the ocean.

10. A number can't hit once unless it hasn't hit before.

Sorry, I had to add some additional Turbo like statements that he hasn't made, but likely would at some point in the future.

 

it's simple
You do not bet on cold numbers
there must be rules
more often ... the cold numbers get to be sleepers,
compared to by the hot numbers

 

BetJack,

Does a number that's just hit have a greater chance of winning on the next spin or the next series of spins? If so, then can you please post the probability of that number winning verses the cold number?

 

The hot numbers are always over the cold numbers, so they're hot ...
and fly to the top
think of hot air ...
the cold numbers are always low down ...
and on the thermometer the cold temperatures are at the bottom of the
the hottest

 

But principle 6 says it isn't so!

Turbo, please come up with a consistent set of principles. I don't mind if each one is false, but they must be consistent as a set.
If you insist on having it both ways you've already lost the argument, and all you can do is post unverified charts and results.

 

Please tell me you're joking. It says something about the quality of debate on this forum that I have to even ask that question.

 

It's just as cool as you think about it ....
such elegance of the numbers

 

I have a consistent set and that's what I use to win every time.

There's no argument - the only arguments come from others who don't seem to understand what I've explained.
(or goes against their beliefs - or what Einstein didn't say - or what Wikipedia said - or what a calculation said)

Yep. I post results. I verified them myself. I'm accused of hand picking good ones. Victory
is stripped away though because anyone can say it's not accurate results, not enough spins,
wasn't in my bedroom casino, rigged, jesus another 20 of them. So unverified it is I guess.
Everyone saw my balance at Parx Online, Everyone can see my balance at Roulette Simulator,
my accountant knows exactly (to the penny) what I won last year.
I'll have to work out a way to make a "certified by: " spot on the charts when I post them -
because clearly I'm full of shit. *sighs

 

Again, the only locations where you can seem to win are locations where Bago can win... and he has won more. And according to Bago, Bombus, Steve and others, your pretend mode free play sites aren't realistic. They're far from it.

You've accused Bago of cheating, but how do we know that you didn't cheat? Why should we believe that you're method is more credible than Bago's method?