Roulette Undeniable proof for the "repeaters"

You are wrong and it is very easy to demonstrate. It is the way (dumb) you are using which is flawed (like all your systems/theories). Indeed you are recording a Win each time your chosen street appears. But the very big problem is you completely forget the number of spins it takes, even if it needs 20 spins and it finally appears, you record it as a Win, which for me provides more Losses since you are losing chips more than the average to have your street finally hitting.
So your real Win Loss Ratio is not 63%/37% but 20%/80% putting a chip as streets appear until you have 6 max streets, and of course ends with -2,7%.

I still can't understand how someone, even a newbie, would believe that such a simplistic approach would provide a 63% hit rate on an even chance like you wrote, but at the same time claiming that it needs some aggressive progression from 1 unit to 10 units! despite having a so called edge?.
It reminds me of your single numbers method, putting a chip as numbers appear, and applying an aggressive progression. You just changed the bet location but the same fallacy remains.

 

Spins: 1-4-19-34-31-13-20-15-15-22-23-33-32-36-16-24-18-26-17-6

Turbo's way of recording this session: W-W-W.

Real bankroll after flat betting 1 unit on the 2 streets from each dozen: -21 units. Fuck I am down 21 units whereas I had a 100% hit rate W-W-W !!!.

 

Yes. Thank you for the expert investigation! You helped me win last night reading your pieces.

 

There is NO system mentioned here - how can you be "down" units ?

Congrats ! Now you might figure it out, or you might not..

 

He must mention units - as you say this creates an edge - and the only way to show the edge is through units at the END of a game.

 

Bago,


Maybe 1 hour later with the same numbers and Bank you would have been a winner .


That`s why I am attempting to win 2 out of 3 sessions .


Fair enough .


Play at your own risk .

 

I don't know how you call what you explained, that is to say betting on the two streets that come first for a repeat in each dozen?. To see if it has some merit, I made a simulation and I found that your stats W/L are not reflecting the real results of "what you explained".

I am not a Genius who can figure out how to turn a negative expectancy game into a positive one.

 

When I am playing the EC I call them 50/ 50 without going into a 2 page preamble about the 0 or 0/00 .

 

I see that roulettes is stil makin cats go insane, hey hey.

 

No system no method no anything and yet it has an edge! Welcome to the wonderful world of turbos math.

 

So you're betting 2s to become 3s?
Well there is a "costly" way of a progression to keep up in case you're filled up with 2s.

Lets say that you start betting as soon as you have four 2x.
Progression wise you can bet them for 8 times and then up a unit if no result.
If another 2x comes along the way and you have 5 you should bet 7 times and then up a unit and so on for every 2 coming your way while waiting for something to become 3.
Always up a unit and check if your total stakes are less than 35.

If you're not at a new high by the time you get a hit continue on with the rest of them upping as necessary.

Here I gave you a rough around the edges negative progression.
Test before use.

 

Wrong.

Bankroll is +21

Registry is WWW // ? WW

1st sixline of 1st dozen still active for an up coming bet.

Bago, if you're gonna bag someone out for doing something wrong then try to do it right, otherwise you just look like a dumbarse.

 

The misfits only know "attack mode".
Amazing since we're all here to win, yet they will continue on 17 pages
on a thread complaining about a "system" when none was mentioned...
Just to derail and argue when there's nothing to argue about.
I'm convinced they are here only to stop people from winning -
some kind of conspiracy at work... It's the only answer.

 

Yes Turbo, we're paid by the casino to hide the beauty of your math&logic, that's sad...

 

A baloney festival of no value .

 

Turbo ,


Drop that " bunker" mentality syndrome of a conspiracy . There is no conspiracy only difference of opinion .



ND

 

Actually, Turbo doesn't want others to have an opinion independent of him, which is why he plays word-games and refuses to agree on terms for his "ideas" to be tested.

He's now entered full-blown politician mode by refusing to allow any debate to take place (easy....just don't ever agree to terms). Then he complains about people arguing when it's literally the only option he has left on the table regarding his "ideas".

Turbo took his shot with roulette, and failed. But if he refuses any type of measurement, then he can always say his ideas are sound.

Literally the only believers left are actively trolling these boards. After all these years, he has zero real support from any other members.

 

The bets are done on streets not sixlines. I feel embarrassed for you and turbo who liked your post.

 

You're right, call it a typo.

...1st street of 1st dozen still active for an up coming bet.

Still, the balance is +21, and the registry is WWW // ?WW

So you remain wrong. I fell sorry for you with your foot in your mouth, dumbarse.

 

It is 6 the last spin that makes the only W for the initial bets on streets 1 and 2 with the two first spins 1 and 4.